* IXP4XX queues
@ 2009-01-22 7:42 Miguel Ángel Álvarez
2009-01-22 10:50 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-01-22 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ángel Álvarez @ 2009-01-22 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karl Hiramoto, Krzysztof Halasa, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi
Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
prefer Karl's to none.
What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it
in the main stream kernel?
Thanks
Miguel Ángel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: IXP4XX queues
2009-01-22 7:42 IXP4XX queues Miguel Ángel Álvarez
@ 2009-01-22 10:50 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-01-22 13:08 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
2009-01-22 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karl Hiramoto @ 2009-01-22 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Ángel Álvarez
Cc: Krzysztof Halasa, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Miguel Ángel Álvarez wrote:
> Hi
>
> Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
> for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
> two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
> modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
> prefer Karl's to none.
>
> What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it
> in the main stream kernel?
>
> Thanks
>
> Miguel Ángel
>
>
The patch needs minor rework so it applies cleanly against 2.6.29-rc2
at the moment i don't have time to do this and test it.
--
Karl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: IXP4XX queues
2009-01-22 10:50 ` Karl Hiramoto
@ 2009-01-22 13:08 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ángel Álvarez @ 2009-01-22 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karl Hiramoto; +Cc: Krzysztof Halasa, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote:
> Miguel Ángel Álvarez wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
>> for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
>> two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
>> modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
>> prefer Karl's to none.
>>
>> What do you think of this? Which should be the best way to include it
>> in the main stream kernel?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Miguel Ángel
>>
>>
> The patch needs minor rework so it applies cleanly against 2.6.29-rc2
> at the moment i don't have time to do this and test it.
>
I do not have much problem in doing that rework myself. However I need
help in making its way into the kernel, because I have not good
experiences in that.
Miguel Ángel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: IXP4XX queues
2009-01-22 7:42 IXP4XX queues Miguel Ángel Álvarez
2009-01-22 10:50 ` Karl Hiramoto
@ 2009-01-22 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-01-23 7:38 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Halasa @ 2009-01-22 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Ángel Álvarez
Cc: Karl Hiramoto, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Miguel Ángel Álvarez <gotzoncabanes@gmail.com> writes:
> Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
> for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
> two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
> modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
> prefer Karl's to none.
I will look at this stuff again soon, currently -ENOTIME but this
condition will only last for few days. Thanks for the reminder.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: IXP4XX queues
2009-01-22 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
@ 2009-01-23 7:38 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ángel Álvarez @ 2009-01-23 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Halasa; +Cc: Karl Hiramoto, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi
2009/1/22 Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>:
> Miguel Ángel Álvarez <gotzoncabanes@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Last December we talked about 64 queues and IXP4XX. Karl has a patch
>> for them, and although I think it could be better to splitt it into
>> two different ones ("plain 64 queue expansion" for which I proposed a
>> modified patch based on Karl's, and "debugging and other things"), I
>> prefer Karl's to none.
>
> I will look at this stuff again soon, currently -ENOTIME but this
> condition will only last for few days. Thanks for the reminder.
Sure... I was just offering my help.
Miguel Ángel Álvarez
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-23 7:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-22 7:42 IXP4XX queues Miguel Ángel Álvarez
2009-01-22 10:50 ` Karl Hiramoto
2009-01-22 13:08 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
2009-01-22 15:30 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-01-23 7:38 ` Miguel Ángel Álvarez
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.