From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:18:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E22720.9030603@yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080930112241.GC21367@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> cat-7717 [000] 1392.941867: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
>> cat-7717 [000] 1393.005963: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
>> cat-7717 [000] 1393.033222: __switch_to <-schedule
>>
>> Here a schedule seemingly doesn't happen for a few hundredths of a second...
>
> that's about 60 msecs. ath5k_intr IRQ handling overhead? IRQ handlers
> are non-preemptible. (even under CONFIG_PREEMPT=y)
What about the piece leading up to that:
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.772263: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773224: __tasklet_schedule <-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773225: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773225: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773226: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773232: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773240: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773251: schedule_delayed_work
<-put_queue
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773251: queue_delayed_work
<-schedule_delayed_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773258: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773258: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773259: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773267: schedule_console_callback
<-kbd_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773268: schedule_work
<-schedule_console_callback
cat-7717 [000] 1392.773268: queue_work <-schedule_work
cat-7717 [000] 1392.807931: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839464: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
Here's a snippet from
http://sucs.org/~sits/test/eeepc-debug/20080929/trace-on-battery.txt.bz2 :
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752092: acpi_ec_check_status
<-acpi_ec_wait
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752093: constant_test_bit
<-acpi_ec_check_status
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752095: mutex_unlock
<-acpi_ec_transaction
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752096: acpi_ex_enter_interpreter
<-acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752097: acpi_os_wait_semaphore
<-acpi_ut_acquire_mutex
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752097: down_timeout
<-acpi_os_wait_semaphore
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752098: acpi_ex_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ex_read_data_from_field
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752099: acpi_ex_release_mutex_object
<-acpi_ex_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752100: acpi_ev_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ex_release_mutex_object
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752100: __acpi_release_global_lock
<-acpi_ev_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752101: acpi_os_signal_semaphore
<-acpi_ev_release_global_lock
cat-7717 [000] 1392.752102: up <-acpi_os_signal_semaphore
...
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839447:
acpi_ex_truncate_for32bit_table <-acpi_ds_exec_end_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839447: acpi_ps_next_parse_state
<-acpi_ps_parse_loop
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839448: acpi_ps_complete_op
<-acpi_ps_parse_loop
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839448: acpi_ps_complete_this_op
<-acpi_ps_complete_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839449: acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
<-acpi_ps_complete_this_op
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839449: acpi_ps_get_arg
<-acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839450: acpi_ps_get_opcode_info
<-acpi_ps_get_arg
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839450: acpi_ps_get_arg
<-acpi_ps_delete_parse_tree
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839451: acpi_ps_get_opcode_info
<-acpi_ps_get_arg
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839452: do_IRQ <-common_interrupt
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839453: irq_enter <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839453: irq_to_desc <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839454: handle_fasteoi_irq <-do_IRQ
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839455: handle_IRQ_event
<-handle_fasteoi_irq
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839455: usb_hcd_irq <-handle_IRQ_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839456: uhci_irq <-usb_hcd_irq
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839458: ath5k_intr <-handle_IRQ_event
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839459: ath5k_hw_is_intr_pending
<-ath5k_intr
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839461: ath5k_hw_get_isr <-ath5k_intr
cat-7717 [000] 1392.839464: __tasklet_schedule <-ath5k_intr
Why didn't another process cut in from 1392.752092 to 1392.839464? In
the schedule grep normally runs for cat are half as long e.g.:
<idle>-0 [000] 1392.747102: __switch_to <-schedule
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747103: del_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747107:
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible <-msleep
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747107: schedule_timeout
<-schedule_timeout_uninterruptible
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747108: init_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747108: __mod_timer <-schedule_timeout
cat-7717 [000] 1392.747111: __switch_to <-schedule
<idle>-0 [000] 1392.749067: account_scheduler_latency
<-enqueue_task_fair
Further why (after taking a break to process the ath5k interrupt) did it
not schedule another process other than cat until 1393.033226:
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033215: set_normalized_timespec
<-ktime_get_ts
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033216: ktime_add_safe
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033217: ktime_add_safe
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033217: enqueue_hrtimer
<-hrtimer_start_range_ns
cat-7717 [000] 1393.033222: __switch_to <-schedule
hald-addon-inpu-3237 [000] 1393.033226: fget_light <-do_sys_poll
--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-30 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.ERZTl/6uH+mhNoef5fPJKTRjJag@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.PtPFzP5kIJVCCov6YCewrh+o4z4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.C6WSm5Rh2Nb+Qho7b0qDOZ9RPV8@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ch6j4qXs/2sFpLkHz5fXrtjTR8c@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Jx/Ygtm46CVRawlA6OnfYNn6cN0@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-18 7:26 ` How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be? Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] ` <fa.iIHgL48F3T5VAqFw3mqaf9Pzrs4@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Td8xkKZKMSMghlJmEYefTRVF2kc@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-19 11:54 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 14:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-22 11:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-22 12:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-09-23 6:33 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 11:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-23 16:30 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 19:39 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-23 22:01 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-27 20:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-28 20:56 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-29 8:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-29 23:11 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-30 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-30 13:18 ` Sitsofe Wheeler [this message]
2008-10-04 10:50 ` Reading EeePC900 battery info causes stalls when using SLUB (was Re: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?) Sitsofe Wheeler
[not found] <fa.vMKgvqjqmYnI2J40GHoTENeYm8U@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.808p0ZtU9DCpeky4KfNS8Drdw9w@ifi.uio.no>
2008-09-17 21:48 ` How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be? Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-17 22:29 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-18 2:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-09-18 18:25 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-19 8:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-17 21:18 Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:28 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-09-17 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-09-21 20:56 ` Matt Keenan
2008-09-22 6:50 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E22720.9030603@yahoo.com \
--to=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.