Re: [patch] remove vcpu_info array v5

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

Glauber Costa wrote:
>>> Yes, but I believe the whole point of jes patches is to remove those
>>> limits.
>>>
>>>       
>> So we could linear search huge lists?  Or code hashes where arrays would do?
>>  No, sir.
>>
>> An array of pointers statically sized at MAX_CPUS is fine.  If you insist,
>> you can realloc() it on demand.
>>     
>
> Yes, I agree. having MAX_CPUS is fine, and if we need to, we can increase that.
> but again: then the direction of the flow is better be have qemu to
> use a env array,
> and then we can use the same method for kvm.
>   

I only object to the linear search; not to the folding of vcpu_info into 
CPUState.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function