From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com, ananth@in.ibm.com,
laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:28:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4913A7B2.9000609@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081106170023.d5349c42.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> I do not understand this description "Get probed module even if the
> caller is in the kernel core code".
>
> What bug is being fixed here? What is the kernel behaviour before and
> after the patch?
When someone called register_*probe() from kernel-core code(not from
module) and that probes a kernel module, users can remove the probed
module because kprobe doesn't increment reference counter of the module.
(on the other hand, if the kernel-module calls register_*probe,
kprobe increments refcount of the probed module.)
Currently, we have no register_*probe() calling from kernel-core(except
smoke-test, but the smoke-test doesn't probe module), so there is no
real bugs. But the logic is wrong(or not fair) and it can causes a
problem when someone might want to probe module from kernel.
After this patch is applied, even if someone put register_*probe() call
in the kernel-core code, it increments the reference counter of the
probed module, and it prevents user to remove the module until stopping
probing it.
> Was the bug present in 2.6.27, 2.6.26 etc? Or was it a post-2.6.28
> regression?
Hmm, it might be an enhancement, because currently the kernel doesn't
have real bugs.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-07 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 5:56 [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-04 14:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-05 0:53 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 1:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 1:47 ` Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-05 19:30 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 21:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-05 22:46 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-11-05 23:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-06 0:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: bugfix: try_module_get even if calling_mod is NULL Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 1:00 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 2:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2008-11-07 2:54 ` Andrew Morton
2008-11-07 4:46 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2008-11-06 1:06 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() Lai Jiangshan
2008-11-06 15:37 ` [PATCH] kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address() Masami Hiramatsu
2008-11-07 0:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4913A7B2.9000609@redhat.com \
--to=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.