From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14]: Killing qdisc->ops->requeue().
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:41:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F4CBBA.7070004@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081014095246.GA10804@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> The aim of this patch-set is to finish changes proposed by David S.
> Miller in his patch-set with the same subject from Mon, 18 Aug 2008.
> The first two patches were applied with some modifications, so, to
> apply the rest, there were needed some changes.
>
> Original David's patches include additional info, but signed-off-by
> is removed because of changed context. I expect they will be merged
> and signed off by David as an author, anyway.
>
> The qdisc->requeue list idea is to limit requeuing to one level only,
> so a parent can requeue to its child only. This list is then tried
> first while dequeuing (qdisc_dequeue()), except at the top level,
> so packets could be requeued only by qdiscs, not by qdisc_restart()
> after xmit errors.
I still do not agree with this change. It essentially breaks multiq as
we are right back to all queues being stopped because of one packet in
the qdisc->requeue list.
I think if anything it seems like you guys actually found the cpu
performance issue a while back in the fact that the dev_requeue_skb was
calling __netif_schedule when requeuing on a stopped queue. That is the
one piece I would say needs to be changed so that you only call
__netif_schedule if the skb is not going to a stopped queue.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-14 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 9:52 [PATCH 00/14]: Killing qdisc->ops->requeue() Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 11:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 12:26 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 12:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 17:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 20:18 ` David Miller
2008-10-14 20:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-15 8:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-15 9:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 16:41 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2008-10-14 18:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 18:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 19:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 20:37 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-10-15 6:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-15 7:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F4CBBA.7070004@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.