From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: removing all ur callback modes
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 12:22:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493BB1EB.5000004@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228385830.5092.43.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 12:43 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is an attempt at removing some of the hrtimer complexity by
>> reducing the number of callback modes to 1.
>>
>> This means that all hrtimer callback functions will be ran from HARD-irq
>> context.
>>
>> I went through all the 30 odd hrtimer callback functions in the kernel
>> and saw only one that I'm not quite sure of, which is the one in
>> net/can/bcm.c - hence I'm CC-ing the folks responsible for that code.
>>
Thanks Peter.
Indeed i assumed my hrtimer callbacks to run in soft-irq. I tried the
can-bcm protocol with Ingos current linux-2.6-sched-devel.git including
your patches and i did not see any issues so far. And i do not expect
any (recursion) problems with hrtimer_forward() in my code either.
But i'm not that familiar with the timer context's stuff, that i would
like guaranty that the functions i use in bcm_send_user() and in
bcm_can_tx() are always safe to be used in hard-irq context.
It would be nice, if you could give me some support by double checking
the correctness of the hard-irq context in the given functions.
Best regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-25 11:43 [RFC PATCH] hrtimer: removing all ur callback modes Peter Zijlstra
2008-11-25 14:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-25 15:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-04 10:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-04 10:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-07 11:22 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2008-12-07 12:59 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 11:00 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 15:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-12-09 13:32 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-12-09 8:07 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-09 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-09 10:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 22:46 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-31 8:32 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-12-08 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 16:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-08 16:18 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493BB1EB.5000004@hartkopp.net \
--to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.