Re: [PATCH] husb: Make control transactions asynchronous

[Max Krasnyansky <maxk@kernel.org>]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Max Krasnyansky wrote:
>> USB is 99.8% async now :). 0.2% is the three control requests that
>> we need to execute synchronously. We could off-load that to a thread
>> or something but it's not worth the pain since those requests are
>> performed only during device initialization (ie when device is
>> connected to the VM).
>>
>> The change is a bit bigger than I wanted due to the fact that generic
>> handle_packet()/handle_control() interface was not designed for
>> async transactions. So I ended up adding custom handle_packet()
>> code to usb-linux. We can make that generic if/when some other
>> component needs it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@kernel.org>
>> ---
>>  usb-linux.c |  461
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>  1 files changed, 369 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/usb-linux.c b/usb-linux.c
>> index c31d56a..3ac4440 100644
>> --- a/usb-linux.c
>> +++ b/usb-linux.c
>> @@ -25,28 +25,21 @@
>>   * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER
>> DEALINGS IN
>>   * THE SOFTWARE.
>>   */
>> +
>>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>>  #include "qemu-timer.h"
>> -#include "hw/usb.h"
>>   
> 
> hw/usb.h defines USBDevice.  By moving this include into the #if
> defined(__linux__) block, it breaks the win32 build.  I was able to fix
> it by moving it down to the #else clause.
> 
>> +static int ctrl_error()
>>   
> 
> This needs to be static int ctrl_error(void).
> 
> This patch fuzzed really bad for me (for some odd reason).  Since I
> can't test this easily, I'd rather you update your patch with these
> changes, and resend after testing.

Thanx for testing. I'll resend it.

Max