All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
To: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 10:40:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4906EC24.30201@cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f17812d70810271802v75b08712l4ab243802f59ecce@mail.gmail.com>

Good idea, patch to follow.

Jonathan
> (Resend with corrected e-mail address of Liam)
> 
> I'd suggest making this a static inline function then,
> e.g. to_da903x_dev(rdev), which will help both
> readability and future modifications.
> 
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Jonathan Cameron
>> <Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Changes the device registration part of the probe function to supply the
>>> regulator device rather than its parent (the mfd device) as this caused
>>> problems when the regulator core attempted to find constraints associated
>>> with the regulators.
>>>
>>> Signed-of-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This is quickest and simplest way to fix this bug. There may be better
>>> ways of doing it, but they all require considerably more substantial
>>> changes to the driver.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
>>> index 3688e33..f928aa1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/regulator/da903x.c
>>> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct regulator_dev
>>> *rdev,
>>>                   int min_uV, int max_uV)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t val, mask;
>>>
>>>     if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
>>> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ static int da903x_set_ldo_voltage(struct
>>> regulator_dev *rdev,
>>>  static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t val, mask;
>>>     int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static int da903x_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev
>>> *rdev)
>>>  static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>
>>>     return da903x_set_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
>>>                     1 << info->enable_bit);
>>> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int da903x_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>
>>>     return da903x_clr_bits(da9034_dev, info->enable_reg,
>>>                     1 << info->enable_bit);
>>> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int da903x_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  static int da903x_is_enabled(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t reg_val;
>>>     int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int da9034_set_dvc_voltage(struct
>>> regulator_dev *rdev,
>>>                   int min_uV, int max_uV)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t val, mask;
>>>     int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct
>>> regulator_dev *rdev,
>>>                     int min_uV, int max_uV)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t val, mask;
>>>
>>>     if (check_range(info, min_uV, max_uV)) {
>>> @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ static int da9034_set_ldo12_voltage(struct
>>> regulator_dev *rdev,
>>>  static int da9034_get_ldo12_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>>>  {
>>>     struct da903x_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>>> -    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent;
>>> +    struct device *da9034_dev = rdev_get_dev(rdev)->parent->parent;
>>>     uint8_t val, mask;
>>>     int ret;
>>>
>>> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int __devinit da903x_regulator_probe(struct
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>     if (ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO1 || ri->desc.id == DA9030_ID_LDO15)
>>>         ri->desc.ops = &da9030_regulator_ldo1_15_ops;
>>>
>>> -    rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, pdev->dev.parent, ri);
>>> +    rdev = regulator_register(&ri->desc, &pdev->dev, ri);
>>>     if (IS_ERR(rdev)) {
>>>         dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register regulator %s\n",
>>>                 ri->desc.name);
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers
>> - eric
>>
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-28 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-24 15:47 Da903x regulator driver. Bug? Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 17:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 18:24   ` Liam Girdwood
2008-10-24 18:53     ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-24 19:44       ` Mark Brown
2008-10-27 15:29 ` [PATCH] da903x regulator bug fix Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-28  1:01   ` Eric Miao
2008-10-28  1:02     ` Eric Miao
2008-10-28 10:40       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2008-10-28 11:03       ` Jonathan Cameron
2008-10-28 11:19         ` Liam Girdwood
2008-10-28 12:21           ` Eric Miao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4906EC24.30201@cam.ac.uk \
    --to=jic23@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.y.miao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.