Re: [RFC v9][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space

[Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>]

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Oren Laadan (orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org):
>> +/**
>> + * cr_fill_fname - return pathname of a given file
>> + * @path: path name
>> + * @root: relative root
>> + * @buf: buffer for pathname
>> + * @n: buffer length (in) and pathname length (out)
>> + */
>> +static char *
>> +cr_fill_fname(struct path *path, struct path *root, char *buf, int *n)
>> +{
>> +	struct path tmp = *root;
>> +	char *fname;
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!buf);
>> +	fname = __d_path(path, &tmp, buf, *n);
>> +	if (!IS_ERR(fname))
>> +		*n = (buf + (*n) - fname);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * FIXME: if __d_path() changed these, it must have stepped out of
>> +	 * init's namespace. Since currently we require a unified namespace
>> +	 * within the container: simply fail.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (tmp.mnt != root->mnt || tmp.dentry != root->dentry)
>> +		fname = ERR_PTR(-EBADF);
> 
> ...
> 
>> +static int cr_ctx_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
>> +{
>> +	ctx->root_pid = pid;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * assume checkpointer is in container's root vfs
>> +	 * FIXME: this works for now, but will change with real containers
>> +	 */
>> +	ctx->vfsroot = &current->fs->root;
>> +	path_get(ctx->vfsroot);
> 
> Hi Oren,
> 
> Is there really any good reason to use current->fs->root rather
> than ctx->root_task->fs->root here?

Oops, that's a leftover from before supporting external checkpoint.
Will fix.

> 
> The way I'm testing, the checkpointer is in fact in a different
> container, so the root passed into cr_fill_fname() is different
> from the container's root, so cr_fill_fname() always returns me
> -EBADF.
> 

Thanks,

Oren.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html