From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:21:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49823A13.50703@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233270043.3833.57.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:34 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> I know 2.6.28-rt isn't yet ready, but I could not resist to try
>> it anyway. ;-)
>>
>> Here are few issues and ways to solve them:
>>
>> Currently the -rt tree doesn't link for arch/powerpc:
>>
>> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x27bc): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x28b0): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> Thanks! I have not yet had the chance to apply any arch patches yet. I
> do plan on doing so after getting the code mostly working on x86.
Your email can at an opportune time for me... I was starting to try
2.6.28-rt on ARM and quickly came to the conclusion that the arch
patches weren't the focus yet. But I'm currently side-tracked with
getting my board to even boot a vanilla 2.6.28 kernel first. Do
you expect to get to the arches in the next week or two? If not,
I may head down that path for ARM myself.
Thanks!
-Frank Rowand
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@am.sony.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>
Cc: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:21:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49823A13.50703@am.sony.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1233270043.3833.57.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 00:34 +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> I know 2.6.28-rt isn't yet ready, but I could not resist to try
>> it anyway. ;-)
>>
>> Here are few issues and ways to solve them:
>>
>> Currently the -rt tree doesn't link for arch/powerpc:
>>
>> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x27bc): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `show_interrupts':
>> (.text+0x28b0): undefined reference to `__call_bad_lock_func'
>> make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
>
> Thanks! I have not yet had the chance to apply any arch patches yet. I
> do plan on doing so after getting the code mostly working on x86.
Your email can at an opportune time for me... I was starting to try
2.6.28-rt on ARM and quickly came to the conclusion that the arch
patches weren't the focus yet. But I'm currently side-tracked with
getting my board to even boot a vanilla 2.6.28 kernel first. Do
you expect to get to the arches in the next week or two? If not,
I may head down that path for ARM myself.
Thanks!
-Frank Rowand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-29 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-29 21:34 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-29 21:34 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-29 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 23:21 ` Frank Rowand [this message]
2009-01-29 23:21 ` Frank Rowand
2009-01-30 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 1:51 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-01-31 20:23 ` 2.6.28-rt on ARM [Was: 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC] Uwe Kleine-König
2009-01-31 20:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2009-01-30 23:06 ` 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC Robert Schwebel
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-01-30 23:06 ` Robert Schwebel
2009-01-30 13:07 ` Josh Boyer
2009-01-30 13:07 ` Josh Boyer
2009-01-30 17:45 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-30 17:45 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-30 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-31 19:14 ` [PATCH -rt] powerpc/tracing: Add support for "PREEMPT_TRACE" tracer Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-31 19:14 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-30 17:57 ` 2.6.28-rt on PowerPC Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 17:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-29 23:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-30 2:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 2:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 2:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 3:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-30 3:07 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-01-30 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 4:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 2:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-01-30 2:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49823A13.50703@am.sony.com \
--to=frank.rowand@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.