From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Cc: Grant Erickson <gerickson@nuovations.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>,
Wolfgang Denx <wd@denx.de>,
linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Add Alternative Log Buffer Support for printk Messages
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:19:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492C5DC2.9040402@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5e2fc790811251207g38d429f3q4eb698b92162d6@mail.gmail.com>
Matt Sealey wrote:
> Yes, there's FirmWorks, CodeGen SmartFirmware, IBM SLOF and OpenBIOS..
> they're all linked from the OpenBIOS website (along with a bunch of the
> documentation from http://www.openfirmware.org in more-readable formats
> like PDF)
>
> http://www.openbios.org/
>
>
> But here's the real question; why do you need an opensource
> implementation? Curiosity?
That, and I prefer Free *ware whenever that's an option. :)
Nothing against the commercial alternatives, of course. But I'm
already doing my own heavy lifting, because my platforms are all
full-custom with very limited production runs. Since I'm into the
guts of all my code anyway, I'm not inclined to outsource a bootloader
development effort.
Just trying to figure out where the walls of this "sandbox" are. I've
been aware of the concept of Open Firmware for a while, but haven't
really looked into it before now--- mostly because my impression until
now was that the available implementations were both closed-source,
and not supporting embedded, non-PPC targets like ARM.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>
To: Matt Sealey <matt@genesi-usa.com>
Cc: linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>, Wolfgang Denx <wd@denx.de>,
Grant Erickson <gerickson@nuovations.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Add Alternative Log Buffer Support for printk Messages
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:19:14 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <492C5DC2.9040402@billgatliff.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5e2fc790811251207g38d429f3q4eb698b92162d6@mail.gmail.com>
Matt Sealey wrote:
> Yes, there's FirmWorks, CodeGen SmartFirmware, IBM SLOF and OpenBIOS..
> they're all linked from the OpenBIOS website (along with a bunch of the
> documentation from http://www.openfirmware.org in more-readable formats
> like PDF)
>
> http://www.openbios.org/
>
>
> But here's the real question; why do you need an opensource
> implementation? Curiosity?
That, and I prefer Free *ware whenever that's an option. :)
Nothing against the commercial alternatives, of course. But I'm
already doing my own heavy lifting, because my platforms are all
full-custom with very limited production runs. Since I'm into the
guts of all my code anyway, I'm not inclined to outsource a bootloader
development effort.
Just trying to figure out where the walls of this "sandbox" are. I've
been aware of the concept of Open Firmware for a while, but haven't
really looked into it before now--- mostly because my impression until
now was that the available implementations were both closed-source,
and not supporting embedded, non-PPC targets like ARM.
b.g.
--
Bill Gatliff
bgat@billgatliff.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-25 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 18:34 [PATCH/RFC] Add Alternative Log Buffer Support for printk Messages Grant Erickson
2008-11-25 18:34 ` Grant Erickson
2008-11-25 18:53 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 18:53 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 18:55 ` Josh Boyer
2008-11-25 18:55 ` Josh Boyer
2008-11-25 19:01 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 19:01 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 19:04 ` Grant Erickson
2008-11-25 19:31 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 19:31 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 19:51 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-25 19:51 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-25 20:07 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 20:07 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 20:17 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-25 20:17 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-25 20:46 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 20:46 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 20:19 ` Bill Gatliff [this message]
2008-11-25 20:19 ` Bill Gatliff
2008-11-25 20:54 ` David VomLehn
2008-11-25 20:54 ` David VomLehn
2008-11-25 21:45 ` David Brownell
2008-11-25 21:45 ` David Brownell
2008-11-26 20:57 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-26 20:57 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-25 20:14 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-25 20:14 ` Grant Likely
2008-11-25 21:05 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-11-25 21:14 ` Matt Sealey
2008-11-26 1:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-11-26 1:23 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-01-07 0:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-07 2:11 ` Grant Erickson
2009-01-07 2:11 ` Grant Erickson
2009-01-07 2:11 ` Grant Erickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=492C5DC2.9040402@billgatliff.com \
--to=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=gerickson@nuovations.com \
--cc=linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=matt@genesi-usa.com \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.