All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.28 stable] m68knommu: fix m68knommu defconfig can't build
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:06:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496B4073.4040108@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090112104447.GG28564@linux-sh.org>

Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:20:06PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi Kosako,
>>
>> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> I guess nobody don't test m68knommu at all last three month.
>>> Do we still need to maintain this architecture?
>> Yes, we do.
>>
> Any effort to get m68knommu folded in to m68k proper? This might help

Some :-)
The header merge is the first step.


> with some of your bitrot issues.. And likely less work to do in
> supporting those m68knommu parts that ship with MMUs ;-)
> 
> m68knommu is the only one of the mmu/nommu variants left that ships in
> its own architecture directory rather than being folded in to its parent.
> It would be good to get rid of it one of these days.

Yep. I think we will likely make some progress on this over
the next few months...



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear, a McAfee Company                  PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for 2.6.28 stable] m68knommu: fix m68knommu defconfig can't build
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:06:59 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496B4073.4040108@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090112104447.GG28564@linux-sh.org>

Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:20:06PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi Kosako,
>>
>> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> I guess nobody don't test m68knommu at all last three month.
>>> Do we still need to maintain this architecture?
>> Yes, we do.
>>
> Any effort to get m68knommu folded in to m68k proper? This might help

Some :-)
The header merge is the first step.


> with some of your bitrot issues.. And likely less work to do in
> supporting those m68knommu parts that ship with MMUs ;-)
> 
> m68knommu is the only one of the mmu/nommu variants left that ships in
> its own architecture directory rather than being folded in to its parent.
> It would be good to get rid of it one of these days.

Yep. I think we will likely make some progress on this over
the next few months...



-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear, a McAfee Company                  PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St,                             FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia         WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-12 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-30 10:44 [PATCH for 2.6.28 stable] m68knommu: fix m68knommu defconfig can't build KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-12-30 10:44 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-10-06  6:20 ` Greg Ungerer
2008-10-06  6:20   ` Greg Ungerer
2009-01-12 10:35   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-12 10:35     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-01-12 10:44   ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 10:44     ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 10:59     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-12 10:59     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-12 11:07       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 11:07         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-12 11:12       ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 11:12         ` Paul Mundt
2009-01-12 13:06     ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2009-01-12 13:06       ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=496B4073.4040108@snapgear.com \
    --to=gerg@snapgear.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.