[PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[Mark Jackson]

v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
Now uses spi_write_then_read()
Comments changed to include extra chips in the family

This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.

Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>
---
 drivers/rtc/Kconfig      |   11 +++
 drivers/rtc/Makefile     |    1 +
 drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c |  220 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
index 9a9755c..2d87c81 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
@@ -292,6 +292,17 @@ config RTC_DRV_DS1305
 	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
 	  will be called rtc-ds1305.
 
+config RTC_DRV_DS1390
+	tristate "Dallas/Maxim DS1390/93/94"
+	help
+	  If you say yes here you get support for the DS1390/93/94 chips.
+	  
+	  This driver only supports the RTC feature, and not other chip
+	  features such as alarms and trickle charging.
+
+	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
+	  will be called rtc-ds1390.
+
 config RTC_DRV_MAX6902
 	tristate "Maxim MAX6902"
 	help
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Makefile b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
index 18622ef..6306900 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/rtc/Makefile
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1302)	+= rtc-ds1302.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1305)	+= rtc-ds1305.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307)	+= rtc-ds1307.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1374)	+= rtc-ds1374.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1390)	+= rtc-ds1390.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1511)	+= rtc-ds1511.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1553)	+= rtc-ds1553.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1672)	+= rtc-ds1672.o
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..599e976
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1390.c
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * rtc-ds1390.c -- driver for DS1390/93/94
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Mercury IMC Ltd
+ * Written by Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * NOTE : Currently this driver only supports the bare minimum for read
+ * and write the RTC.  The extra features provided by the chip family
+ * (alarms, trickle charger, different control registers) are unavailable.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/rtc.h>
+#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
+#include <linux/bcd.h>
+
+#define DS1390_REG_100THS		0x00
+#define DS1390_REG_SECONDS		0x01
+#define DS1390_REG_MINUTES		0x02
+#define DS1390_REG_HOURS		0x03
+#define DS1390_REG_DAY			0x04
+#define DS1390_REG_DATE			0x05
+#define DS1390_REG_MONTH_CENT		0x06
+#define DS1390_REG_YEAR			0x07
+
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_100THS		0x08
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_SECONDS	0x09
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_MINUTES	0x0A
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_HOURS		0x0B
+#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_DAY_DATE	0x0C
+
+#define DS1390_REG_CONTROL		0x0D
+#define DS1390_REG_STATUS		0x0E
+#define DS1390_REG_TRICKLE		0x0F
+
+struct ds1390 {
+	struct rtc_device *rtc;
+	u8 txrx_buf[9];	/* cmd + 8 registers */
+};
+
+static void ds1390_set_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
+				unsigned char data)
+{
+	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	/* Set MSB to indicate write */
+	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address | 0x80;
+	chip->txrx_buf[1] = data;
+
+	/* do the i/o */
+	spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 2, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_get_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
+				unsigned char *data)
+{
+	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int status;
+
+	if (!data)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Clear MSB to indicate read */
+	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address & 0x7f;
+	/* do the i/o */
+	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 1);
+	if (status != 0)
+		return status;
+
+	*data = chip->txrx_buf[1];
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int ds1390_get_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
+{
+	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int status;
+
+	/* build the message */
+	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS;
+
+	/* do the i/o */
+	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 8);
+	if (status != 0)
+		return status;
+
+	/* The chip sends data in this order:
+	 * Seconds, Minutes, Hours, Day, Date, Month / Century, Year */
+	dt->tm_sec	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[0]);
+	dt->tm_min	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[1]);
+	dt->tm_hour	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[2]);
+	dt->tm_wday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[3]);
+	dt->tm_mday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[4]);
+	/* mask off century bit */
+	dt->tm_mon	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x7f) - 1;
+	/* adjust for century bit */
+	dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[6]) + ((chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x80) ? 100 : 0);
+
+	return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_set_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
+{
+	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
+	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	/* build the message */
+	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS | 0x80;
+	chip->txrx_buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
+	chip->txrx_buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
+	chip->txrx_buf[3] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour);
+	chip->txrx_buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday);
+	chip->txrx_buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
+	chip->txrx_buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1) |
+				((dt->tm_year > 99) ? 0x80 : 0x00);
+	chip->txrx_buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year % 100);
+
+	/* do the i/o */
+	return spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 8, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+	return ds1390_get_datetime(dev, tm);
+}
+
+static int ds1390_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
+{
+	return ds1390_set_datetime(dev, tm);
+}
+
+static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1390_rtc_ops = {
+	.read_time	= ds1390_read_time,
+	.set_time	= ds1390_set_time,
+};
+
+static int __devinit ds1390_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+	struct rtc_device *rtc;
+	unsigned char tmp;
+	struct ds1390 *chip;
+	int res;
+
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "DS1390 SPI RTC driver\n");
+
+	rtc = rtc_device_register("ds1390",
+				&spi->dev, &ds1390_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
+	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
+		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to register device\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(rtc);
+	}
+
+	spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
+	spi->bits_per_word = 8;
+	spi_setup(spi);
+
+	chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!chip) {
+		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to allocate device memory\n");
+		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	chip->rtc = rtc;
+	dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, chip);
+
+	res = ds1390_get_reg(&spi->dev, DS1390_REG_SECONDS, &tmp);
+	if (res) {
+		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to read device\n");
+		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+		return res;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __devexit ds1390_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
+{
+	struct ds1390 *chip = platform_get_drvdata(spi);
+	struct rtc_device *rtc = chip->rtc;
+
+	if (rtc)
+		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
+
+	kfree(chip);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct spi_driver ds1390_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name	= "rtc-ds1390",
+		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
+	},
+	.probe	= ds1390_probe,
+	.remove = __devexit_p(ds1390_remove),
+};
+
+static __init int ds1390_init(void)
+{
+	return spi_register_driver(&ds1390_driver);
+}
+module_init(ds1390_init);
+
+static __exit void ds1390_exit(void)
+{
+	spi_unregister_driver(&ds1390_driver);
+}
+module_exit(ds1390_exit);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC driver");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[Alessandro Zummo]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
> 
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>

 Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo-BfzFCNDTiLLj+vYz1yj4TQ@public.gmane.org>
-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[Alessandro Zummo]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk> wrote:

> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
> 
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>

 Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
-- 

 Best regards,

 Alessandro Zummo,
  Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy

  http://www.towertech.it

Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
> 
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
> 

A neat-looking driver.  Some nitlets:

> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_100THS		0x08
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_SECONDS	0x09
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_MINUTES	0x0A
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_HOURS		0x0B
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_DAY_DATE	0x0C
> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_CONTROL		0x0D
> +#define DS1390_REG_STATUS		0x0E
> +#define DS1390_REG_TRICKLE		0x0F
> +
> +struct ds1390 {
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +	u8 txrx_buf[9];	/* cmd + 8 registers */
> +};
> +
> +static void ds1390_set_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> +				unsigned char data)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* Set MSB to indicate write */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address | 0x80;
> +	chip->txrx_buf[1] = data;
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 2, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> +				unsigned char *data)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int status;
> +
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -EINVAL;

This function only has one caller and that caller doesn't pass NULL, so
this test is unneeded.

> +	/* Clear MSB to indicate read */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address & 0x7f;
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 1);
> +	if (status != 0)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	*data = chip->txrx_buf[1];
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int status;
> +
> +	/* build the message */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS;
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 8);
> +	if (status != 0)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	/* The chip sends data in this order:
> +	 * Seconds, Minutes, Hours, Day, Date, Month / Century, Year */
> +	dt->tm_sec	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[0]);
> +	dt->tm_min	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[1]);
> +	dt->tm_hour	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[2]);
> +	dt->tm_wday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[3]);
> +	dt->tm_mday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[4]);
> +	/* mask off century bit */
> +	dt->tm_mon	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x7f) - 1;
> +	/* adjust for century bit */
> +	dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[6]) + ((chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x80) ? 100 : 0);
> +
> +	return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* build the message */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS | 0x80;
> +	chip->txrx_buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[3] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1) |
> +				((dt->tm_year > 99) ? 0x80 : 0x00);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year % 100);
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	return spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 8, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> +	return ds1390_get_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> +	return ds1390_set_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1390_rtc_ops = {
> +	.read_time	= ds1390_read_time,
> +	.set_time	= ds1390_set_time,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit ds1390_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +	unsigned char tmp;
> +	struct ds1390 *chip;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "DS1390 SPI RTC driver\n");

Should be KERN_INFO I guess.

> +	rtc = rtc_device_register("ds1390",
> +				&spi->dev, &ds1390_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to register device\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> +	}
> +
> +	spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> +	spi->bits_per_word = 8;
> +	spi_setup(spi);
> +
> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to allocate device memory\n");
> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	chip->rtc = rtc;
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, chip);
> +
> +	res = ds1390_get_reg(&spi->dev, DS1390_REG_SECONDS, &tmp);
> +	if (res) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to read device\n");

- Perhaps the "RTC" should identify which driver is doing the
  shouting.  We have a huge number of "rtc" drivers, so this message
  will be rather ambiguous.

- Colons are not preceded by spaces in written English.

> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +		return res;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit ds1390_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = platform_get_drvdata(spi);
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc = chip->rtc;
> +
> +	if (rtc)
> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +
> +	kfree(chip);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct spi_driver ds1390_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "rtc-ds1390",
> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +	.probe	= ds1390_probe,
> +	.remove = __devexit_p(ds1390_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static __init int ds1390_init(void)
> +{
> +	return spi_register_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_init(ds1390_init);
> +
> +static __exit void ds1390_exit(void)
> +{
> +	spi_unregister_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(ds1390_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Jackson <mpfj-kZtEnBLzDKq1Qrn1Bg8BZw@public.gmane.org>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/

Re: [PATCH v4] Add Dallas DS1390/93/94 RTC chips

[Andrew Morton]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:41:45 +0100
Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk> wrote:

> v4 of this patch with some code tidying as per previous comments.
> Also only a single tx/rx buffer is used.
> Now uses spi_write_then_read()
> Comments changed to include extra chips in the family
> 
> This patch adds support for the Dallas DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC chip.
> 

A neat-looking driver.  Some nitlets:

> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_100THS		0x08
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_SECONDS	0x09
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_MINUTES	0x0A
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_HOURS		0x0B
> +#define DS1390_REG_ALARM_DAY_DATE	0x0C
> +
> +#define DS1390_REG_CONTROL		0x0D
> +#define DS1390_REG_STATUS		0x0E
> +#define DS1390_REG_TRICKLE		0x0F
> +
> +struct ds1390 {
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +	u8 txrx_buf[9];	/* cmd + 8 registers */
> +};
> +
> +static void ds1390_set_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> +				unsigned char data)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* Set MSB to indicate write */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address | 0x80;
> +	chip->txrx_buf[1] = data;
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 2, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned char address,
> +				unsigned char *data)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int status;
> +
> +	if (!data)
> +		return -EINVAL;

This function only has one caller and that caller doesn't pass NULL, so
this test is unneeded.

> +	/* Clear MSB to indicate read */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = address & 0x7f;
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 1);
> +	if (status != 0)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	*data = chip->txrx_buf[1];
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_get_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int status;
> +
> +	/* build the message */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS;
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	status = spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 1, chip->txrx_buf, 8);
> +	if (status != 0)
> +		return status;
> +
> +	/* The chip sends data in this order:
> +	 * Seconds, Minutes, Hours, Day, Date, Month / Century, Year */
> +	dt->tm_sec	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[0]);
> +	dt->tm_min	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[1]);
> +	dt->tm_hour	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[2]);
> +	dt->tm_wday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[3]);
> +	dt->tm_mday	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[4]);
> +	/* mask off century bit */
> +	dt->tm_mon	= bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x7f) - 1;
> +	/* adjust for century bit */
> +	dt->tm_year = bcd2bin(chip->txrx_buf[6]) + ((chip->txrx_buf[5] & 0x80) ? 100 : 0);
> +
> +	return rtc_valid_tm(dt);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_datetime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *dt)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	/* build the message */
> +	chip->txrx_buf[0] = DS1390_REG_SECONDS | 0x80;
> +	chip->txrx_buf[1] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_sec);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[2] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_min);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[3] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_hour);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[4] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_wday);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[5] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mday);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[6] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_mon + 1) |
> +				((dt->tm_year > 99) ? 0x80 : 0x00);
> +	chip->txrx_buf[7] = bin2bcd(dt->tm_year % 100);
> +
> +	/* do the i/o */
> +	return spi_write_then_read(spi, chip->txrx_buf, 8, NULL, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> +	return ds1390_get_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static int ds1390_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> +	return ds1390_set_datetime(dev, tm);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct rtc_class_ops ds1390_rtc_ops = {
> +	.read_time	= ds1390_read_time,
> +	.set_time	= ds1390_set_time,
> +};
> +
> +static int __devinit ds1390_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc;
> +	unsigned char tmp;
> +	struct ds1390 *chip;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	printk(KERN_DEBUG "DS1390 SPI RTC driver\n");

Should be KERN_INFO I guess.

> +	rtc = rtc_device_register("ds1390",
> +				&spi->dev, &ds1390_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> +	if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to register device\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> +	}
> +
> +	spi->mode = SPI_MODE_3;
> +	spi->bits_per_word = 8;
> +	spi_setup(spi);
> +
> +	chip = kzalloc(sizeof *chip, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!chip) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to allocate device memory\n");
> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	chip->rtc = rtc;
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&spi->dev, chip);
> +
> +	res = ds1390_get_reg(&spi->dev, DS1390_REG_SECONDS, &tmp);
> +	if (res) {
> +		printk(KERN_ALERT "RTC : unable to read device\n");

- Perhaps the "RTC" should identify which driver is doing the
  shouting.  We have a huge number of "rtc" drivers, so this message
  will be rather ambiguous.

- Colons are not preceded by spaces in written English.

> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +		return res;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __devexit ds1390_remove(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct ds1390 *chip = platform_get_drvdata(spi);
> +	struct rtc_device *rtc = chip->rtc;
> +
> +	if (rtc)
> +		rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> +
> +	kfree(chip);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct spi_driver ds1390_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "rtc-ds1390",
> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +	.probe	= ds1390_probe,
> +	.remove = __devexit_p(ds1390_remove),
> +};
> +
> +static __init int ds1390_init(void)
> +{
> +	return spi_register_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_init(ds1390_init);
> +
> +static __exit void ds1390_exit(void)
> +{
> +	spi_unregister_driver(&ds1390_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(ds1390_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("DS1390/93/94 SPI RTC driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Mark Jackson <mpfj@mimc.co.uk>");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");