Re: class kernel_service not defined in policy

["Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@gmail.com>]

Eric Paris wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 1:13 PM, David P. Quigley <dpquigl@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
>
>   
>> So commit bb26c6c29b7cc9f39e491b074b09f3c284738d36 is a merger of James'
>> security tree into Linus's main tree. On of the patch sets in there is
>> the new credentials work from David Howells. One of those patches adds a
>> kernel service object class to selinux so policy can be written to all
>> that service to be granted the ability to override certain permission
>> checks. I just built a policy from refpolicy and the policy.conf doesn't
>> have a kernel_service object class. I'm not sure if the policy engine
>> uses the kernel headers, the dynamic object class discovery mechanism,
>> or a built in list to generate the boilerplate with all the object
>> classes and permissions. Regardless it is mainly so things like cachefs
>> and NFSD can be granted the ability to act as other entities when
>> making/fulfilling requests. I don't think there is a need to be
>> concerned about it yet unless something is no longer working for you.
>>     
>
> It shouldn't be of concern to you.  But refpolicy needs to add at
> least the class (if not the perms) so it doesn't get assigned to
> anything else...
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bfdc75ae077d60a01572a7781ec6264d55ab1b9
>
> Looks like it is class number 74 (and if it's already used in policy
> we need to fix one or the other quickly....)
>
>   
No worries man!!

regards;

Justin P. Mattock

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.