From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, take2] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH might be too big
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:30:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493C1632.2000901@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081207090918.595627b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:25:45 +0100 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
>
>> In this second version I guarded hotcpu_notifier() call by
>> a #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>
>> I wonder why hotcpu_notifier() is not a null op if !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> [PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH might be too big
>>
>> For NR_CPUS >= 16 values, FBC_BATCH is 2*NR_CPUS
>>
>> Considering more and more distros are using high NR_CPUS values,
>> it makes sense to use a more sensible value for FBC_BATCH.
>>
>> A sensible value is 2*num_online_cpus(), with a minimum value of 32
>> (This minimum value helps branch prediction in __percpu_counter_add())
>>
>> We already have a hotcpu notifier, so we can adjust FBC_BATCH dynamically.
>
> Yup, anything using NR_CPUS is probably wrong.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> index 9007ccd..c42a184 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> @@ -24,11 +24,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
>> s32 *counters;
>> };
>>
>> -#if NR_CPUS >= 16
>> -#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*2)
>> -#else
>> -#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*4)
>> -#endif
>> +extern int FBC_BATCH;
>
> y:/usr/src/linux-2.6.28-rc7> grep -r FBC_BATCH . | wc -l
> 7
>
> Can we fix this properly please? It should now become lower case, and
> it was a pretty dopey name anyway - now would be a good time to improve
> it. `percpu_counter_batch'?
Yes
>
>> int percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
>> int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
>> diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> index a866389..e21ce7c 100644
>> --- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> +++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy);
>>
>> +int FBC_BATCH __read_mostly = 32;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(FBC_BATCH);
>> +
>> +static void compute_batch_value(void)
>> +{
>> + int nr = num_online_cpus();
>> +
>> + FBC_BATCH = max(32, nr*2);
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>> @@ -121,6 +131,7 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned int cpu;
>> struct percpu_counter *fbc;
>>
>> + compute_batch_value();
>> if (action != CPU_DEAD)
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>
>> @@ -139,11 +150,14 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> mutex_unlock(&percpu_counters_lock);
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>> }
>> +#endif
>>
>> static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
>> {
>> + compute_batch_value();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0);
>> +#endif
>> return 0;
>> }
>> module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
>> -#endif
>
> hm, now what's going on in there? We should be able to drop the #ifdef
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU from lib/percpu_counter.c altogether.
> hotcpu_notifier() will do the right thing, and the compiler should
> generate no code for percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback() if
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n.
>
> Do
>
> $EDITOR $(grep -l hotcpu_notifier */*.c)
>
> and you'll see lots of code gets it right, and lots of code gets it wrong.
I see nothing interesting, I must be blind.
lib/percpu_counter.c: In function 'percpu_counter_startup':
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: 'percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback' undeclared (first use in this function)
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [lib/percpu_counter.o] Error 1
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
compute_batch_value();
hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0); << ERROR >>
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
# grep hotcpu_notifier include/linux/cpu.h
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0) << ERROR >>
If changed to :
static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata percpu_counter_cpu_notifier = {
.notifier_call = percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback,
};
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
compute_batch_value();
register_hotcpu_notifier(&percpu_counter_cpu_notifier);
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
Then error is :
lib/percpu_counter.c:156: error: 'percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback' undeclared here (not in a function)
make[1]: *** [lib/percpu_counter.o] Error 1
So the only way seems to add an ugly
#define percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback NULL
Is is what you name "the right thing" ?
Thanks
[PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH should be a variable
For NR_CPUS >= 16 values, FBC_BATCH is 2*NR_CPUS
Considering more and more distros are using high NR_CPUS values,
it makes sense to use a more sensible value for FBC_BATCH.
A sensible value is 2*num_online_cpus(), with a minimum value of 32
(This minimum value helps branch prediction in __percpu_counter_add())
We already have a hotcpu notifier, so we can adjust FBC_BATCH dynamically.
We rename FBC_BATCH to percpu_counter_batch since its not a constant
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 6 +++---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 8 ++------
lib/percpu_counter.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index b0537c8..6c46c64 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1225,11 +1225,11 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-/* Each CPU can accumulate FBC_BATCH blocks in their local
+/* Each CPU can accumulate percpu_counter_batch blocks in their local
* counters. So we need to make sure we have free blocks more
- * than FBC_BATCH * nr_cpu_ids. Also add a window of 4 times.
+ * than percpu_counter_batch * nr_cpu_ids. Also add a window of 4 times.
*/
-#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK (4 * (FBC_BATCH * nr_cpu_ids))
+#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK (4 * (percpu_counter_batch * nr_cpu_ids))
#else
#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK 0
#endif
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index be21a5a..db661e7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_nonda_switch(struct super_block *sb)
/*
* switch to non delalloc mode if we are running low
* on free block. The free block accounting via percpu
- * counters can get slightly wrong with FBC_BATCH getting
+ * counters can get slightly wrong with percpu_counter_batch getting
* accumulated on each CPU without updating global counters
* Delalloc need an accurate free block accounting. So switch
* to non delalloc when we are near to error range.
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index 9007ccd..99de7a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -24,11 +24,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
s32 *counters;
};
-#if NR_CPUS >= 16
-#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*2)
-#else
-#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*4)
-#endif
+extern int percpu_counter_batch;
int percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
@@ -39,7 +35,7 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, FBC_BATCH);
+ __percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
index a866389..519b877 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy);
+int percpu_counter_batch __read_mostly = 32;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_batch);
+
+static void compute_batch_value(void)
+{
+ int nr = num_online_cpus();
+
+ percpu_counter_batch = max(32, nr*2);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
@@ -121,6 +131,7 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned int cpu;
struct percpu_counter *fbc;
+ compute_batch_value();
if (action != CPU_DEAD)
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -139,11 +150,14 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
mutex_unlock(&percpu_counters_lock);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
+#else
+#define percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback NULL
+#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
+ compute_batch_value();
hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0);
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
-#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, take2] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH might be too big
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:30:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <493C1632.2000901@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081207090918.595627b2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton a écrit :
> On Sun, 07 Dec 2008 10:25:45 +0100 Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> wrote:
>
>> In this second version I guarded hotcpu_notifier() call by
>> a #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>
>> I wonder why hotcpu_notifier() is not a null op if !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> [PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH might be too big
>>
>> For NR_CPUS >= 16 values, FBC_BATCH is 2*NR_CPUS
>>
>> Considering more and more distros are using high NR_CPUS values,
>> it makes sense to use a more sensible value for FBC_BATCH.
>>
>> A sensible value is 2*num_online_cpus(), with a minimum value of 32
>> (This minimum value helps branch prediction in __percpu_counter_add())
>>
>> We already have a hotcpu notifier, so we can adjust FBC_BATCH dynamically.
>
> Yup, anything using NR_CPUS is probably wrong.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> index 9007ccd..c42a184 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
>> @@ -24,11 +24,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
>> s32 *counters;
>> };
>>
>> -#if NR_CPUS >= 16
>> -#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*2)
>> -#else
>> -#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*4)
>> -#endif
>> +extern int FBC_BATCH;
>
> y:/usr/src/linux-2.6.28-rc7> grep -r FBC_BATCH . | wc -l
> 7
>
> Can we fix this properly please? It should now become lower case, and
> it was a pretty dopey name anyway - now would be a good time to improve
> it. `percpu_counter_batch'?
Yes
>
>> int percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
>> int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
>> diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> index a866389..e21ce7c 100644
>> --- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> +++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
>> @@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy);
>>
>> +int FBC_BATCH __read_mostly = 32;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(FBC_BATCH);
>> +
>> +static void compute_batch_value(void)
>> +{
>> + int nr = num_online_cpus();
>> +
>> + FBC_BATCH = max(32, nr*2);
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>> @@ -121,6 +131,7 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> unsigned int cpu;
>> struct percpu_counter *fbc;
>>
>> + compute_batch_value();
>> if (action != CPU_DEAD)
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>>
>> @@ -139,11 +150,14 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
>> mutex_unlock(&percpu_counters_lock);
>> return NOTIFY_OK;
>> }
>> +#endif
>>
>> static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
>> {
>> + compute_batch_value();
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0);
>> +#endif
>> return 0;
>> }
>> module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
>> -#endif
>
> hm, now what's going on in there? We should be able to drop the #ifdef
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU from lib/percpu_counter.c altogether.
> hotcpu_notifier() will do the right thing, and the compiler should
> generate no code for percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback() if
> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU=n.
>
> Do
>
> $EDITOR $(grep -l hotcpu_notifier */*.c)
>
> and you'll see lots of code gets it right, and lots of code gets it wrong.
I see nothing interesting, I must be blind.
lib/percpu_counter.c: In function 'percpu_counter_startup':
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: 'percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback' undeclared (first use in this function)
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
lib/percpu_counter.c:158: error: for each function it appears in.)
make[1]: *** [lib/percpu_counter.o] Error 1
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
compute_batch_value();
hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0); << ERROR >>
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
# grep hotcpu_notifier include/linux/cpu.h
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) { \
#define hotcpu_notifier(fn, pri) do { (void)(fn); } while (0) << ERROR >>
If changed to :
static struct notifier_block __cpuinitdata percpu_counter_cpu_notifier = {
.notifier_call = percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback,
};
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
compute_batch_value();
register_hotcpu_notifier(&percpu_counter_cpu_notifier);
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
Then error is :
lib/percpu_counter.c:156: error: 'percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback' undeclared here (not in a function)
make[1]: *** [lib/percpu_counter.o] Error 1
So the only way seems to add an ugly
#define percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback NULL
Is is what you name "the right thing" ?
Thanks
[PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH should be a variable
For NR_CPUS >= 16 values, FBC_BATCH is 2*NR_CPUS
Considering more and more distros are using high NR_CPUS values,
it makes sense to use a more sensible value for FBC_BATCH.
A sensible value is 2*num_online_cpus(), with a minimum value of 32
(This minimum value helps branch prediction in __percpu_counter_add())
We already have a hotcpu notifier, so we can adjust FBC_BATCH dynamically.
We rename FBC_BATCH to percpu_counter_batch since its not a constant
anymore.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 6 +++---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
include/linux/percpu_counter.h | 8 ++------
lib/percpu_counter.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index b0537c8..6c46c64 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1225,11 +1225,11 @@ do { \
} while (0)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-/* Each CPU can accumulate FBC_BATCH blocks in their local
+/* Each CPU can accumulate percpu_counter_batch blocks in their local
* counters. So we need to make sure we have free blocks more
- * than FBC_BATCH * nr_cpu_ids. Also add a window of 4 times.
+ * than percpu_counter_batch * nr_cpu_ids. Also add a window of 4 times.
*/
-#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK (4 * (FBC_BATCH * nr_cpu_ids))
+#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK (4 * (percpu_counter_batch * nr_cpu_ids))
#else
#define EXT4_FREEBLOCKS_WATERMARK 0
#endif
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index be21a5a..db661e7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2497,7 +2497,7 @@ static int ext4_nonda_switch(struct super_block *sb)
/*
* switch to non delalloc mode if we are running low
* on free block. The free block accounting via percpu
- * counters can get slightly wrong with FBC_BATCH getting
+ * counters can get slightly wrong with percpu_counter_batch getting
* accumulated on each CPU without updating global counters
* Delalloc need an accurate free block accounting. So switch
* to non delalloc when we are near to error range.
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
index 9007ccd..99de7a3 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
@@ -24,11 +24,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
s32 *counters;
};
-#if NR_CPUS >= 16
-#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*2)
-#else
-#define FBC_BATCH (NR_CPUS*4)
-#endif
+extern int percpu_counter_batch;
int percpu_counter_init(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
int percpu_counter_init_irq(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount);
@@ -39,7 +35,7 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc);
static inline void percpu_counter_add(struct percpu_counter *fbc, s64 amount)
{
- __percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, FBC_BATCH);
+ __percpu_counter_add(fbc, amount, percpu_counter_batch);
}
static inline s64 percpu_counter_sum_positive(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
diff --git a/lib/percpu_counter.c b/lib/percpu_counter.c
index a866389..519b877 100644
--- a/lib/percpu_counter.c
+++ b/lib/percpu_counter.c
@@ -114,6 +114,16 @@ void percpu_counter_destroy(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_destroy);
+int percpu_counter_batch __read_mostly = 32;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(percpu_counter_batch);
+
+static void compute_batch_value(void)
+{
+ int nr = num_online_cpus();
+
+ percpu_counter_batch = max(32, nr*2);
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
@@ -121,6 +131,7 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
unsigned int cpu;
struct percpu_counter *fbc;
+ compute_batch_value();
if (action != CPU_DEAD)
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -139,11 +150,14 @@ static int __cpuinit percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
mutex_unlock(&percpu_counters_lock);
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
+#else
+#define percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback NULL
+#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
static int __init percpu_counter_startup(void)
{
+ compute_batch_value();
hotcpu_notifier(percpu_counter_hotcpu_callback, 0);
return 0;
}
module_init(percpu_counter_startup);
-#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-07 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-05 16:05 [PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH might be too big Eric Dumazet
2008-12-05 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05 20:32 ` David Miller
2008-12-07 9:25 ` [PATCH, take2] " Eric Dumazet
2008-12-07 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-07 18:30 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-12-07 18:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-08 4:32 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-08 8:05 ` [PATCH] percpu_counter: FBC_BATCH should be a variable Eric Dumazet
2008-12-08 8:05 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-12-08 8:19 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=493C1632.2000901@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.