From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: aluno <aluno3@poczta.onet.pl>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_db problem
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:43:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964BF7E.6060906@sandeen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4964BD79.20806@poczta.onet.pl>
aluno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently we've noticed that xfs_admin (xfs_db ver. 2.10.2) causes
> segfault or FP traps while trying
> to use following command on FAT partition:
>
> # xfs_admin -u /dev/sda1
> xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb58906d
> Floating point exception
>
> and then makes error in dmesg:
>
> xfs_db[10385] trap divide error ip:80b32b0 sp:fffbd900 error:0 in
> xfs_db[8048000+7f000]
>
> We know that xfs_admin is dedicated tool for XFS only not for FAT or
> other filesystems,
> but we would like to have xfs_db which will be able to cope with non-xfs
> filesystems also.
>
> After some investigations we've found some place and put there exit(1) -
> in xfsprogs-2.10.2/db/init.c
>
> in init() procedure:
>
> (...)
> sbp = &xmount.m_sb;
> if (sbp->sb_magicnum != XFS_SB_MAGIC) {
> fprintf(stderr, _("%s: unexpected XFS SB magic number
> 0x%08x\n"),
> progname, sbp->sb_magicnum);
> exit(1);
> }
> (...)
>
>
>
> Is it the right way to fix this problem?
The thing is, xfs_db could in theory be used to *fix* the bad magic
number, so refusing to continue might be a problem. But perhaps when
invoked as xfs_admin, it should just bail out. It would be interesting
to find where the actual failure is, though...
FWIW, I see a slightly different failure on a 128M vfat fs:
[root@host tmp]# file fsfile
fsfile: x86 boot sector, mkdosfs boot message display
[root@host tmp]# xfs_admin -u fsfile
xfs_admin: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0xeb3c906d
xfs_admin: size check failed
xfs_admin: failed to alloc 20875030464 bytes: Cannot allocate memory
It probably depends on the details of the (non-xfs) filesystem it's
pointed at.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-07 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-07 14:34 xfs_db problem aluno
2009-01-07 14:43 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2009-01-07 17:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-07 14:37 aluno3
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4964BF7E.6060906@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=aluno3@poczta.onet.pl \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.