From: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] ath9k: add preliminary support for the AR913x SoCs
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:15:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496E39C2.8040208@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231882731.21706.10.camel@dv>
Pavel Roskin ?rta:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:40 +0100, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> This patch set introduces preliminary support for the Atheros' AR9130/AR9132
>> SoCs built-in WMAC device. Tested with compat-wireless-2009-01-12 and 2.6.27.10
>> kernel on the following devices:
>> * Atheros AP83-050 reference board (AR9132 SoC, AR9106 RF)
>> * TRENDnet TEW-632BRP router (AR9130 SoC, AR9102 RF)
>> * Mikrotik RB433 board (AR7161 SoC) + AR5416 based miniPCI card
>
> I confirm that my AR5416 miniPCI is still working with this patch on top
> of yesterdays wireless-testing (master-2009-01-12).
>
> Unfortunately, patch named "ath9k: move PCI code into separate file"
> doesn't apply to the today's wireless-testing and needs to be rebased.
Yes. I will post a new set.
>
> Current checkpatch.pl gets confused by several patches because an
> "#endif" in the unchanged part somehow causes the preprocessor stack to
> underflow:
>
> Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
> scripts/checkpatch.pl line 453.
>
> This appears to be a bug in checkpatch.pl and should not be considered a
> problem in the patches.
>
I have noticed it, but i'm not a Perl expert, so I have checked the patches
with checkpatch.pl from 2.6.28.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
To: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
Jouni Malinen <jmalinen@atheros.com>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Sujith Manoharan <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] ath9k: add preliminary support for the AR913x SoCs
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:15:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <496E39C2.8040208@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231882731.21706.10.camel@dv>
Pavel Roskin =EDrta:
> On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 14:40 +0100, Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> This patch set introduces preliminary support for the Atheros' AR913=
0/AR9132
>> SoCs built-in WMAC device. Tested with compat-wireless-2009-01-12 an=
d 2.6.27.10=20
>> kernel on the following devices:
>> * Atheros AP83-050 reference board (AR9132 SoC, AR9106 RF)
>> * TRENDnet TEW-632BRP router (AR9130 SoC, AR9102 RF)
>> * Mikrotik RB433 board (AR7161 SoC) + AR5416 based miniPCI card
>=20
> I confirm that my AR5416 miniPCI is still working with this patch on =
top
> of yesterdays wireless-testing (master-2009-01-12).
>=20
> Unfortunately, patch named "ath9k: move PCI code into separate file"
> doesn't apply to the today's wireless-testing and needs to be rebased=
=2E
Yes. I will post a new set.
>=20
> Current checkpatch.pl gets confused by several patches because an
> "#endif" in the unchanged part somehow causes the preprocessor stack =
to
> underflow:
>=20
> Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
> scripts/checkpatch.pl line 453.
>=20
> This appears to be a bug in checkpatch.pl and should not be considere=
d a
> problem in the patches.
>=20
I have noticed it, but i'm not a Perl expert, so I have checked the pat=
ches=20
with checkpatch.pl from 2.6.28.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles=
s" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-14 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-13 13:40 [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] ath9k: add preliminary support for the AR913x SoCs Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 01/11] ath9k: convert to struct device Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 02/11] ath9k: convert to use bus-agnostic DMA routines Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 03/11] ath9k: introduce bus specific cache size routine Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 04/11] ath9k: introduce bus specific cleanup routine Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 05/11] ath9k: move PCI code into separate file Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 06/11] ath9k: introduce platform driver for AHB bus support Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 07/11] ath9k: get EEPROM contents from platform data on AHB bus Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 08/11] ath9k: remove (u16) casts from rtc register access Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 09/11] ath9k: fix ar5416Addac_9100 values Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 10/11] ath9k: fix null pointer dereference in ani monitor code Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 11/11] ath9k: enable support for AR9100 Gabor Juhos
2009-01-13 13:40 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-02-01 3:13 ` [ath9k-devel] 2.6.29-rc3 reiser problem? Brian
2009-02-01 23:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-02 1:21 ` Brian
2009-02-02 3:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-02 10:18 ` Brian
2009-02-02 14:30 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-02-03 7:06 ` Brian
2009-02-03 22:17 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-01-13 21:38 ` [ath9k-devel] [PATCH v3 00/11] ath9k: add preliminary support for the AR913x SoCs Pavel Roskin
2009-01-13 21:38 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-01-14 19:15 ` Gabor Juhos [this message]
2009-01-14 19:15 ` Gabor Juhos
2009-01-14 22:02 ` [ath9k-devel] " Pavel Roskin
2009-01-14 22:02 ` Pavel Roskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=496E39C2.8040208@openwrt.org \
--to=juhosg@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.