Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: don't set NETIF_F_FRAGLIST

[Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>]

Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> We don't handle skb_shared_info->frag_list, so we shouldn't
> be setting the NETIF_F_FRAGLIST flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 0196a0d..9d4fdad 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
>  	/* Do we support "hardware" checksums? */
>  	if (csum && virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM)) {
>  		/* This opens up the world of extra features. */
> -		dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG|NETIF_F_FRAGLIST;
> +		dev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM|NETIF_F_SG;
>  		if (gso && virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GSO)) {
>  			dev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_UFO
>  				| NETIF_F_TSO_ECN | NETIF_F_TSO6;

applied this and tun patch