From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, rostedt@goodmis.org, peterz@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:31:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4919DD9B.1070104@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081111142323.28477.41235.stgit@dev.haskins.net>
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Hi Ingo, Steven, Peter,
> This series applies roughly to mainline as an enhancement to the sched_rt
> logic. Peter and I were discussing some of the unecessary overhead in
> pull_rt_tasks() via IRC, and this is my RFC attempt to address the problem.
>
> I have built/booted this on a 4-way C2D Xeon box and it passes preempt-test.
At first blush it looks reasonable, but do you have any performance numbers?
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-11 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-11 14:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] sched: track the next-highest priority on each runqueue Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] sched: use highest_prio.curr for pull threshold Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 14:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] sched: use highest_prio.next to optimize pull operations Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 17:56 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Ingo Molnar
2008-11-11 18:51 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-11-11 19:31 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2008-11-11 19:50 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 20:01 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 20:30 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-12-03 20:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] sched: track next-highest priority (was "Series short discription") Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 20:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Series short description Ingo Molnar
2008-12-03 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] sched: track next-highest priority Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] sched: cleanup inc/dec_rt_tasks Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] sched: track the next-highest priority on each runqueue Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 4:22 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] sched: use highest_prio.curr for pull threshold Gregory Haskins
2008-12-03 22:09 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] sched: use highest_prio.next to optimize pull operations Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] sched: track next-highest priority Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] sched: cleanup inc/dec_rt_tasks Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] sched: track the next-highest priority on each runqueue Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] sched: use highest_prio.curr for pull threshold Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-12-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] sched: use highest_prio.next to optimize pull operations Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4919DD9B.1070104@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.