From: "Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn1313@gmail.com>,
Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:58:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48c79dc3d84f55dec4cd2199cc4152e146bee0ba.1608609498.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.820.v5.git.1608609498.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
From: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
The logic added to check for negative pathspec match by c0192df630
(refspec: add support for negative refspecs, 2020-09-30) looks at
refspec->src assuming it is never NULL, however when
remote.origin.push is set to ":", then refspec->src is NULL,
causing a segfault within strcmp.
Tell git to handle matching refspec by adding the needle to the
set of positively matched refspecs, since matching ":" refspecs
match anything as src.
Add test for matching refspec pushes fetch-negative-refspec
both individually and in combination with a negative refspec.
Signed-off-by: Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn@dropbox.com>
---
remote.c | 10 ++++--
t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/remote.c b/remote.c
index 8be67f0892b..4f1a4099f1a 100644
--- a/remote.c
+++ b/remote.c
@@ -751,9 +751,13 @@ static int query_matches_negative_refspec(struct refspec *rs, struct refspec_ite
if (match_name_with_pattern(key, needle, value, &expn_name))
string_list_append_nodup(&reversed, expn_name);
- } else {
- if (!strcmp(needle, refspec->src))
- string_list_append(&reversed, refspec->src);
+ } else if (refspec->matching) {
+ /* For the special matching refspec, any query should match */
+ string_list_append(&reversed, needle);
+ } else if (!refspec->src) {
+ BUG("refspec->src should not be null here");
+ } else if (!strcmp(needle, refspec->src)) {
+ string_list_append(&reversed, refspec->src);
}
}
diff --git a/t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh b/t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh
index 8c61e28fec8..2f3b064d0e7 100755
--- a/t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh
+++ b/t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh
@@ -186,4 +186,55 @@ test_expect_success "fetch --prune with negative refspec" '
)
'
+test_expect_success "push with matching : and negative refspec" '
+ # Manually handle cleanup, since test_config is not
+ # prepared to take arbitrary options like --add
+ test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
+
+ # For convenience, we use "master" to refer to the name of
+ # the branch created by default in the following.
+ #
+ # Repositories two and one have branches other than "master"
+ # but they have no overlap---"master" is the only one that
+ # is shared between them. And the master branch at two is
+ # behind the master branch at one by one commit.
+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push : &&
+
+ # A matching push tries to update master, fails due to non-ff
+ test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
+
+ # "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
+ current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
+
+ # If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
+ # to push and succeed.
+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
+
+ # With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op. Nothing gets
+ # pushed and it succeeds.
+ git -C two push -v one
+'
+
+test_expect_success "push with matching +: and negative refspec" '
+ test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
+
+ # The same set-up as above, whose side-effect was a no-op.
+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push +: &&
+
+ # The push refuses to update the "master" branch that is checked
+ # out in the "one" repository, even when it is forced with +:
+ test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
+
+ # "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
+ current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
+
+ # If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
+ # to push and succeed
+ git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
+
+ # With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op. Nothing gets
+ # pushed and it succeeds.
+ git -C two push -v one
+'
+
test_done
--
gitgitgadget
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-22 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-19 17:23 [PATCH] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19 9:28 ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-20 2:57 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] test-lib-functions: handle --add in test_config Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 7:07 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-21 20:08 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22 0:00 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22 0:13 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22 2:25 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22 5:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21 7:20 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 2:05 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 2:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22 2:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22 1:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 3:58 ` Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget [this message]
2021-02-19 9:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Jacob Keller
2020-12-22 3:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22 6:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 23:56 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-24 0:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-11 20:22 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2021-01-12 2:01 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48c79dc3d84f55dec4cd2199cc4152e146bee0ba.1608609498.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nipunn1313@gmail.com \
--cc=nipunn@dropbox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.