From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:52:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492211C5.7090302@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081118004918.GA19416@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
Venki Pallipadi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:18:16PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
>>> All C-states higher than C1.
>>>
>> Including C2? If so, the TSC is unusable since C2 can be invoked
>> asynchronously by the chipset.
>>
>
> No. Not on Intel CPUs atleast. On Intel CPUs, we enter C-states only on
> hlt or mwait. C1 is always C1 or C1E, where TSC always runs.
> C2, C3, ... implementation vary depending on processor and TSC may or may
> not run. This 0x80000007 feature bit basically says TSC is going to run
> during any C-state.
>
I was under the impression that C2 was invoked by the chipset on a
thermal condition, at least on older (P3-era) processors. Is that no
longer true? If what you say is above (HLT and MWAIT only), then *was*
it ever true?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-18 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-18 0:11 [PATCH] x86: Support always running TSC on Intel CPUs Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 0:16 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-11-18 0:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 0:49 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 0:52 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-11-18 1:05 ` Venki Pallipadi
2008-11-18 1:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 3:26 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-18 3:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-18 14:55 ` Joe Korty
2008-11-18 16:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-18 16:47 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2008-11-18 16:54 ` Joe Korty
2008-11-18 17:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-18 16:48 ` Joe Korty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492211C5.7090302@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.