Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support

[Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3618 bytes --]

Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 17:05 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>  
>>> Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>>>    
>>>> On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 13:53 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> This is v2 as version one had a type in it occured when splitting
>>>>> patches.
>>>>> Mercurial somehow lost my changes to the patch description
>>>>> explaining that, but the patch is right this way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>>>>>        
>>>>>> # HG changeset patch
>>>>>> # User Christian Ehrhardt
>>>>>> <ehrhardt-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>> # Date 1228999833 -3600
>>>>>> # Node ID dc1466c9077ab162f4637fffee1869f26be02299
>>>>>> # Parent  4c07fe2a56c7653a9113e05bb08c2de9aec210ce
>>>>>> [PATCH] qemu: ppc: kvm-userspace: KVM PowerPC support for qemu
>>>>>> gdbstub
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Hollis Blanchard
>>>>>> <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add basic KVM PowerPC support to qemu's gdbstub introducing a kvm
>>>>>> ppc style
>>>>>> mmu implementation that uses the kvm_translate ioctl.
>>>>>> This also requires to save the kvm registers prior to the 'm' gdb
>>>>>> operations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard
>>>>>> <hollisb-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt
>>>>>> <ehrhardt-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
>>>>>>           
>>>> Let's *not* apply this to kvm-userspace. We will submit this to qemu,
>>>> and once we work out the right solution there it will be merged
>>>> naturally.
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> I don't oversee yet what you want to push upstream, but in case it's the
>>> gdbstub support for kvm (including ppc bits): please note that I plan to
>>> push the new interface once it is merged into kvm-userspace, avoiding to
>>> spread the current, limited one as far as possible.
>>>
>>> BTW, would be great if you could have a look / provide patches for ppc
>>> to support the new interface already. I am open for feedback,
>>> specifically regarding its suitability beyond x86.
>>>     
>>
>> I've been meaning to do this for a while, sorry. We'll take a look soon.
>>
>>   
> Hi Jan,
> I saw that you already had that env->s->g_cpu fix, so if you change all
> that
> anyway it might really be better to test/extend your patches for powerpc
> now.
> 
> If it is ok for you I would submit my patches that apply on top of yours to
> you and cc the kvm list. But as Hollis mentioned I would prefer go for qemu
> upstream first and then assist Avi in merging it into kvm-userspace because
> this is the natural direction patches flow atm (and if you need to
> change it
> multiple times until you get qemu acceptance you would have to extensivly
> patch both projects to match again).

My current roadmap is first merging kernel bits and corresponding
kvm-userspace changes so that we can test both extensively in the
context of full-blown kvm, and then push an adopted userspace interface
into qemu. The other way around would create the risk of missing
problems that only pop up under full-featured kvm (upstream is still
fairly limited, specifically as there is no threaded smp support).

That said, if you have (ppc-)changes that can be pushed immediately and
independently, there is surely no need to wait for the kvm-gdb series.

> 
> As my code in that case depend on your patches it would be nice if you
> could
> put them into your series once you are happy with it.
> 

I will happily carry them, no problem.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]