All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	ananth@in.ibm.com, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address()
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:46:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4912222F.9040605@ct.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <491212C0.4030900@redhat.com>

Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> actually, calling __module_text_address() in __register_kprobe() is
>> better after my fix applied. but I found that a line have exceed
>> 80 characters, so I don't use __module_text_address().
> 
> I don't think that coding style is a good reason not to fix it...:(
> 
> Anyway, I think the issue that you pointed must be fixed.
> I found there were same kind of issues in kprobes and updated
> your patch. This includes fixes which Hiroshi pointed out.
> 
> Thanks a lot! :)
> 
> __register_kprobe() can be preempted after checking probing address
> but before try_module_get() or module_put(), and in this interval the
> module can be unloaded. In that case, try_module_get(probed_mod) or
> module_put(mod) will access to invalid address, or kprobe will probe
> invalid address.
> 
> this patch uses preempt_disable() to protect it and use
> __module_text_address() and __kernel_text_address().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/kprobes.c |   21 +++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.28-rc3.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
> +++ 2.6.28-rc3/kernel/kprobes.c
> @@ -613,30 +613,37 @@ static int __kprobes __register_kprobe(s
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	p->addr = addr;
> 
> -	if (!kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> -	    in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr))
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	if (!__kernel_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
> +	    in_kprobes_functions((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
> +		preempt_enable();
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> 
>  	p->mod_refcounted = 0;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Check if are we probing a module.
>  	 */
> -	probed_mod = module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
> +	probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
>  	if (probed_mod) {
> -		struct module *calling_mod = module_text_address(called_from);
> +		struct module *calling_mod;
> +		calling_mod = __module_text_address(called_from);
>  		/*
>  		 * We must allow modules to probe themself and in this case
>  		 * avoid incrementing the module refcount, so as to allow
>  		 * unloading of self probing modules.
>  		 */
>  		if (calling_mod && calling_mod != probed_mod) {

One question, off topic.
If calling_mod is NULL, no try_module_get(), is that OK?

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto

> -			if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod)))
> +			if (unlikely(!try_module_get(probed_mod))) {
> +				preempt_enable();
>  				return -EINVAL;
> +			}
>  			p->mod_refcounted = 1;
>  		} else
>  			probed_mod = NULL;
>  	}
> +	preempt_enable();
> 
>  	p->nmissed = 0;
>  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->list);
> @@ -718,9 +725,11 @@ static void __kprobes __unregister_kprob
>  	struct kprobe *old_p;
> 
>  	if (p->mod_refcounted) {
> -		mod = module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long)p->addr);
>  		if (mod)
>  			module_put(mod);
> +		preempt_enable();
>  	}
> 
>  	if (list_empty(&p->list) || list_is_singular(&p->list)) {
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-05 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04  5:56 [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-04 14:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-05  0:53   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05  1:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05  1:47   ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 19:30     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 21:40     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 22:46       ` Hiroshi Shimamoto [this message]
2008-11-05 23:07         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-06  0:06           ` [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  1:00             ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07  2:28               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  2:54                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07  4:46                   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-06  1:06       ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-06 15:37         ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07  0:32           ` Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4912222F.9040605@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --to=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.