From: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
Cc: xenomai-core <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 10:18:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48D754D8.30205@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48D752BA.3000403@domain.hid>
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> [1]http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.real-time.xenomai.devel/5412/focus=5405
>>>
>> always-put-xnthread-base-into-registry.patch:
>> I understand the need, but I will cowardly let Philippe decide whether
>> he likes the implementation details.
>>
>> handle-base-xn_sys_current-1.patch:
>> In some places (pse51_mutex_timedlock_inner for instances) you use
>> XN_NO_HANDLE, in others (pse51_mutex_timedlock for instances) you use
>> NULL, are the two equivalents ? If yes, should not we always use the
>> same consistently ? Otherwise looks ok.
>
> I fail to find the NULL spots - which pse51_mutex_timedlock do you mean?
A few excerpts:
@@ -101,9 +103,14 @@ pse51_mutex_trylock_internal(xnthread_t
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
#endif /* XENO_DEBUG(POSIX) */
- owner = xnarch_atomic_intptr_cmpxchg(mutex->owner, NULL, cur);
- if (unlikely(owner != NULL))
+ ownerh = xnarch_atomic_cmpxchg(mutex->owner, XN_NO_HANDLE,
+ xnthread_handle(cur));
+ if (unlikely(ownerh)) {
+ owner = xnregistry_fetch(clear_claimed(ownerh));
+ if (!owner)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
return owner;
+ }
shadow->lockcnt = count;
return NULL;
@@ -128,32 +136,41 @@ static inline int pse51_mutex_timedlock_
(...)
- old = xnarch_atomic_intptr_cmpxchg(mutex->owner,
- owner, set_claimed(owner, 1));
- if (likely(old == owner))
+ old = xnarch_atomic_cmpxchg(mutex->owner, ownerh,
+ set_claimed(ownerh, 1));
+ if (likely(old == ownerh))
break;
test_no_owner:
- if (old == NULL) {
+ if (!old) {
/* Owner called fast mutex_unlock
(on another cpu) */
xnlock_put_irqrestore(&nklock, s);
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_lock(pthread_mu
goto out;
}
- owner = xnarch_atomic_intptr_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), NULL, cur);
+ owner = xnarch_atomic_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), XN_NO_HANDLE, cur);
if (likely(!owner)) {
shadow->lockcnt = 1;
cb_read_unlock(&shadow->lock, s);
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_timedlock(pthre
int err = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
- xnthread_t *cur, *owner;
+ xnhandle_t cur, owner;
cur = xeno_get_current();
if (!cur)
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_timedlock(pthre
goto out;
}
- owner = xnarch_atomic_intptr_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), NULL, cur);
+ owner = xnarch_atomic_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), XN_NO_HANDLE, cur);
if (likely(!owner)) {
shadow->lockcnt = 1;
cb_read_unlock(&shadow->lock, s);
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread
int err = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
- xnthread_t *cur, *owner;
+ xnhandle_t cur, owner;
cur = xeno_get_current();
if (!cur)
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_trylock(pthread
goto out;
}
- owner = xnarch_atomic_intptr_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), NULL, cur);
+ owner = xnarch_atomic_cmpxchg(get_ownerp(shadow), XN_NO_HANDLE, cur);
if (likely(!owner)) {
shadow->lockcnt = 1;
cb_read_unlock(&shadow->lock, s);
@@ -325,8 +325,8 @@ int __wrap_pthread_mutex_unlock(pthread_
int err = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
- xnarch_atomic_intptr_t *ownerp;
- xnthread_t *cur;
+ xnarch_atomic_t *ownerp;
+ xnhandle_t cur, owner;
cur = xeno_get_current();
if (!cur)
--
Gilles.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-22 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-15 15:14 [Xenomai-core] [RFC][PATCH] Factor out xnsynch_acquire/release Jan Kiszka
2008-09-15 17:10 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-16 17:15 ` Philippe Gerum
2008-09-21 10:24 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-21 17:48 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-09-21 18:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-21 19:03 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-09-22 8:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-22 8:18 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix [this message]
2008-09-22 8:57 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-22 18:41 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-09-23 8:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-23 8:45 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-09-23 9:01 ` Jan Kiszka
2008-09-22 8:19 ` Philippe Gerum
2008-09-23 14:59 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48D754D8.30205@domain.hid \
--to=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.