* build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-17 19:32 Chris Friesen 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely 2008-10-21 5:33 ` Paul Mackerras 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-17 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel The current -git fails to build on 64-bit powerpc (failure log below) . Initially I tried using my older toolchain, when I first saw the problem I built a new toolchain with crosstool (gcc 4.1.2 and binutils 2.16.1) and tried again but got the same problem. 2.6.27 doesn't show this problem. Any ideas what's going on and how I can fix it? Thanks, Chris LD vmlinux.o MODPOST vmlinux.o WARNING: modpost: Found 4 section mismatch(es). To see full details build your kernel with: 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' GEN .version CHK include/linux/compile.h UPD include/linux/compile.h CC init/version.o LD init/built-in.o LD .tmp_vmlinux1 /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: BFD 2.16.1 internal error, aborting at /home/cfriesen/crosstool-0.43/build/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/binutils-2.16.1/bfd/elflink.c line 6419 in elf_link_output_extsym /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: Please report this bug. make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-17 19:32 build failure on powerpc with current -git Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely 2008-10-21 5:33 ` Paul Mackerras 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-10-18 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Friesen; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > The current -git fails to build on 64-bit powerpc (failure log below) . > Initially I tried using my older toolchain, when I first saw the problem > I built a new toolchain with crosstool (gcc 4.1.2 and binutils 2.16.1) > and tried again but got the same problem. > > 2.6.27 doesn't show this problem. > > Any ideas what's going on and how I can fix it? This is a know bug with binutils 2.16.1. You can work around it by either reverting commit 549e8152de8039506f69c677a4546e5427aa6ae7 or upgrading to a newer version of binutils. Nobody has a fix for this problem yet. (it's definitely a binutils bug, but the kernel exposed it where it wasn't an issue before. I don't know if support for 2.16.1 is going to be depreciated due to this. It seems like there are still a fair few users of binutils 2.16.1) g. > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > LD vmlinux.o > MODPOST vmlinux.o > WARNING: modpost: Found 4 section mismatch(es). > To see full details build your kernel with: > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' > GEN .version > CHK include/linux/compile.h > UPD include/linux/compile.h > CC init/version.o > LD init/built-in.o > LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: > BFD 2.16.1 internal error, aborting at > /home/cfriesen/crosstool-0.43/build/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/binutils-2.16.1/bfd/elflink.c > line 6419 in elf_link_output_extsym > > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: > Please report this bug. > > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2008-10-18 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Friesen; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel, paulus, benh On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > The current -git fails to build on 64-bit powerpc (failure log below) . > Initially I tried using my older toolchain, when I first saw the problem > I built a new toolchain with crosstool (gcc 4.1.2 and binutils 2.16.1) > and tried again but got the same problem. > > 2.6.27 doesn't show this problem. > > Any ideas what's going on and how I can fix it? This is a know bug with binutils 2.16.1. You can work around it by either reverting commit 549e8152de8039506f69c677a4546e5427aa6ae7 or upgrading to a newer version of binutils. Nobody has a fix for this problem yet. (it's definitely a binutils bug, but the kernel exposed it where it wasn't an issue before. I don't know if support for 2.16.1 is going to be depreciated due to this. It seems like there are still a fair few users of binutils 2.16.1) g. > > Thanks, > > Chris > > > LD vmlinux.o > MODPOST vmlinux.o > WARNING: modpost: Found 4 section mismatch(es). > To see full details build your kernel with: > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' > GEN .version > CHK include/linux/compile.h > UPD include/linux/compile.h > CC init/version.o > LD init/built-in.o > LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: > BFD 2.16.1 internal error, aborting at > /home/cfriesen/crosstool-0.43/build/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/binutils-2.16.1/bfd/elflink.c > line 6419 in elf_link_output_extsym > > /opt/crosstool/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.3.6/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-ld: > Please report this bug. > > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-17 19:32 build failure on powerpc with current -git Chris Friesen 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely @ 2008-10-21 5:33 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Paul Mackerras @ 2008-10-21 5:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Friesen; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel Chris Friesen writes: > The current -git fails to build on 64-bit powerpc (failure log below) . > Initially I tried using my older toolchain, when I first saw the > problem I built a new toolchain with crosstool (gcc 4.1.2 and binutils > 2.16.1) and tried again but got the same problem. It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it working for you. Paul. diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper b/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper index 25fe9d6..e8acee2 100755 --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper @@ -284,6 +284,8 @@ if [ -n "$dtb" ]; then if [ -n "$dts" ]; then rm $dtb fi +else + addsec $tmp /dev/null .kernel:dtb fi if [ "$platform" != "miboot" ]; then diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S index b39c27e..384dca5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ SECTIONS *(.machine.desc) __machine_desc_end = . ; } +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE . = ALIGN(8); .dynsym : AT(ADDR(.dynsym) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynsym) } .dynstr : AT(ADDR(.dynstr) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynstr) } @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ SECTIONS __rela_dyn_start = .; *(.rela*) } +#endif /* Fake ELF header containing RPA note; for addnote */ .fakeelf : AT(ADDR(.fakeelf) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.fakeelf) } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-21 5:33 ` Paul Mackerras @ 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Linux, kernel, linuxppc-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 890 bytes --] Hi Paulus, On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > working for you. With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig build (linux-next). /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries] Error 1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-21 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Chris Friesen, linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 890 bytes --] Hi Paulus, On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > working for you. With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig build (linux-next). /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pmac] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file make[2]: *** [arch/powerpc/boot/zImage.pseries] Error 1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Paul Mackerras @ 2008-10-22 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev Stephen Rothwell writes: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > > working for you. > > With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig > build (linux-next). > > /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file Hmmm, so do I, and in fact the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change now seems to be unnecessary with my cross-compile setup (which has ld 2.16.1), whereas yesterday I'm sure it got errors. Weird. Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it fixes things with the ld you use? Paul. --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S index b39c27e..384dca5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ SECTIONS *(.machine.desc) __machine_desc_end = . ; } +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE . = ALIGN(8); .dynsym : AT(ADDR(.dynsym) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynsym) } .dynstr : AT(ADDR(.dynstr) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynstr) } @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ SECTIONS __rela_dyn_start = .; *(.rela*) } +#endif /* Fake ELF header containing RPA note; for addnote */ .fakeelf : AT(ADDR(.fakeelf) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.fakeelf) } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Paul Mackerras @ 2008-10-22 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: Chris Friesen, linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel Stephen Rothwell writes: > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > > working for you. > > With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig > build (linux-next). > > /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file Hmmm, so do I, and in fact the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change now seems to be unnecessary with my cross-compile setup (which has ld 2.16.1), whereas yesterday I'm sure it got errors. Weird. Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it fixes things with the ld you use? Paul. --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S index b39c27e..384dca5 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S @@ -187,6 +187,7 @@ SECTIONS *(.machine.desc) __machine_desc_end = . ; } +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE . = ALIGN(8); .dynsym : AT(ADDR(.dynsym) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynsym) } .dynstr : AT(ADDR(.dynstr) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.dynstr) } @@ -202,6 +203,7 @@ SECTIONS __rela_dyn_start = .; *(.rela*) } +#endif /* Fake ELF header containing RPA note; for addnote */ .fakeelf : AT(ADDR(.fakeelf) - LOAD_OFFSET) { *(.fakeelf) } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras (?) @ 2008-10-22 15:19 ` Hollis Blanchard 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen -1 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Hollis Blanchard @ 2008-10-22 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1203 bytes --] On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> > wrote: > > > > > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > > > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > > > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > > > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > > > working for you. > > > > With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig > > build (linux-next). > > > > /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file > > Hmmm, so do I, and in fact the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change now > seems to be unnecessary with my cross-compile setup (which has ld > 2.16.1), whereas yesterday I'm sure it got errors. Weird. > > Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch > without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it > fixes things with the ld you use? > Works for me. binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) -Hollis [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1704 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-22 15:19 ` Hollis Blanchard @ 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-22 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hollis Blanchard Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Paul Mackerras, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev Hollis Blanchard wrote: > binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with > crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) I was wondering about that....wasted a bunch of time trying to build something more recent. Chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-22 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hollis Blanchard Cc: Paul Mackerras, Stephen Rothwell, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev Hollis Blanchard wrote: > binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with > crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) I was wondering about that....wasted a bunch of time trying to build something more recent. Chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-23 0:19 ` Josh Boyer -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Josh Boyer @ 2008-10-23 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Friesen Cc: linuxppc-dev, Stephen Rothwell, Paul Mackerras, Linux kernel, Hollis Blanchard On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:50:25AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hollis Blanchard wrote: > >> binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with >> crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) > > I was wondering about that....wasted a bunch of time trying to build > something more recent. I built binutils 2.18 for ppc, ppc no-float, ppc64, mips, and i386 yesterday. It worked fine... josh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-23 0:19 ` Josh Boyer 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Josh Boyer @ 2008-10-23 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Friesen Cc: Hollis Blanchard, Paul Mackerras, Stephen Rothwell, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:50:25AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > Hollis Blanchard wrote: > >> binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with >> crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) > > I was wondering about that....wasted a bunch of time trying to build > something more recent. I built binutils 2.18 for ppc, ppc no-float, ppc64, mips, and i386 yesterday. It worked fine... josh ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras (?) (?) @ 2008-10-22 15:21 ` Hollis Blanchard -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Hollis Blanchard @ 2008-10-22 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev (Oops, resending in plain text...) On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell writes: > > > On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:33:10 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > It's a bug in older versions of ld (including 2.16.1) that's fixed in > > > the current version (2.18). However, this patch appears to work > > > around the problem - at least, it let me build a 32-bit kernel with a > > > cross-toolchain including a 2.16.1 ld. Let me know if this gets it > > > working for you. > > > > With that patch applied I got these errors for a powerpc ppc64_defconfig > > build (linux-next). > > > > /usr/bin/objcopy: Warning: '/dev/null' is not an ordinary file > > Hmmm, so do I, and in fact the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change now > seems to be unnecessary with my cross-compile setup (which has ld > 2.16.1), whereas yesterday I'm sure it got errors. Weird. > > Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch > without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it > fixes things with the ld you use? Works for me. binutils 2.16.1 is the most recent binutils that will build with crosstool, so IMHO it's worth supporting. :) -Hollis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras @ 2008-10-22 17:49 ` Chris Friesen -1 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-22 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux kernel, linuxppc-dev Paul Mackerras wrote: > Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch > without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it > fixes things with the ld you use? The build completes with no errors. Haven't actually booted it though. Gets my vote... Chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: build failure on powerpc with current -git @ 2008-10-22 17:49 ` Chris Friesen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Chris Friesen @ 2008-10-22 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras; +Cc: Stephen Rothwell, linuxppc-dev, Linux kernel Paul Mackerras wrote: > Chris, could you try just the following change (my previous patch > without the arch/powerpc/boot/wrapper change) and let me know if it > fixes things with the ld you use? The build completes with no errors. Haven't actually booted it though. Gets my vote... Chris ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-23 0:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2008-10-17 19:32 build failure on powerpc with current -git Chris Friesen 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely 2008-10-18 6:49 ` Grant Likely 2008-10-21 5:33 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-10-21 8:13 ` Stephen Rothwell 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-10-22 3:58 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-10-22 15:19 ` Hollis Blanchard 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen 2008-10-22 17:50 ` Chris Friesen 2008-10-23 0:19 ` Josh Boyer 2008-10-23 0:19 ` Josh Boyer 2008-10-22 15:21 ` Hollis Blanchard 2008-10-22 17:49 ` Chris Friesen 2008-10-22 17:49 ` Chris Friesen
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.