From: "Ken'ichi Ohmichi" <oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp>
To: Jay Lan <jlan@sgi.com>
Cc: kexec@lists.infradead.org, Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
Hedi Berriche <hedi@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: the exiting makedumpfile is almost there... :)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 09:17:03 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48DC29FF.6060501@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48DBE4DF.30801@sgi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4494 bytes --]
Hi Jay,
Thank you so much for many tests and reports.
Jay Lan wrote:
> The latest patch worked on my 2p A350 IA64 as well as on my 128p 256G
> memory A4700 machines! And it still took less than 2 minutes to
> complete makedumpfile on the freshly booted A4700 (compared to >6
> minutes doing 'cp --sparse=always' :) It would be fun to see how much
> time to run makedumpfile on a 1TB system ;)
Oh, It makes me happy :-)
The latest patch will be merged to the next release.
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>> The last patch contained a bug yet, so please use this patch.
>> Sorry for my mistake.
>>
>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote:
>>> Yes, your test data helps me.
>>> Your test informed me that there was the buffer-handling problem
>>> referring different page yet, so the last patch is not enough.
>>> I created the attached patch for fixing it. Could you test the
>>> attached patch again ? Sorry for many tests.
>>>
>>> This patch is for makedumpfile-1.2.9.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>>>
>>> diff -puN a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>>> --- a/makedumpfile.c 2008-09-25 15:39:00.000000000 +0900
>>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c 2008-09-25 15:39:17.000000000 +0900
>>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>> unsigned int mm;
>>> unsigned long mem_map;
>>> unsigned long long pfn, paddr, pfn_mm;
>>> + unsigned long long pfn_read_start, pfn_read_end, index_pg;
>>> unsigned char *page_cache = NULL, *pcache;
>>> unsigned int _count;
>>> unsigned long flags, mapping;
>>> @@ -4156,6 +4157,12 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>> if (mem_map == NOT_MEMMAP_ADDR)
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Refresh the buffer of struct page, when changing mem_map.
>>> + */
>>> + pfn_read_start = ULONGLONG_MAX;
>>> + pfn_read_end = 0;
>>> +
>>> for (; pfn < mmd->pfn_end;
>>> pfn++, mem_map += SIZE(page),
>>> paddr += info->page_size) {
>>> @@ -4166,16 +4173,23 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>>> if (!is_in_segs(paddr))
>>> continue;
>>>
>>> - if ((pfn % PGMM_CACHED) == 0) {
>>> - if (pfn + PGMM_CACHED < mmd->pfn_end)
>>> - pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED;
>>> + index_pg = pfn % PGMM_CACHED;
>>> + if (pfn < pfn_read_start || pfn_read_end < pfn) {
>>> + if (roundup(pfn, PGMM_CACHED) < mmd->pfn_end)
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This is a bug.
>> The above should be roundup(pfn + 1, PGMM_CACHED).
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Ken'ichi Ohmichi
>>
>> ---
>> diff -puN a/makedumpfile.c b/makedumpfile.c
>> --- a/makedumpfile.c 2008-09-04 16:31:58.000000000 +0900
>> +++ b/makedumpfile.c 2008-09-25 20:27:48.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -4133,6 +4133,7 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>> unsigned int mm;
>> unsigned long mem_map;
>> unsigned long long pfn, paddr, pfn_mm;
>> + unsigned long long pfn_read_start, pfn_read_end, index_pg;
>> unsigned char *page_cache = NULL, *pcache;
>> unsigned int _count;
>> unsigned long flags, mapping;
>> @@ -4156,6 +4157,12 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>> if (mem_map == NOT_MEMMAP_ADDR)
>> continue;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Refresh the buffer of struct page, when changing mem_map.
>> + */
>> + pfn_read_start = ULONGLONG_MAX;
>> + pfn_read_end = 0;
>> +
>> for (; pfn < mmd->pfn_end;
>> pfn++, mem_map += SIZE(page),
>> paddr += info->page_size) {
>> @@ -4166,16 +4173,24 @@ exclude_unnecessary_pages(void)
>> if (!is_in_segs(paddr))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if ((pfn % PGMM_CACHED) == 0) {
>> - if (pfn + PGMM_CACHED < mmd->pfn_end)
>> - pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED;
>> + index_pg = pfn % PGMM_CACHED;
>> + if (pfn < pfn_read_start || pfn_read_end < pfn) {
>> + if (roundup(pfn + 1, PGMM_CACHED) < mmd->pfn_end)
>> + pfn_mm = PGMM_CACHED - index_pg;
>> else
>> pfn_mm = mmd->pfn_end - pfn;
>> - if (!readmem(VADDR, mem_map, page_cache,
>> - SIZE(page) * pfn_mm))
>> +
>> + if (!readmem(VADDR, mem_map,
>> + page_cache + (index_pg * SIZE(page)),
>> + SIZE(page) * pfn_mm)) {
>> + ERRMSG("Can't read the buffer of struct page.\n");
>> goto out;
>> + }
>> + pfn_read_start = pfn;
>> + pfn_read_end = pfn + pfn_mm - 1;
>> }
>> - pcache = page_cache + ((pfn%PGMM_CACHED) * SIZE(page));
>> + pcache = page_cache + (index_pg * SIZE(page));
>> +
>> flags = ULONG(pcache + OFFSET(page.flags));
>> _count = UINT(pcache + OFFSET(page._count));
>> mapping = ULONG(pcache + OFFSET(page.mapping));
>>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-26 0:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 23:28 the exiting makedumpfile is almost there... :) Jay Lan
2008-09-11 2:03 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-11 8:21 ` Bernhard Walle
2008-09-11 2:31 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-11 14:13 ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-11 14:32 ` Hedi Berriche
2008-09-12 2:21 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-12 13:38 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-12 19:49 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-12 20:38 ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-12 22:21 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-15 15:24 ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-22 11:14 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-23 15:41 ` Dave Anderson
2008-09-24 1:09 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-24 18:30 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-24 21:56 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-25 6:38 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-25 11:31 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi
2008-09-25 19:22 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-26 0:17 ` Ken'ichi Ohmichi [this message]
2008-09-23 20:20 ` Jay Lan
2008-09-23 20:47 ` Dave Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48DC29FF.6060501@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--to=oomichi@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp \
--cc=anderson@redhat.com \
--cc=hedi@sgi.com \
--cc=jlan@sgi.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.