[PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Philip Langdale]

The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.

The existing code assumes that if a cardbus controller is,
present, then it must be the one to manipulate - but the real
rule is that you manipulate PCI function 0. This patch adds an
additional constraint that the target must be function 0.

Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
---

  ricoh_mmc.c |   17 +++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
index a16d760..be9e7b3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
@@ -11,9 +11,10 @@

  /*
   * This is a conceptually ridiculous driver, but it is required by the way
- * the Ricoh multi-function R5C832 works. This chip implements firewire
- * and four different memory card controllers. Two of those controllers are
- * an SDHCI controller and a proprietary MMC controller. The linux SDHCI
+ * the Ricoh multi-function chips (R5CXXX) work. These chips implement
+ * the four main memory card controllers (SD, MMC, MS, xD) and one or both
+ * of cardbus or firewire. It happens that they implement SD and MMC
+ * support as separate controllers (and PCI functions). The linux SDHCI
   * driver supports MMC cards but the chip detects MMC cards in hardware
   * and directs them to the MMC controller - so the SDHCI driver never sees
   * them. To get around this, we must disable the useless MMC controller.
@@ -21,8 +22,10 @@
   * a detection event occurs immediately, even if the MMC card is already
   * in the reader.
   *
- * The relevant registers live on the firewire function, so this is unavoidably
- * ugly. Such is life.
+ * It seems to be the case that the relevant PCI registers to deactivate the
+ * MMC controller live on PCI function 0, which might be the cardbus controller
+ * or the firewire controller, depending on the particular chip in question. As
+ * such, it makes what this driver has to do unavoidably ugly. Such is life.
   */

  #include <linux/pci.h>
@@ -143,6 +146,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
  		pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
  			PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, fw_dev))) {
  		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
+		    PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
  		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
  			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
  				return -ENODEV;
@@ -160,6 +164,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
  	    (fw_dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
  					PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832, fw_dev))) {
  		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
+		    PCI_FUNC(fw_dev->devfn) == 0 &&
  		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
  			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
  				return -ENODEV;
@@ -172,7 +177,7 @@ static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,

  	if (!ctrlfound) {
  		printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
-		       ": Main firewire function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
+		       ": Main Ricoh function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
  		return -ENODEV;
  	}

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Mathias Weyland]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:42:57AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:

Hello

> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.

I'm confirming that my latest generation laptop now works with your
patch. 

Best regards

Matt

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Pierre Ossman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1074 bytes --]

On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:42:57 -0800
Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org> wrote:

> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> 
> The existing code assumes that if a cardbus controller is,
> present, then it must be the one to manipulate - but the real
> rule is that you manipulate PCI function 0. This patch adds an
> additional constraint that the target must be function 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org>
> ---

Mathias, please try to test this ASAP so that I can push it to Linus
for .28 (provided it works).

Frank, if possibly it would be useful if you could also test this on
the hardware you wrote your patch for. Just so we don't break
anything. :)

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Frans Pop]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 747 bytes --]

> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.

Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has 
been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a 
patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.

A fixed up version of Matthew's patch (not signed off) rebased against 
current mainline git is attached below. It does not include the changes 
proposed here.

Original bug report: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/28/90
Matthew's analysis and patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/29/87
Test results with patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/29/195

Cheers,
FJP


[-- Attachment #2: mmc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 11572 bytes --]

From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>

    mmc: Use a quirk to disable the proprietary Ricoh MMC controller
    
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
index dfa585f..31c5f63 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
@@ -48,23 +48,6 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_PCI
 
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
-config MMC_RICOH_MMC
-	tristate "Ricoh MMC Controller Disabler  (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-	depends on MMC_SDHCI_PCI
-	help
-	  This selects the disabler for the Ricoh MMC Controller. This
-	  proprietary controller is unnecessary because the SDHCI driver
-	  supports MMC cards on the SD controller, but if it is not
-	  disabled, it will steal the MMC cards away - rendering them
-	  useless. It is safe to select this driver even if you don't
-	  have a Ricoh based card reader.
-
-
-	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here:
-	  the module will be called ricoh_mmc.
-
-	  If unsure, say Y.
-
 config MMC_OMAP
 	tristate "TI OMAP Multimedia Card Interface support"
 	depends on ARCH_OMAP
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
index c794cc5..0676890 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_PXA)		+= pxamci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_IMX)		+= imxmmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI)		+= sdhci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI)	+= sdhci-pci.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_RICOH_MMC)	+= ricoh_mmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_WBSD)		+= wbsd.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_AU1X)		+= au1xmmc.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_OMAP)		+= omap.o
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
deleted file mode 100644
index a16d760..0000000
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/ricoh_mmc.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,257 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  ricoh_mmc.c - Dummy driver to disable the Rioch MMC controller.
- *
- *  Copyright (C) 2007 Philip Langdale, All Rights Reserved.
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
- * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
- * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at
- * your option) any later version.
- */
-
-/*
- * This is a conceptually ridiculous driver, but it is required by the way
- * the Ricoh multi-function R5C832 works. This chip implements firewire
- * and four different memory card controllers. Two of those controllers are
- * an SDHCI controller and a proprietary MMC controller. The linux SDHCI
- * driver supports MMC cards but the chip detects MMC cards in hardware
- * and directs them to the MMC controller - so the SDHCI driver never sees
- * them. To get around this, we must disable the useless MMC controller.
- * At that point, the SDHCI controller will start seeing them. As a bonus,
- * a detection event occurs immediately, even if the MMC card is already
- * in the reader.
- *
- * The relevant registers live on the firewire function, so this is unavoidably
- * ugly. Such is life.
- */
-
-#include <linux/pci.h>
-
-#define DRIVER_NAME "ricoh-mmc"
-
-static const struct pci_device_id pci_ids[] __devinitdata = {
-	{
-		.vendor		= PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
-		.device		= PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C843,
-		.subvendor	= PCI_ANY_ID,
-		.subdevice	= PCI_ANY_ID,
-	},
-	{ /* end: all zeroes */ },
-};
-
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, pci_ids);
-
-static int ricoh_mmc_disable(struct pci_dev *fw_dev)
-{
-	u8 write_enable;
-	u8 write_target;
-	u8 disable;
-
-	if (fw_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476) {
-		/* via RL5C476 */
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xB7, &disable);
-		if (disable & 0x02) {
-			printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-				": Controller already disabled. " \
-				"Nothing to do.\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, &write_enable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, 0xAA);
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, &write_target);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, 0xB7);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xB7, disable | 0x02);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, write_enable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, write_target);
-	} else {
-		/* via R5C832 */
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCB, &disable);
-		if (disable & 0x02) {
-			printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-			       ": Controller already disabled. " \
-				"Nothing to do.\n");
-			return -ENODEV;
-		}
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, &write_enable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, 0x57);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCB, disable | 0x02);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, write_enable);
-	}
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-	       ": Controller is now disabled.\n");
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int ricoh_mmc_enable(struct pci_dev *fw_dev)
-{
-	u8 write_enable;
-	u8 write_target;
-	u8 disable;
-
-	if (fw_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476) {
-		/* via RL5C476 */
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, &write_enable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, 0xAA);
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, &write_target);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, 0xB7);
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xB7, &disable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xB7, disable & ~0x02);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8E, write_enable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0x8D, write_target);
-	} else {
-		/* via R5C832 */
-
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, &write_enable);
-		pci_read_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCB, &disable);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, 0x57);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCB, disable & ~0x02);
-		pci_write_config_byte(fw_dev, 0xCA, write_enable);
-	}
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-	       ": Controller is now re-enabled.\n");
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int __devinit ricoh_mmc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
-				     const struct pci_device_id *ent)
-{
-	u8 rev;
-	u8 ctrlfound = 0;
-
-	struct pci_dev *fw_dev = NULL;
-
-	BUG_ON(pdev == NULL);
-	BUG_ON(ent == NULL);
-
-	pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &rev);
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-		": Ricoh MMC controller found at %s [%04x:%04x] (rev %x)\n",
-		pci_name(pdev), (int)pdev->vendor, (int)pdev->device,
-		(int)rev);
-
-	while ((fw_dev =
-		pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
-			PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476, fw_dev))) {
-		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
-		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
-			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
-				return -ENODEV;
-
-			pci_set_drvdata(pdev, fw_dev);
-
-			++ctrlfound;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	fw_dev = NULL;
-
-	while (!ctrlfound &&
-	    (fw_dev = pci_get_device(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
-					PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832, fw_dev))) {
-		if (PCI_SLOT(pdev->devfn) == PCI_SLOT(fw_dev->devfn) &&
-		    pdev->bus == fw_dev->bus) {
-			if (ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev) != 0)
-				return -ENODEV;
-
-			pci_set_drvdata(pdev, fw_dev);
-
-			++ctrlfound;
-		}
-	}
-
-	if (!ctrlfound) {
-		printk(KERN_WARNING DRIVER_NAME
-		       ": Main firewire function not found. Cannot disable controller.\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static void __devexit ricoh_mmc_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *fw_dev = NULL;
-
-	fw_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	BUG_ON(fw_dev == NULL);
-
-	ricoh_mmc_enable(fw_dev);
-
-	pci_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
-}
-
-static int ricoh_mmc_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *fw_dev = NULL;
-
-	fw_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	BUG_ON(fw_dev == NULL);
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": Suspending.\n");
-
-	ricoh_mmc_enable(fw_dev);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int ricoh_mmc_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *fw_dev = NULL;
-
-	fw_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
-	BUG_ON(fw_dev == NULL);
-
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": Resuming.\n");
-
-	ricoh_mmc_disable(fw_dev);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static struct pci_driver ricoh_mmc_driver = {
-	.name = 	DRIVER_NAME,
-	.id_table =	pci_ids,
-	.probe = 	ricoh_mmc_probe,
-	.remove =	__devexit_p(ricoh_mmc_remove),
-	.suspend =	ricoh_mmc_suspend,
-	.resume =	ricoh_mmc_resume,
-};
-
-/*****************************************************************************\
- *                                                                           *
- * Driver init/exit                                                          *
- *                                                                           *
-\*****************************************************************************/
-
-static int __init ricoh_mmc_drv_init(void)
-{
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME
-		": Ricoh MMC Controller disabling driver\n");
-	printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": Copyright(c) Philip Langdale\n");
-
-	return pci_register_driver(&ricoh_mmc_driver);
-}
-
-static void __exit ricoh_mmc_drv_exit(void)
-{
-	pci_unregister_driver(&ricoh_mmc_driver);
-}
-
-module_init(ricoh_mmc_drv_init);
-module_exit(ricoh_mmc_drv_exit);
-
-MODULE_AUTHOR("Philip Langdale <philipl@alumni.utexas.net>");
-MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Ricoh MMC Controller disabling driver");
-MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-
diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
index 5049a47..9939cab 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
@@ -1711,6 +1711,74 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM,
 			PCI_DEVICE_ID_NX2_5709S,
 			quirk_brcm_570x_limit_vpd);
 
+/*
+ * This is a conceptually ridiculous quirk, but it is required by the
+ * way the Ricoh multi-function R5C832 works. This chip implements
+ * firewire and four different memory card controllers. Two of those
+ * controllers are an SDHCI controller and a proprietary MMC
+ * controller. The linux SDHCI driver supports MMC cards but the chip
+ * detects MMC cards in hardware and directs them to the MMC
+ * controller - so the SDHCI driver never sees them. To get around
+ * this, we must disable the useless MMC controller.  At that point,
+ * the SDHCI controller will start seeing them. As a bonus, a
+ * detection event occurs immediately, even if the MMC card is already
+ * in the reader.
+ *
+ * The relevant registers live on the firewire function, so this is
+ * unavoidably ugly. Such is life.
+ */
+
+static void quirk_ricoh_rl5c476_mmc_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	u8 write_enable;
+	u8 write_target;
+	u8 disable;
+
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0xB7, &disable);
+
+	if (disable & 0x02)
+		/* Already disabled */
+		return;
+
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, &write_enable);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, 0xAA);
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, &write_target);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, 0xB7);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xB7, disable | 0x02);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8E, write_enable);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x8D, write_target);
+}
+
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
+			 PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476,
+			 quirk_ricoh_rl5c476_mmc_disable);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
+			       PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_RL5C476,
+			       quirk_ricoh_rl5c476_mmc_disable);
+
+static void quirk_ricoh_r5c832_mmc_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+	u8 disable;
+	u8 write_enable;
+
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0xCB, &disable);
+
+	if (disable & 0x02)
+		return;
+
+	pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0xCA, &write_enable);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xCA, 0x57);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xCB, disable | 0x02);
+	pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0xCA, write_enable);
+}
+
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
+			 PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832,
+			 quirk_ricoh_r5c832_mmc_disable);
+DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_RESUME_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_RICOH,
+			       PCI_DEVICE_ID_RICOH_R5C832,
+			       quirk_ricoh_r5c832_mmc_disable);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
 /* Some chipsets do not support MSI. We cannot easily rely on setting
  * PCI_BUS_FLAGS_NO_MSI in its bus flags because there are actually

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Philip Langdale]

Frans Pop wrote:
>> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
>> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
>> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> 
> Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has 
> been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a 
> patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.

Hmm. Well, I'm interested as to what Pierre thinks. He explicitly didn't
want a quirk when we originally looked at the problem and that's why
ricoh_mmc exists - but maybe this is a good enough reason to revisit that
decision.

--phil

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Pierre Ossman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1367 bytes --]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:42:20 -0800
Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org> wrote:

> Frans Pop wrote:
> >> The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> >> model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> >> primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> > 
> > Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has 
> > been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a 
> > patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.
> 
> Hmm. Well, I'm interested as to what Pierre thinks. He explicitly didn't
> want a quirk when we originally looked at the problem and that's why
> ricoh_mmc exists - but maybe this is a good enough reason to revisit that
> decision.
> 

Actually, what I didn't want was a _sdhci_ quirk. I'm fine with a PCI one. In fact,
that's probably the best approach as that register fiddling hides some
PCI devices, so it's best if it is done before enumeration.

(Side note: sdhci has now undergone the architectural change that would
allow a quirk like this, but the PCI version is probably still best)

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Matthew Garrett]

On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 06:42:20AM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote:
> Frans Pop wrote:
> >>The latest generation of laptops are shipping with a newer
> >>model of Ricoh chip where the firewire controller is the
> >>primary PCI function but a cardbus controller is also present.
> >
> >Note that the current separate ricoh_mmc disabling module approach has 
> >been shown to break during suspend/resume. Matthew Garret proposed a 
> >patch for that which (with minor fixups) I tested successfully.
> 
> Hmm. Well, I'm interested as to what Pierre thinks. He explicitly didn't
> want a quirk when we originally looked at the problem and that's why
> ricoh_mmc exists - but maybe this is a good enough reason to revisit that
> decision.

Thinking about it, it could possibly be handled by changing to 
suspend_noirq and resume_noirq rather than the normal suspend and resume 
functions? That ought to get the ordering constraints right. The problem 
occurs when ricoh_mmc suspends before sdhci and resumes after it.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Philip Langdale]

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> 
> Thinking about it, it could possibly be handled by changing to 
> suspend_noirq and resume_noirq rather than the normal suspend and resume 
> functions? That ought to get the ordering constraints right. The problem 
> occurs when ricoh_mmc suspends before sdhci and resumes after it.

I'll investigate that and see what happens.

--phil

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Pierre Ossman]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 795 bytes --]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 06:53:52 -0800
Philip Langdale <philipl@overt.org> wrote:

> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > 
> > Thinking about it, it could possibly be handled by changing to 
> > suspend_noirq and resume_noirq rather than the normal suspend and resume 
> > functions? That ought to get the ordering constraints right. The problem 
> > occurs when ricoh_mmc suspends before sdhci and resumes after it.
> 
> I'll investigate that and see what happens.
> 

Or you integrate it into sdhci_pci. Look at the register fiddling for
JMicron chips in there.

Rgds
-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
  Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
  for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
  encryption.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] ricoh_mmc: Handle newer models of Ricoh controllers

[Frank Seidel]

Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Frank, if possibly it would be useful if you could also test this on
> the hardware you wrote your patch for. Just so we don't break
> anything. :)

Unfortunately i don't have that or comparable hardware anymore here.
So i cannot test it currently, but i put it on my todo-list when i'm
able to catch it again.

Sorry,
Frank