All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	Nipunn Koorapati <nipunn1313@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:58:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <pull.820.v5.git.1608609498.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.820.v4.git.1608599513.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

If remote.origin.push was set to ":", git segfaults during a push operation,
due to bad parsing logic in query_matches_negative_refspec. Per bisect, the
bug was introduced in: c0192df630 (refspec: add support for negative
refspecs, 2020-09-30)

We found this issue when rolling out git 2.29 at Dropbox - as several folks
had "push = :" in their configuration. I based my diff off the master
branch, but also confirmed that it patches cleanly onto maint - if the
maintainers would like to also fix the segfault on 2.29

Update since Patch series V1:

 * Handled matching refspec explicitly
 * Added testing for "+:" case
 * Added comment explaining how the two loops work together

Update since Patch series V2

 * style suggestion in remote.c
 * Use test_config
 * Add test for a case with a matching refspec + negative refspec
 * Fix test_config to work with --add
 * Updated commit message to describe what git is told to do instead of
   segfaulting

Update since Patch series V3

 * Removed commit modifying test_config
 * Remove segfault-related comments in test
 * Consolidate the three tests to two tests (1st and 3rd test overlapped in
   functionality)
 * Base the patch series on the maint branch - since the bug affects 2.29.2

Update since Patch series V4

 * Squashed in Junio's patch to handle non-master named branches
 * Explicitly use test_unconfig

Appreciate the reviews from Junio and Eric! Happy Holidays!

Nipunn Koorapati (2):
  negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
  negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec

 remote.c                          | 16 ++++++++--
 t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


base-commit: 898f80736c75878acc02dc55672317fcc0e0a5a6
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-820%2Fnipunn1313%2Fnk%2Fpush-refspec-segfault-v5
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-820/nipunn1313/nk/push-refspec-segfault-v5
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/820

Range-diff vs v4:

 1:  e59ff29bdef ! 1:  48c79dc3d84 negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec
     @@ t/t5582-fetch-negative-refspec.sh: test_expect_success "fetch --prune with negat
       '
       
      +test_expect_success "push with matching : and negative refspec" '
     -+	test_config -C two remote.one.push : &&
     -+	# Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
     ++	# Manually handle cleanup, since test_config is not
     ++	# prepared to take arbitrary options like --add
     ++	test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
     ++
     ++	# For convenience, we use "master" to refer to the name of
     ++	# the branch created by default in the following.
     ++	#
     ++	# Repositories two and one have branches other than "master"
     ++	# but they have no overlap---"master" is the only one that
     ++	# is shared between them.  And the master branch at two is
     ++	# behind the master branch at one by one commit.
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push : &&
     ++
     ++	# A matching push tries to update master, fails due to non-ff
      +	test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
      +
     ++	# "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
     ++	current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
     ++
      +	# If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
      +	# to push and succeed.
     -+	# We do not need test_config here as we are updating remote.one.push
     -+	# again. The teardown of the first test_config will do --unset-all
     -+	git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
     -+	git -C two push one
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
     ++
     ++	# With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op.  Nothing gets
     ++	# pushed and it succeeds.
     ++	git -C two push -v one
      +'
      +
      +test_expect_success "push with matching +: and negative refspec" '
     -+	test_config -C two remote.one.push +: &&
     -+	# Fails to push master w/ tip behind counterpart
     ++	test_when_finished "test_unconfig -C two remote.one.push" &&
     ++
     ++	# The same set-up as above, whose side-effect was a no-op.
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push +: &&
     ++
     ++	# The push refuses to update the "master" branch that is checked
     ++	# out in the "one" repository, even when it is forced with +:
      +	test_must_fail git -C two push one &&
      +
     ++	# "master" may actually not be "master"---find it out.
     ++	current=$(git symbolic-ref HEAD) &&
     ++
      +	# If master is in negative refspec, then the command will not attempt
      +	# to push and succeed
     -+	git -C two config --add remote.one.push ^refs/heads/master &&
     -+	git -C two push one
     ++	git -C two config --add remote.one.push "^$current" &&
     ++
     ++	# With "master" excluded, this push is a no-op.  Nothing gets
     ++	# pushed and it succeeds.
     ++	git -C two push -v one
      +'
      +
       test_done
 2:  20575407cc0 = 2:  1f9af0e991c negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec

-- 
gitgitgadget

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-22  3:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-19 17:23 [PATCH] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 18:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-02-19  9:28   ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-19 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-19 21:58   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-20  2:57     ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-19 21:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  2:05   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 1/3] test-lib-functions: handle --add in test_config Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  7:07       ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21 19:00         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-21 20:08           ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22  0:00             ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22  0:13               ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-22  2:25                 ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-22  5:19                   ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 2/3] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-21  7:20       ` Eric Sunshine
2020-12-21  2:05     ` [PATCH v3 3/3] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  1:11     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  1:11       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  2:08         ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22  2:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2020-12-22  1:11       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  3:58       ` Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget [this message]
2020-12-22  3:58         ` [PATCH v5 1/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2021-02-19  9:32           ` Jacob Keller
2020-12-22  3:58         ` [PATCH v5 2/2] negative-refspec: improve comment on query_matches_negative_refspec Nipunn Koorapati via GitGitGadget
2020-12-22  6:48         ` [PATCH v5 0/2] negative-refspec: fix segfault on : refspec Junio C Hamano
2020-12-23 23:56           ` Nipunn Koorapati
2020-12-24  0:00             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-01-11 20:22               ` Nipunn Koorapati
2021-01-12  2:01                 ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=pull.820.v5.git.1608609498.gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --to=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nipunn1313@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.