All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Netfilter Developers <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Network Development list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:31:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4981CBE2.5020306@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49809716.3020204@cosmosbay.com>

While doing oprofile tests I noticed two loops are not properly unrolled by gcc

Using a hand coded unrolled loop provides nice speedup : ipt_do_table
credited of 2.52 % of cpu instead of 3.29 % in tbench.


Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
index ef8b6ca..7bdb2cf 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -65,6 +65,22 @@ do {								\
 #define inline
 #endif
 
+static unsigned long ifname_compare(const void *_a, const void *_b, const void *_mask)
+{
+	const unsigned long *a = (const unsigned long *)_a;
+	const unsigned long *b = (const unsigned long *)_b;
+	const unsigned long *mask = (const unsigned long *)_mask;
+	unsigned long ret;
+
+	ret = (a[0] ^ b[0]) & mask[0];
+	ret |= (a[1] ^ b[1]) & mask[1];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[2] ^ b[2]) & mask[2];
+	if (IFNAMSIZ > 3 * sizeof(unsigned long))
+		ret |= (a[3] ^ b[3]) & mask[3];
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
    We keep a set of rules for each CPU, so we can avoid write-locking
    them in the softirq when updating the counters and therefore
@@ -83,7 +99,6 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		const struct ipt_ip *ipinfo,
 		int isfrag)
 {
-	size_t i;
 	unsigned long ret;
 
 #define FWINV(bool, invflg) ((bool) ^ !!(ipinfo->invflags & (invflg)))
@@ -103,13 +118,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	/* Look for ifname matches; this should unroll nicely. */
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)indev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface_mask)[i];
-	}
-
+	ret = ifname_compare(indev, ipinfo->iniface, ipinfo->iniface_mask);
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_IN)) {
 		dprintf("VIA in mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
 			indev, ipinfo->iniface,
@@ -117,12 +126,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
 		return false;
 	}
 
-	for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
-		ret |= (((const unsigned long *)outdev)[i]
-			^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface)[i])
-			& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface_mask)[i];
-	}
-
+	ret = ifname_compare(outdev, ipinfo->outiface, ipinfo->outiface_mask);
 	if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) {
 		dprintf("VIA out mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
 			outdev, ipinfo->outiface,

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-26 22:15 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Rick Jones
2009-01-26 23:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-26 23:14   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-26 23:19   ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27  9:10     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27  9:15       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 11:29         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 11:37           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 16:23         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 17:33           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-27 18:02             ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:09               ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 19:24                 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:17                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:29                     ` Rick Jones
2009-01-27 22:34                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-27 22:43                         ` Rick Jones
2009-01-28 13:55                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 16:25                     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-01-28 17:07                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-28 17:34                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-29 15:31                           ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-01-30 15:47                             ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 16:54                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:27                                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-30 17:27                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-30 17:50                                     ` Andi Kleen
2009-02-09 13:41                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 15:10                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 15:21                                       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 16:33                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 16:52                                           ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 17:36                                           ` [PATCH] netfilter: xt_physdev fixes Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 18:14                                             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19  8:00                                               ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19  8:14                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in ip6_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 10:19                                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 10:17                                                 ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two loops in physdev_mt() Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 10:02                             ` [PATCH] netfilter: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-20 10:04                               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-09 14:57                           ` 32 core net-next stack/netfilter "scaling" Patrick McHardy
2009-02-10 18:44   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4981CBE2.5020306@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.