All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
To: Ken'ichi Ohmichi <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: the exiting makedumpfile is almost there... :)
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:22:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DBE4DF.30801@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DB7692.1020002@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4460 bytes --]

Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
> Hi Jay,

Hi Ken'ichi San,

The latest patch worked on my 2p A350 IA64 as well as on my 128p 256G
memory A4700 machines! And it still took less than 2 minutes to
complete makedumpfile on the freshly booted A4700 (compared to >6
minutes doing 'cp --sparse=always' :) It would be fun to see how much
time to run makedumpfile on a 1TB system ;)

Congradulation, Ken'ichi! And, thanks a lot!

Now, only if i can cut out huge memory required for kdump kernel
due to cpus we do not need (hey, maxcpus=1!) and due to disk arrays
we do not use! ;)

Cheers,
 - jay

> 
> The last patch contained a bug yet, so please use this patch.
> Sorry for my mistake.
> 
> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>> Yes, your test data helps me.
>> Your test informed me that there was the buffer-handling problem
>> referring different page yet, so the last patch is not enough.
>> I created the attached patch for fixing it. Could you test the
>> attached patch again ?  Sorry for many tests.
>>
>> This patch is for makedumpfile-1.2.9.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>>
>> diff -puN a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>> --- a/makedumpfile.c	2008-09-25 15:39:00.000000000 +0900
>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c	2008-09-25 15:39:17.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>  	unsigned int mm;
>>  	unsigned long mem_map;
>>  	unsigned long long pfn, paddr, pfn_mm;
>> +	unsigned long long pfn_read_start, pfn_read_end, index_pg;
>>  	unsigned char *page_cache = NULL, *pcache;
>>  	unsigned int _count;
>>  	unsigned long flags, mapping;
>> @@ -4156,6 +4157,12 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>  		if (mem_map == NOT_MEMMAP_ADDR)
>>  			continue;
>>  
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Refresh the buffer of struct page, when changing mem_map.
>> +		 */
>> +		pfn_read_start = ULONGLONG_MAX;
>> +		pfn_read_end   = 0;
>> +
>>  		for (; pfn < mmd->pfn_end;
>>  		    pfn++, mem_map += SIZE(page),
>>  		    paddr += info->page_size) {
>> @@ -4166,16 +4173,23 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>  			if (!is_in_segs(paddr))
>>  				continue;
>>  
>> -			if ((pfn % PGMM_CACHED) == 0) {
>> -				if (pfn + PGMM_CACHED < mmd->pfn_end)
>> -					pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED;
>> +			index_pg = pfn % PGMM_CACHED;
>> +			if (pfn < pfn_read_start || pfn_read_end < pfn) {
>> +				if (roundup(pfn, PGMM_CACHED) < mmd->pfn_end)
>                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is a bug.
> The above should be roundup(pfn + 1, PGMM_CACHED).
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Ken'ichi Ohmichi
> 
> ---
> diff -puN a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
> --- a/makedumpfile.c	2008-09-04 16:31:58.000000000 +0900
> +++ b/makedumpfile.c	2008-09-25 20:27:48.000000000 +0900
> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>  	unsigned int mm;
>  	unsigned long mem_map;
>  	unsigned long long pfn, paddr, pfn_mm;
> +	unsigned long long pfn_read_start, pfn_read_end, index_pg;
>  	unsigned char *page_cache = NULL, *pcache;
>  	unsigned int _count;
>  	unsigned long flags, mapping;
> @@ -4156,6 +4157,12 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>  		if (mem_map == NOT_MEMMAP_ADDR)
>  			continue;
>  
> +		/*
> +		 * Refresh the buffer of struct page, when changing mem_map.
> +		 */
> +		pfn_read_start = ULONGLONG_MAX;
> +		pfn_read_end   = 0;
> +
>  		for (; pfn < mmd->pfn_end;
>  		    pfn++, mem_map += SIZE(page),
>  		    paddr += info->page_size) {
> @@ -4166,16 +4173,24 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>  			if (!is_in_segs(paddr))
>  				continue;
>  
> -			if ((pfn % PGMM_CACHED) == 0) {
> -				if (pfn + PGMM_CACHED < mmd->pfn_end)
> -					pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED;
> +			index_pg = pfn % PGMM_CACHED;
> +			if (pfn < pfn_read_start || pfn_read_end < pfn) {
> +				if (roundup(pfn + 1, PGMM_CACHED) < mmd->pfn_end)
> +					pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED - index_pg;
>  				else
>  					pfn_mm = mmd->pfn_end - pfn;
> -				if (!readmem(VADDR, mem_map, page_cache,
> -				    SIZE(page) * pfn_mm))
> +
> +				if (!readmem(VADDR, mem_map,
> +				    page_cache + (index_pg * SIZE(page)),
> +				    SIZE(page) * pfn_mm)) {
> +					ERRMSG("Can't read the buffer of struct page.\n");
>  					goto out;
> +				}
> +				pfn_read_start = pfn;
> +				pfn_read_end   = pfn + pfn_mm - 1;
>  			}
> -			pcache  = page_cache + ((pfn%PGMM_CACHED) * SIZE(page));
> +			pcache  = page_cache + (index_pg * SIZE(page));
> +
>  			flags   = ULONG(pcache + OFFSET(page.flags));
>  			_count  = UINT(pcache + OFFSET(page._count));
>  			mapping = ULONG(pcache + OFFSET(page.mapping));
> 



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-25 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-10 23:28 the exiting makedumpfile is almost there... :) Jay Lan
2008-09-11  2:03 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-11  8:21   ` Bernhard Walle
2008-09-11  2:31 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-11 14:13 ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-11 14:32 ` Hedi Berriche
2008-09-12  2:21   ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-12 13:38     ` Jay Lan
2008-09-12 19:49       ` Jay Lan
2008-09-12 20:38         ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-12 22:21           ` Jay Lan
2008-09-15 15:24             ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-22 11:14             ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-23 15:41               ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-24  1:09                 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-24 18:30                   ` Jay Lan
2008-09-24 21:56                     ` Jay Lan
2008-09-25  6:38                       ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-25 11:31                         ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-25 19:22                           ` Jay Lan [this message]
2008-09-26  0:17                             ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-23 20:20               ` Jay Lan
2008-09-23 20:47                 ` Dave Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48DBE4DF.30801@sgi.com \
    --to=jlan@sgi.com \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=hedi@sgi.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.