From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Support S3 for MSI interrupt in latest kernel dom0
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 15:19:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49492679.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C56EC609.20544%keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com> 17.12.08 16:06 >>>
>On 17/12/2008 14:47, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> wrote:
>
>>> Could Xen remember the MSI state automatically, as it does for IO-APIC
>>> presumably already? It knows what vectors are routed where at least, even if
>>> dom0 has to reprogram the PCI device itself.
>>
>> That is what the map_guest_pirq() re-invocation is intended for - use the
>> already known (stored) MSI state to re-setup the device accordingly
>> (after all, msi_compose_msg() only depends on the vector information
>> to be able to reconstruct address and data fields).
>
>Why wait for map_guest_pirq() to be invoked to do this?
Otherwise we need a new hypercall here, since Xen cannot do this
completely on its own (it has to wait for Dom0 to bring the device out of
any suspend state it may itself be in). And it would allow restoring the
old mechanism in your (2.6.18) Dom0, just without the unmap-pirq
portion during suspend - instead of needing another full re-
implementation cycle.
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-17 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-17 12:11 [PATCH][RFC] Support S3 for MSI interrupt in latest kernel dom0 Jiang, Yunhong
2008-12-17 12:27 ` Keir Fraser
2008-12-17 14:47 ` Jan Beulich
2008-12-17 15:06 ` Keir Fraser
2008-12-17 15:19 ` Jan Beulich [this message]
2008-12-17 15:22 ` Keir Fraser
2008-12-17 15:31 ` Jan Beulich
2008-12-17 15:53 ` Keir Fraser
2008-12-18 2:24 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2008-12-18 7:33 ` Jan Beulich
2008-12-19 10:10 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2008-12-19 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2008-12-19 10:39 ` Jiang, Yunhong
2008-12-19 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49492679.76E4.0078.0@novell.com \
--to=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
--cc=yunhong.jiang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.