From: "Vesa Jääskeläinen" <chaac@nic.fi>
To: The development of GRUB 2 <grub-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build system improvement
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 12:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <497C4046.4060907@nic.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1232851143.23773.13.camel@localhost>
Javier Martín wrote:
> This patch modifies several files in the build system (mainly common.rmk
> and genmk.rb) to reduce the general verbosity of the build process to a
> manageable, semi-informative level. Thus, what currently appears as
> "gcc" calls, several lines long each is turned into lines like:
>
> [M xfs.mod] COMPILE ../src/fs/xfs.c ->
> xfs_mod-fs_xfs.o
> [M xfs.mod] LINK xfs_mod-fs_xfs.o ->
> pre-xfs.o
> [M xfs.mod] Looking for EXPORTED SYMBOL definitions: pre-xfs.o
>
> And so on. The change also makes warning-hunting marginally easier,
> though not by much since the patch intentionally shows a line for nearly
> every process that did so previously. This behavior could be simplified
> further if needed - this post is more of an RFC than anything else.
> Also, it is by no means thorough or complete - only the most common
> processes have been addressed - as I'm a bit busy with exams.
>
> The patch makes the new behavior the default one, so a new make-time
> option is added: V (for "verbose"), which must have the value 1 in order
> to get the behavior, as in "make V=1"
First of all I would like compiling process to be more tidier.
However, what is the difference between Colin's similar patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-25 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-25 2:39 [PATCH] Build system improvement Javier Martín
2009-01-25 10:34 ` Vesa Jääskeläinen [this message]
2009-01-25 13:23 ` Javier Martín
2009-01-25 16:38 ` Colin D Bennett
2009-04-10 23:25 ` phcoder
2009-04-11 10:09 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2009-04-11 11:55 ` phcoder
2009-04-11 15:29 ` Colin D Bennett
2009-04-12 21:24 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-04-13 1:07 ` David Miller
2009-04-13 5:03 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-04-14 14:52 ` Yoshinori K. Okuji
2009-05-03 8:29 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-07-22 12:41 ` Felix Zielcke
2009-07-22 16:14 ` Pavel Roskin
2009-07-22 16:59 ` Robert Millan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=497C4046.4060907@nic.fi \
--to=chaac@nic.fi \
--cc=grub-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.