From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: matthltc@us.ibm.com, Matt Cross <matt.cross@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28? (Was: Re: ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28?)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:54:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496AF724.8060203@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.0901120835390.21692@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-12-31 at 17:00 -0500, Matt Cross wrote:
>>>> I think the work to move ebtables to use xtables broke ebtables.
>>>> Specifically, in commit 8cc784eec6676b58e7f60419c88179aaa97bf71c the
>>>> return value of the match functions was inverted so that they return 1
>>>> (true) on matches instead of EBT_MATCH (0), and vice versa (look in
>>>> ebt_ip.c). The logic in ebtables.c (ebt_do_table() and
>>>> EBT_MATCH_ITERATE()) expect match functions to return 0 for matches.
>>>>
>> Jan, could you have a look at this please?
>
> That seemds indeed so.
> Patch is both for 2.6.29-running and 2.6.28.
>
> netfilter: ebtables: fix inversion in match code
Applied, thanks. When fixing regressions please state the commit
ID and subject of the patch introducing the breakage and also who
reported it.
Like this.
[-- Attachment #2: 01.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1032 bytes --]
commit c6b52c688ecf03adb82724299b97701528821ca5
Author: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Date: Mon Jan 12 08:52:08 2009 +0100
netfilter: ebtables: fix inversion in match code
Commit 8cc784ee (netfilter: change return types of match functions
for ebtables extensions) broke ebtables matches by inverting the
sense of match/nomatch.
Reported-by: Matt Cross <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
index 8a8743d..820252a 100644
--- a/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
+++ b/net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ static inline int ebt_do_match (struct ebt_entry_match *m,
{
par->match = m->u.match;
par->matchinfo = m->data;
- return m->u.match->match(skb, par);
+ return m->u.match->match(skb, par) ? EBT_MATCH : EBT_NOMATCH;
}
static inline int ebt_dev_check(char *entry, const struct net_device *device)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-12 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-31 22:00 ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28? Matt Cross
2009-01-01 3:16 ` [PATCH] ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28? (Was: Re: ebtables match inverted in 2.6.28?) Matthew Helsley
2009-01-12 5:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-12 7:43 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-01-12 7:54 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-01-13 21:20 ` Matt Helsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496AF724.8060203@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt.cross@gmail.com \
--cc=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.