All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
To: Greg KH <greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia-dAYI7NvHqcQ@public.gmane.org>,
	khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from	platform_driver
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:30:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217213226.GA26832-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>> Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>>
>>>> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus of
>>>> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus
>>>> unnecessary.  This patch removes the return value for the remove function
>>>> stored in a platform_driver structure.
>>>>
>>>> For the files drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c and
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c, the original return value was the value
>>>> of a variable storing the result of calling i2c_del_adapter.  I have thus
>>>> also deleted the declaration and initialization of this variable.  For the
>>>> other files, the return values were always 0.
>>>>
>>>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
>>>> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>> I take it remove_new will eventually be renamed to remove once all
>>> the changes have been made?
>>>
>>> Unless there are any objections I'll add this to the merge list for
>>> the next window.
>> Please be careful since the drivers/base/ part has not been applied
>> yet, so I'm Cc:ing Greg now for his opinion.
> 
> The more I think about it, the more I think it should not be changed,
> sorry.  We should leave the return value and do something based on the
> value of it if we can.

Thanks for the reply, it's justifying the changes in the SGI SCSI controller driver :)

Dmitri

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
To: Greg KH <greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia-dAYI7NvHqcQ@public.gmane.org>,
	khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from	platform_driver remove functions
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217213226.GA26832-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>> Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia-dAYI7NvHqcQ@public.gmane.org>
>>>>
>>>> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus of
>>>> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus
>>>> unnecessary.  This patch removes the return value for the remove function
>>>> stored in a platform_driver structure.
>>>>
>>>> For the files drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c and
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c, the original return value was the value
>>>> of a variable storing the result of calling i2c_del_adapter.  I have thus
>>>> also deleted the declaration and initialization of this variable.  For the
>>>> other files, the return values were always 0.
>>>>
>>>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
>>>> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>> I take it remove_new will eventually be renamed to remove once all
>>> the changes have been made?
>>>
>>> Unless there are any objections I'll add this to the merge list for
>>> the next window.
>> Please be careful since the drivers/base/ part has not been applied
>> yet, so I'm Cc:ing Greg now for his opinion.
> 
> The more I think about it, the more I think it should not be changed,
> sorry.  We should leave the return value and do something based on the
> value of it if we can.

Thanks for the reply, it's justifying the changes in the SGI SCSI controller driver :)

Dmitri

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>,
	khali@linux-fr.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from	platform_driver remove functions
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081217213226.GA26832@kroah.com>

Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:49:46PM +0200, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
>> Ben Dooks wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 05:27:56PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>>> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>>>>
>>>> The return value of the remove function of a driver structure, and thus of
>>>> a platform_driver structure, is ultimately ignored, and is thus
>>>> unnecessary.  This patch removes the return value for the remove function
>>>> stored in a platform_driver structure.
>>>>
>>>> For the files drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c and
>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c, the original return value was the value
>>>> of a variable storing the result of calling i2c_del_adapter.  I have thus
>>>> also deleted the declaration and initialization of this variable.  For the
>>>> other files, the return values were always 0.
>>>>
>>>> A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as
>>>> follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>>> I take it remove_new will eventually be renamed to remove once all
>>> the changes have been made?
>>>
>>> Unless there are any objections I'll add this to the merge list for
>>> the next window.
>> Please be careful since the drivers/base/ part has not been applied
>> yet, so I'm Cc:ing Greg now for his opinion.
> 
> The more I think about it, the more I think it should not be changed,
> sorry.  We should leave the return value and do something based on the
> value of it if we can.

Thanks for the reply, it's justifying the changes in the SGI SCSI controller driver :)

Dmitri

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-18 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-10 16:27 [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver Julia Lawall
2008-12-10 16:27 ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Julia Lawall
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0812101727230.21998-QfmoRoYWmW9knbxzx/v8hQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-16 19:57   ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from Ben Dooks
2008-12-16 19:57     ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Ben Dooks
2008-12-16 19:57     ` Ben Dooks
     [not found]     ` <20081216195734.GA8032-elnMNo+KYs3pIgCt6eIbzw@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-17 12:49       ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-17 12:49         ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-17 12:49         ` Dmitri Vorobiev
     [not found]         ` <4948F56A.7020501-WgUW+8SLYMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-17 21:32           ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from Greg KH
2008-12-17 21:32             ` [PATCH 4/28] drivers/ide: Drop return value from platform_driver remove functions Greg KH
2008-12-17 21:32             ` Greg KH
     [not found]             ` <20081217213226.GA26832-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-18 14:30               ` Dmitri Vorobiev [this message]
2008-12-18 14:30                 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
2008-12-18 14:30                 ` Dmitri Vorobiev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=494A5E6F.70505@movial.fi \
    --to=dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi \
    --cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=greg-U8xfFu+wG4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=julia-dAYI7NvHqcQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.