From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.orglinux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.10: ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:30:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495A5A9F.9020406@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812300657050.11356@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On one system, two Raptor 150s:
>
> [ 0.739402] ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768
> [ 0.739491] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 0.739577] ata1.00: 293044655 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 0.742454] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> [ 1.059146] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> [ 1.061406] ata2.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 1.061494] ata2.00: 293046768 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 1.064360] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> Two disks in a RAID-1 (mdadm) configuration, how come the first one
> has an issue w/HPA as the firmware of both disks is the same..?
>
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,038,863,360 bytes
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,039,945,216 bytes
> l1:~#
>
> Why does this occur?
Presumably somebody or something set up a host protected area on one
drive and not the other.. I believe there are some utilities out there
that can be used to disable the HPA and allow the full capacity to be used.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.10: ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:30:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <495A5A9F.9020406@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0812300657050.11356@p34.internal.lan>
Justin Piszcz wrote:
> On one system, two Raptor 150s:
>
> [ 0.739402] ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768
> [ 0.739491] ata1.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 0.739577] ata1.00: 293044655 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 0.742454] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> [ 1.059146] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
> [ 1.061406] ata2.00: ATA-7: WDC WD1500ADFD-00NLR5, 21.07QR5, max
> UDMA/133
> [ 1.061494] ata2.00: 293046768 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
> [ 1.064360] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
>
> Two disks in a RAID-1 (mdadm) configuration, how come the first one
> has an issue w/HPA as the firmware of both disks is the same..?
>
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sda | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,038,863,360 bytes
> l1:~# smartctl -a /dev/sdb | grep -i bytes
> User Capacity: 150,039,945,216 bytes
> l1:~#
>
> Why does this occur?
Presumably somebody or something set up a host protected area on one
drive and not the other.. I believe there are some utilities out there
that can be used to disable the HPA and allow the full capacity to be used.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-30 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-30 12:26 2.6.27.10: ata1.00: HPA detected: current 293044655, native 293046768 Justin Piszcz
2008-12-30 15:41 ` Michal Soltys
2008-12-30 17:30 ` Robert Hancock [this message]
2008-12-30 17:30 ` Robert Hancock
2008-12-30 18:12 ` David Lethe
2008-12-30 18:12 ` David Lethe
2008-12-31 16:33 ` Mark Lord
2008-12-31 16:33 ` Mark Lord
2009-01-03 13:15 ` Justin Piszcz
2008-12-30 18:51 ` Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=495A5A9F.9020406@shaw.ca \
--to=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.orglinux-kernel \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.