[linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Mike Martin]

Hi - hope this is the right list to ask questions about dvbstream.

I am using dvbstream for an application I am developing
(www.sourceforge.net/epgrec) and when I try using the -n switch
(according to help should set number of seconds to record) it has no
effect

I have tried all place on command line and no errors just no effect

example
dvbstream -ps  640 641 -n 1800 -o >
/media/video2/BBC_NewsREC_2009_01_01_18_31_45.mpeg

Am I missing something?

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Nico Sabbi]

Il giorno gio, 01/01/2009 alle 18.33 +0000, Mike Martin ha scritto:
> Hi - hope this is the right list to ask questions about dvbstream.
> 
> I am using dvbstream for an application I am developing
> (www.sourceforge.net/epgrec) and when I try using the -n switch
> (according to help should set number of seconds to record) it has no
> effect
> 
> I have tried all place on command line and no errors just no effect
> 
> example
> dvbstream -ps  640 641 -n 1800 -o >
> /media/video2/BBC_NewsREC_2009_01_01_18_31_45.mpeg

no tuning?? Also, -ps is very dangerous. It's better to save the TS

> 
> Am I missing something?
> 

use a fresh checkout, not the 0.5 release.


_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Mike Martin]

On 02/01/2009, Nico Sabbi <nicola.sabbi@poste.it> wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 01.26 +0000, Mike Martin ha scritto:
>
>> Done a fresh checkout and now I cant stream anything other than the
>> whole stream (ie pid 8192)
>>
>> If I try
>> -ps
>>
>> I get
>> ../dvbstream/dvbstream -ps 5377 7078   -o > /media/video2/tvb.mpeg
>> dvbstream v0.7 - (C) Dave Chapman 2001-2004
>> Released under the GPL.
>> Latest version available from http://www.linuxstb.org/
>> ERROR: PS requires exactly two PIDS - video and audio.
>>
>> as opposed to
>>
>
>
>
>
>> ./dvbstream -ps 5377 7078   -o > /media/video2/tvb.mpeg
>> dvbstream v0.5 - (C) Dave Chapman 2001-2004
>> Released under the GPL.
>> Latest version available from http://www.linuxstb.org/
>> Setting filter for PID 5377
>> Setting filter for PID 7078
>> Output to stdout
>> Streaming 2 streams
>> Audiostream: Layer: 2  BRate: 128 kb/s  Freq: 48.0 kHz
>> Videostream: ASPECT: 4:3  Size = 544x576  FRate: 25 fps  BRate: 15.00
>> Mbit/s
>>
>
> fixed in cvs
>

I thought that I had got latest cvs. Could you confirm where cvs is
hosted, I assumed from sourceforge and did a checkout last night

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Nico Sabbi]

Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 16.55 +0000, Mike Martin ha scritto:
> On 02/01/2009, Nico Sabbi <nicola.sabbi@poste.it> wrote:

> >
> > fixed in cvs
> >
> 
> I thought that I had got latest cvs. Could you confirm where cvs is
> hosted, I assumed from sourceforge and did a checkout last night
> 

the cvs is in the sourceforge repository; I committed the fix this
morning 



_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Mike Martin]

On 02/01/2009, Nico Sabbi <nicola.sabbi@poste.it> wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 16.55 +0000, Mike Martin ha scritto:
>> On 02/01/2009, Nico Sabbi <nicola.sabbi@poste.it> wrote:
>
>> >
>> > fixed in cvs
>> >
>>
>> I thought that I had got latest cvs. Could you confirm where cvs is
>> hosted, I assumed from sourceforge and did a checkout last night
>>
>
> the cvs is in the sourceforge repository; I committed the fix this
> morning


thanks - try it later

BTW - this message at the prompt

Latest version available from http://www.linuxstb.org/

may need to be changed - site doesnt seem to be much to do with dvbstream

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[BOUWSMA Barry]

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Mike Martin wrote:

> I am using dvbstream for an application I am developing
> (www.sourceforge.net/epgrec) and when I try using the -n switch
> (according to help should set number of seconds to record) it has no
> effect

Do you have the source for your version (I presume you
mean v0.5) ?

This is the patch I have applied to v0.6, among lots of
others, which I think will fix it for you, assuming the
code is comparable between versions...

--- /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c-DIST	2005-01-06 11:25:27.000000000 +0100
+++ /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c	2005-12-05 14:55:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -846,7 +849,7 @@
   if(map_cnt > 0)
     fprintf(stderr, "\n");
   for (i=0;i<map_cnt;i++) {
-    if ((secs==-1) || (secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
+    if ((secs==-1) || ((long)secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
     if(pids_map[i].filename != NULL)
     	fprintf(stderr,"MAP %d, file %s: From %ld secs, To %ld secs, %d PIDs - ",i,pids_map[i].filename,pids_map[i].start_time,pids_map[i].end_time,pids_map[i].pid_cnt);
     else


There are a lot of other hacks in the version I'm running;
either I'll post them as-is against the 2005 source code,
or I'll try to create diffs where applicable against the
lastest source, or I won't bother -- depends how lazy I
am -- maybe I'll just post a description of hacks I've
added in case there's interest...


thanks
barry bouwsma

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Nico Sabbi]

Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 11.00 +0100, BOUWSMA Barry ha scritto:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Mike Martin wrote:
> 
> > I am using dvbstream for an application I am developing
> > (www.sourceforge.net/epgrec) and when I try using the -n switch
> > (according to help should set number of seconds to record) it has no
> > effect
> 
> Do you have the source for your version (I presume you
> mean v0.5) ?
> 
> This is the patch I have applied to v0.6, among lots of
> others, which I think will fix it for you, assuming the
> code is comparable between versions...
> 
> --- /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c-DIST	2005-01-06 11:25:27.000000000 +0100
> +++ /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c	2005-12-05 14:55:50.000000000 +0100
> @@ -846,7 +849,7 @@
>    if(map_cnt > 0)
>      fprintf(stderr, "\n");
>    for (i=0;i<map_cnt;i++) {
> -    if ((secs==-1) || (secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
> +    if ((secs==-1) || ((long)secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
>      if(pids_map[i].filename != NULL)
>      	fprintf(stderr,"MAP %d, file %s: From %ld secs, To %ld secs, %d PIDs - ",i,pids_map[i].filename,pids_map[i].start_time,pids_map[i].end_time,pids_map[i].pid_cnt);
>      else
> 
> 
> There are a lot of other hacks in the version I'm running;
> either I'll post them as-is against the 2005 source code,
> or I'll try to create diffs where applicable against the
> lastest source, or I won't bother -- depends how lazy I
> am -- maybe I'll just post a description of hacks I've
> added in case there's interest...
> 
> 
> thanks
> barry bouwsma
> 

can you post a patch against latest cvs, please?



_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Nico Sabbi]

Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 11.20 +0100, Nico Sabbi ha scritto:
> Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 11.00 +0100, BOUWSMA Barry ha scritto:
> > 
> > --- /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c-DIST	2005-01-06 11:25:27.000000000 +0100
> > +++ /mnt/usr/local/src/dvbtools/dvbstream/dvbstream.c	2005-12-05 14:55:50.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -846,7 +849,7 @@
> >    if(map_cnt > 0)
> >      fprintf(stderr, "\n");
> >    for (i=0;i<map_cnt;i++) {
> > -    if ((secs==-1) || (secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
> > +    if ((secs==-1) || ((long)secs < pids_map[i].end_time)) { secs=pids_map[i].end_time; }
> >      if(pids_map[i].filename != NULL)
> >      	fprintf(stderr,"MAP %d, file %s: From %ld secs, To %ld secs, %d PIDs - ",i,pids_map[i].filename,pids_map[i].start_time,pids_map[i].end_time,pids_map[i].pid_cnt);
> >      else
> > 
> > 
> > There are a lot of other hacks in the version I'm running;
> > either I'll post them as-is against the 2005 source code,
> > or I'll try to create diffs where applicable against the
> > lastest source, or I won't bother -- depends how lazy I
> > am -- maybe I'll just post a description of hacks I've
> > added in case there's interest...
> > 
> > 
> > thanks
> > barry bouwsma
> > 
> 
> can you post a patch against latest cvs, please?
> 

I forgot to add that the -ps bug is fixed in cvs.

BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
*fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than
to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
Majesty the ML administrator.
Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least
explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken?
Please, no speculations: just facts.

Thanks,
	Nico


_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[BOUWSMA Barry]

On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Nico Sabbi wrote:

> > can you post a patch against latest cvs, please?

It will be some time, as I will need to figure which bugfixes
are already there, and whether custom added features are
already included, or will apply painlessly...  Plus, Real
Life has the habit of rearing its ugly head too often and
taking my time from better things.

For starters, so I don't waste my time, I've hacked the
code from 2005 to...
* permit extending the recording by SIGHUP (in case the
  supplied value is incorrect, the program overruns or
  starts late, or something)
* allow the user to specify that the program terminates
  immediately in case of problems such as inability to
  open the specified output file
* for writing to a specified file, directs normal messages
  to stdout and errors to stderr -- allows me to call the
  program >/dev/null from a script from `cron' and only
  receive mail in case of errors that I could correct
* what seem to be a few compiler quietings
* RTP MPA audio hacks that may not work
* probably checks that nothing else has the device open
  to prevent interfering with anything else
* other fixes that certainly aren't needed now (dev/ost)

In case any of the above are undesired by anyone save
myself, I won't bother creating those particular diffs



> BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
> *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than
> to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
> Majesty the ML administrator.

That's the wrong header.  See my headers.  Reply-To: should
be a user-supplied header, as I've often used when sending
mail from one account but receiving it elsewhere.

A better header to use would be Mail-Followup-To: or
Mail-Reply-To: , so that, should I start using a dyndns
domain again, I can still receive personal replies.

Anyway, I default to replying to all recipients, and trim
the list if I think personal mail would be better, or the
individual recipient(s) if it's not directed at them, the
Reply-To: if I don't want to use that redirection...  But
my mailer is clear about this, and handles the different
reply-type headers properly, yet allowing me flexibility
to take things off-list as appropriate

bazza bouwzma

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Anssi Hannula]

Nico Sabbi wrote:
> BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
> *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than
> to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
> Majesty the ML administrator.
> Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least
> explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken?
> Please, no speculations: just facts.

This is the standard practice on kernel development lists.

See e.g. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-- 
Anssi Hannula

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Nico Sabbi]

Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 22.03 +0200, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
> Nico Sabbi wrote:
> > BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
> > *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather than
> > to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
> > Majesty the ML administrator.
> > Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least
> > explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken?
> > Please, no speculations: just facts.
> 
> This is the standard practice on kernel development lists.
> 
> See e.g. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> 

yes, that link was sent to me other times; I disagree
completely with all that it says, especially because
if you are sending messages to a list it's perfectly reasonable
to expect the replies to belong to the list, at least by default.
Replies may be addressed to the original poster, but that is
surely the exception, not the norm.




_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

Re: [linux-dvb] dvbsream v0-5 and -n switch

[Darren Salt]

I demand that Nico Sabbi may or may not have written...

> Il giorno ven, 02/01/2009 alle 22.03 +0200, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
>> Nico Sabbi wrote:
>>> BTW, for years I asked to insert the correct "reply-to" header in this
>>> *fuckingly broken* mailing list (to send replies to the list rather
>>> than to the poster), but not a single time I received an answer by His
>>> Majesty the ML administrator.
>>> Can someone fix this issue, please? If not, can the admin at least
>>> explain *why* he/she wants to keep it broken? Please, no speculations:
>>> just facts.
>> This is the standard practice on kernel development lists.
>> See e.g. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

> yes, that link was sent to me other times; I disagree completely with all
> that it says, especially because if you are sending messages to a list it's
> perfectly reasonable to expect the replies to belong to the list, at least
> by default. Replies may be addressed to the original poster, but that is
> surely the exception, not the norm.

How I see it: follow up to the list, reply to the poster. But then I, and the
software which I normally use (and older software which I've used), treat
them as something like "newsgroups via email".

More widespread usage of Mail-{Followup,Reply}-To would be good.

-- 
| Darren Salt    | linux or ds at              | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Buy less and make it last longer.         INDUSTRY CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING.

A visit to a fresh place will bring strange work.

_______________________________________________
linux-dvb mailing list
linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb