All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] approach to pull writepage out of reclaim
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:45:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EE6D4C.7080901@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081009194434.GB25780@parisc-linux.org>

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:06:15PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>> So. Firstly, what I'm looking at is doing swap writeout from pdflush. This
>>> patch does that (working in concept, but pdflush and background writeout
>>> from dirty inode list isn't really up to the task, might scrap it and do the
>>> writeout from kswap). But writeout from radix-tree should actually be able to
>>> give better swapout pattern than LRU writepage as well.
>> Patch is missing from the message.
> 
> It's no longer acceptable to post descriptions of what you're about to
> do?  You have to invest lots of time into creating a patch and testing that
> it works before posting it (only to have it shot down because someone
> disagrees with the design of your solution)?  Really?

The text says that a patch was included.... So I was expecting it....

But the problem you mention is real. Tried numerous times to get a conceptual
discussion going without a patch. Usually that does not lead to anything.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] approach to pull writepage out of reclaim
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:45:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EE6D4C.7080901@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081009194434.GB25780@parisc-linux.org>

Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 12:06:15PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>
>>> So. Firstly, what I'm looking at is doing swap writeout from pdflush. This
>>> patch does that (working in concept, but pdflush and background writeout
>>> from dirty inode list isn't really up to the task, might scrap it and do the
>>> writeout from kswap). But writeout from radix-tree should actually be able to
>>> give better swapout pattern than LRU writepage as well.
>> Patch is missing from the message.
> 
> It's no longer acceptable to post descriptions of what you're about to
> do?  You have to invest lots of time into creating a patch and testing that
> it works before posting it (only to have it shot down because someone
> disagrees with the design of your solution)?  Really?

The text says that a patch was included.... So I was expecting it....

But the problem you mention is real. Tried numerous times to get a conceptual
discussion going without a patch. Usually that does not lead to anything.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-09 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-09 14:41 [rfc] approach to pull writepage out of reclaim Nick Piggin
2008-10-09 14:41 ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-09 17:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-09 17:06   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-09 19:44   ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-09 19:44     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-10-09 20:45     ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2008-10-09 20:45       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-10  2:44       ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-10  2:44         ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-10  7:21 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-10  7:21   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-10-11  4:13   ` Nick Piggin
2008-10-11  4:13     ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48EE6D4C.7080901@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.