All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oren Laadan <orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org>,
	containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:57:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49344FA5.90004@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228154412.2971.44.camel@nimitz>



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 10:53 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>> +static int cr_ctx_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
>>> +{
>>> +     ctx->root_pid = pid;
>>> +
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * assume checkpointer is in container's root vfs
>>> +      * FIXME: this works for now, but will change with real containers
>>> +      */
>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = &current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(ctx->vfsroot);
>> This is going to break as soon as you get another thread doing e.g. chroot(2)
>> while you are in there.
> 
> Yeah, we do need at least a read_lock(&current->fs->lock) to keep people
> from chroot()'ing underneath us.

True.
(while adapting older and safer code I omitted these tests with no reason).

> 
>> And it's a really, _really_ bad idea to take a
>> pointer to shared object, increment refcount on the current *contents* of
>> said object and assume that dropping refcount on the later contents of the
>> same will balance out.
> 
> Absolutely.  I assume you mean get_fs_struct(current) instead of
> path_get().

True.

Should change the type of ctx->vfsroot to not be a pointer, and do:

>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = *current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(&ctx->vfsroot);

and adjust accordingly in where the refcount is dropped.

What we need here is a reference point (this will change later when we handle
multiple fs-namespaces), which is the path of the "container root". Assuming
locking is correct so that current->fs does not change under us, it's enough
to get that path and later release that path.

BW, the current->fs is assumed to not change during the checkpoint; if it does,
then it's a mis-use of the checkpoint interface, and the resulting behavior
is undefined - restart is guaranteed to restore the exact old state even if
checkpoint succeeds.

Thanks,

Oren.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:57:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49344FA5.90004@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228154412.2971.44.camel@nimitz>



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 10:53 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>> +static int cr_ctx_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
>>> +{
>>> +     ctx->root_pid = pid;
>>> +
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * assume checkpointer is in container's root vfs
>>> +      * FIXME: this works for now, but will change with real containers
>>> +      */
>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = &current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(ctx->vfsroot);
>> This is going to break as soon as you get another thread doing e.g. chroot(2)
>> while you are in there.
> 
> Yeah, we do need at least a read_lock(&current->fs->lock) to keep people
> from chroot()'ing underneath us.

True.
(while adapting older and safer code I omitted these tests with no reason).

> 
>> And it's a really, _really_ bad idea to take a
>> pointer to shared object, increment refcount on the current *contents* of
>> said object and assume that dropping refcount on the later contents of the
>> same will balance out.
> 
> Absolutely.  I assume you mean get_fs_struct(current) instead of
> path_get().

True.

Should change the type of ctx->vfsroot to not be a pointer, and do:

>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = *current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(&ctx->vfsroot);

and adjust accordingly in where the refcount is dropped.

What we need here is a reference point (this will change later when we handle
multiple fs-namespaces), which is the path of the "container root". Assuming
locking is correct so that current->fs does not change under us, it's enough
to get that path and later release that path.

BW, the current->fs is assumed to not change during the checkpoint; if it does,
then it's a mis-use of the checkpoint interface, and the resulting behavior
is undefined - restart is guaranteed to restore the exact old state even if
checkpoint succeeds.

Thanks,

Oren.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v10][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:57:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49344FA5.90004@cs.columbia.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228154412.2971.44.camel@nimitz>



Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 10:53 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>> +static int cr_ctx_checkpoint(struct cr_ctx *ctx, pid_t pid)
>>> +{
>>> +     ctx->root_pid = pid;
>>> +
>>> +     /*
>>> +      * assume checkpointer is in container's root vfs
>>> +      * FIXME: this works for now, but will change with real containers
>>> +      */
>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = &current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(ctx->vfsroot);
>> This is going to break as soon as you get another thread doing e.g. chroot(2)
>> while you are in there.
> 
> Yeah, we do need at least a read_lock(&current->fs->lock) to keep people
> from chroot()'ing underneath us.

True.
(while adapting older and safer code I omitted these tests with no reason).

> 
>> And it's a really, _really_ bad idea to take a
>> pointer to shared object, increment refcount on the current *contents* of
>> said object and assume that dropping refcount on the later contents of the
>> same will balance out.
> 
> Absolutely.  I assume you mean get_fs_struct(current) instead of
> path_get().

True.

Should change the type of ctx->vfsroot to not be a pointer, and do:

>>> +     ctx->vfsroot = *current->fs->root;
>>> +     path_get(&ctx->vfsroot);

and adjust accordingly in where the refcount is dropped.

What we need here is a reference point (this will change later when we handle
multiple fs-namespaces), which is the path of the "container root". Assuming
locking is correct so that current->fs does not change under us, it's enough
to get that path and later release that path.

BW, the current->fs is assumed to not change during the checkpoint; if it does,
then it's a mis-use of the checkpoint interface, and the resulting behavior
is undefined - restart is guaranteed to restore the exact old state even if
checkpoint succeeds.

Thanks,

Oren.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-01 20:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-27  1:04 [RFC v10][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04 ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04 ` Oren Laadan
     [not found] ` <1227747884-14150-1-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 01/13] Create syscalls: sys_checkpoint, sys_restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 02/13] Checkpoint/restart: initial documentation Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]     ` <1227747884-14150-3-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28 10:45       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:45       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:45         ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:45         ` Al Viro
     [not found]         ` <20081128104554.GP28946-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 18:15           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 18:15           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 18:15             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 18:15             ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 03/13] General infrastructure for checkpoint restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 04/13] x86 support for checkpoint/restart Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 05/13] Dump memory address space Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]     ` <1227747884-14150-6-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28 10:53       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:53       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:53         ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:53         ` Al Viro
     [not found]         ` <20081128105351.GQ28946-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 18:00           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 18:00             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 18:00             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:57             ` Oren Laadan [this message]
2008-12-01 20:57               ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:57               ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:57             ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 18:00           ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 06/13] Restore " Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 07/13] Infrastructure for shared objects Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 08/13] Dump open file descriptors Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]     ` <1227747884-14150-9-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28 10:19       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:19         ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 10:19         ` Al Viro
     [not found]         ` <20081128101919.GO28946-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 17:47           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 17:47           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 17:47             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 17:47             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:23             ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:23               ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:23               ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]               ` <493447DD.7010102-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 20:51                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:51                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:51                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:51                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:02                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-01 21:02                   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-01 21:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-01 21:02                     ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]                     ` <alpine.LFD.2.00.0812011258390.3256-nfNrOhbfy2R17+2ddN/4kux8cNe9sq/dYPYVAmT7z5s@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 21:25                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:25                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:25                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:25                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:20                   ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:20                     ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:20                   ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:23             ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-28 10:19       ` Al Viro
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 09/13] Restore open file descriprtors Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]     ` <1227747884-14150-10-git-send-email-orenl-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28 11:27       ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 11:27         ` Al Viro
2008-11-28 11:27         ` Al Viro
     [not found]         ` <20081128112745.GR28946-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 19:22           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 19:22             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 19:22             ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:41             ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:41               ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 20:41               ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]               ` <49344C11.6090204-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 20:54                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:54                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:54                   ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:00                   ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:00                   ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:00                     ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 21:00                     ` Oren Laadan
     [not found]                     ` <49345086.4-eQaUEPhvms7ENvBUuze7eA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-01 21:07                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:07                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:07                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:31                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:31                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:31                           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:31                           ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 21:07                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:12                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:12                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:12                         ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-02  1:12                       ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:54                 ` Dave Hansen
2008-12-01 20:41             ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-01 19:22           ` Dave Hansen
2008-11-28 11:27       ` Al Viro
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 10/13] External checkpoint of a task other than ourself Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 11/13] Track in-kernel when we expect checkpoint/restart to work Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 12/13] Checkpoint multiple processes Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 13/13] Restart " Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04   ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-11-27  1:04     ` Oren Laadan
2008-12-03 23:58   ` [RFC v10][PATCH 00/13] Kernel based checkpoint/restart Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-03 23:58     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-03 23:58     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2008-12-03 23:58   ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49344FA5.90004@cs.columbia.edu \
    --to=orenl-eqauephvms7envbuuze7ea@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=torvalds-3NddpPZAyC0@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.