From: Casey Dahlin <cdahlin@redhat.com>
To: Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:25:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4969204A.3090606@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231607252.11642.103.camel@quest>
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> That's pretty neat, much nicer than what we had before. So what about
> waitfd() [I think I've slightly changed Casey's API here, or he changed
> my proposed one <g>]?
>
I think you might have changed the argument order slighly, but other
than that, counting the corrections I've made from feedback here, its
about the same.
--CJD
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-10 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-06 18:11 [RFC PATCH v2] waitfd Casey Dahlin
2009-01-06 18:27 ` Alan Cox
2009-01-06 18:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-06 18:45 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-06 18:50 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-01-06 18:48 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-06 19:07 ` [RESEND][RFC " Casey Dahlin
2009-01-07 12:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 13:05 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-07 15:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 17:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-07 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 17:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-01-07 20:38 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-10 14:47 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 21:14 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-10 21:20 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 22:08 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-10 22:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 22:37 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-10 22:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-07 20:53 ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-07 20:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 21:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-01-07 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-07 21:02 ` Ulrich Drepper
2009-01-08 14:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-08 19:35 ` Roland McGrath
2009-01-08 20:36 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-08 21:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 14:52 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 16:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 17:09 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 18:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 18:46 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 14:50 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 21:20 ` Casey Dahlin
2009-01-08 22:04 ` Michael Kerrisk
2009-01-10 14:09 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 14:45 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 17:07 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 18:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 20:13 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-01-10 22:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-10 23:14 ` Davide Libenzi
2009-01-10 22:25 ` Casey Dahlin [this message]
2009-01-10 23:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2011-03-02 1:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2011-03-02 13:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4969204A.3090606@redhat.com \
--to=cdahlin@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=scott@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.