All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc32 compile error: redefini
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:38:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496D5E19.7040802@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113184536.95ebc973.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:39 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:04 -0500
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Todays git produces this compile error on sparc32:
>>>>
>>>> kernel/up.c:10: error: redefinition of ___smp_call_function_single___
>>>> /usr/src/sparc32/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:78: error: previous definition of ___smp_call_function_single___ was here
>>>>         
>>> Andrew, are you sure that Makefile condition for compiling
>>> up.o is correct?
>>>       
>> you give me grounds for now being ;)
>>
>>     
>>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>>> obj-y += smp.o
>>> else
>>> obj-y += up.o
>>> endif
>>>
>>> If an arch doesn't use generic SMP helpers, there is no way
>>> we should compile up.c into the tree when SMP.
>>>
>>>       
>> How's about this?
>>
>> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
>> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
>>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>>  obj-y += smp.o
>>  else
>> -obj-y += up.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += up.o
>>  endif
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
>>     
>
> err, the other way of course...
>
> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>  obj-y += smp.o
>  else
> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
>  obj-y += up.o
>  endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
> _
>
>
>
>   
This worked:

diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 2aebc4c..368227d 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
 obj-y += smp.o
 else
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
 obj-y += up.o
 endif
+endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"sparclinux@vger.kernel.org" <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:38:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <496D5E19.7040802@earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090113184536.95ebc973.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:42:39 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:10:39 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> From: Robert Reif <reif@earthlink.net>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:40:04 -0500
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Todays git produces this compile error on sparc32:
>>>>
>>>> kernel/up.c:10: error: redefinition of ___smp_call_function_single___
>>>> /usr/src/sparc32/linux-2.6/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:78: error: previous definition of ___smp_call_function_single___ was here
>>>>         
>>> Andrew, are you sure that Makefile condition for compiling
>>> up.o is correct?
>>>       
>> you give me grounds for now being ;)
>>
>>     
>>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>>> obj-y += smp.o
>>> else
>>> obj-y += up.o
>>> endif
>>>
>>> If an arch doesn't use generic SMP helpers, there is no way
>>> we should compile up.c into the tree when SMP.
>>>
>>>       
>> How's about this?
>>
>> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
>> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
>>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>>  obj-y += smp.o
>>  else
>> -obj-y += up.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += up.o
>>  endif
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
>>     
>
> err, the other way of course...
>
> --- a/kernel/Makefile~a
> +++ a/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
>  ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
>  obj-y += smp.o
>  else
> +ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
>  obj-y += up.o
>  endif
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
> _
>
>
>
>   
This worked:

diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
index 2aebc4c..368227d 100644
--- a/kernel/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/Makefile
@@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS),y)
 obj-y += smp.o
 else
+ifneq ($(CONFIG_SMP),y)
 obj-y += up.o
 endif
+endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-14  3:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <496D4274.6000304@earthlink.net>
2009-01-14  2:10 ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ David Miller
2009-01-14  2:42   ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14  2:45     ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-14  3:38       ` Robert Reif [this message]
2009-01-14  3:38         ` Robert Reif
2009-01-14  7:59         ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp Andrew Morton
2009-01-14  7:59           ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 15:32           ` sparc32 compile error: redef Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-14 15:32             ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-14 18:25             ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 18:25               ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ Andrew Morton
2009-01-14 20:08               ` sparc32 compile error: redef Sam Ravnborg
2009-01-14 20:08                 ` sparc32 compile error: redefinition of ‘smp_call_function_single’ Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=496D5E19.7040802@earthlink.net \
    --to=reif@earthlink.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.