From: Tomas M <tomas@slax.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: advantages of AXFS over squashfs?
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:37:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48CA386C.609@slax.org> (raw)
Hello.
I read somewhere that AXFS is going to be a part of Linux kernel 2.6.28
( http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6179099416.html?kc=rss )
What are the advantages of AXFS compared to squashfs?
Why not to include squashfs instead?
Thank you
Tomas M
slax.org
next reply other threads:[~2008-09-12 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-12 9:37 Tomas M [this message]
2008-09-12 12:10 ` advantages of AXFS over squashfs? Christoph Hellwig
2008-09-15 15:42 ` Jared Hulbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48CA386C.609@slax.org \
--to=tomas@slax.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.