From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Tanmay Inamdar <tinamdar@apm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches <patches@apm.com>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACoXjcnXoysMeBsGuOb3t5b10zdeJ8pOnuOOzR8AaZhsOOYVEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:42:22 Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 24 January 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> >
> >> +static void xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + /* Hide the PCI host BARs from the kernel as their content doesn't
> >> + * fit well in the resource management
> >> + */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
> >> + dev->resource[i].start = dev->resource[i].end = 0;
> >> + dev->resource[i].flags = 0;
> >> + }
> >> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Hiding X-Gene pci host bridge resources %s\n",
> >> + pci_name(dev));
> >> +}
> >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(XGENE_PCIE_VENDORID, XGENE_PCIE_DEVICEID,
> >> + xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge);
> >
> > Shouldn't this be gone now that the host bridge is correctly shown
> > at the domain root?
>
> In inbound region configuration, whole DDR space is mapped into the
> BAR of RC. When Linux PCI mid-layer starts enumerating, it reads the
> size of BAR of RC and tries to fit it into the memory resource. First
> thing is that the outbound memory is not enough to map the inbound BAR
> space. This creates problem with the resource management logic and
> second thing is that, it is not required to map inbound BAR space RC
> bar as no one will be accessing it further.
>
> As Jason suggested, Bridge BAR's should be 0 size unless the bridge
> itself has registers. However this is not the case with XGene PCIe
> controller. It may have been inherited from the legacy design.
> 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c' has similar fixup function.
Are you sure that is true for the root bridge as well? I don't
remember the details, but I though that for the host bridge,
we don't actually look at the BARs at all.
> > If you want to try out the I/O space, I'd suggest using an Intel
> > e1000 network card, which has both memory and i/o space. There
> > is a patch at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg27684.html
> > that lets you check the I/O registers on it, or you can go
> > through /dev/port from user space.
> >
> > I also haven't seen your patch that adds pci_ioremap_io() for
> > arm64. It would be helpful to keep it in the same patch
> > series, since it won't build without this patch.
>
> I will post the arm64 pci patch along with next revision of this
> driver. That will cover the 'pci_ioremap_io' as well.
Please note that today, Liviu Dudau has also posted patches for this,
so you should coordinate a bit.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 21:12:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACoXjcnXoysMeBsGuOb3t5b10zdeJ8pOnuOOzR8AaZhsOOYVEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 03 February 2014 11:42:22 Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 24 January 2014, Tanmay Inamdar wrote:
> >
> >> +static void xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
> >> +{
> >> + int i;
> >> +
> >> + /* Hide the PCI host BARs from the kernel as their content doesn't
> >> + * fit well in the resource management
> >> + */
> >> + for (i = 0; i < DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE; i++) {
> >> + dev->resource[i].start = dev->resource[i].end = 0;
> >> + dev->resource[i].flags = 0;
> >> + }
> >> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "Hiding X-Gene pci host bridge resources %s\n",
> >> + pci_name(dev));
> >> +}
> >> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(XGENE_PCIE_VENDORID, XGENE_PCIE_DEVICEID,
> >> + xgene_pcie_fixup_bridge);
> >
> > Shouldn't this be gone now that the host bridge is correctly shown
> > at the domain root?
>
> In inbound region configuration, whole DDR space is mapped into the
> BAR of RC. When Linux PCI mid-layer starts enumerating, it reads the
> size of BAR of RC and tries to fit it into the memory resource. First
> thing is that the outbound memory is not enough to map the inbound BAR
> space. This creates problem with the resource management logic and
> second thing is that, it is not required to map inbound BAR space RC
> bar as no one will be accessing it further.
>
> As Jason suggested, Bridge BAR's should be 0 size unless the bridge
> itself has registers. However this is not the case with XGene PCIe
> controller. It may have been inherited from the legacy design.
> 'arch/powerpc/sysdev/ppc4xx_pci.c' has similar fixup function.
Are you sure that is true for the root bridge as well? I don't
remember the details, but I though that for the host bridge,
we don't actually look at the BARs at all.
> > If you want to try out the I/O space, I'd suggest using an Intel
> > e1000 network card, which has both memory and i/o space. There
> > is a patch at http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg27684.html
> > that lets you check the I/O registers on it, or you can go
> > through /dev/port from user space.
> >
> > I also haven't seen your patch that adds pci_ioremap_io() for
> > arm64. It would be helpful to keep it in the same patch
> > series, since it won't build without this patch.
>
> I will post the arm64 pci patch along with next revision of this
> driver. That will cover the 'pci_ioremap_io' as well.
Please note that today, Liviu Dudau has also posted patches for this,
so you should coordinate a bit.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-24 21:32 [RFC PATCH V3 0/4] APM X-Gene PCIe controller Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 1/4] pci: APM X-Gene PCIe controller driver Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 19:42 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 19:42 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-02-03 20:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 20:14 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 20:14 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-02-03 22:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-03 22:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-02-04 19:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-04 19:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 2/4] arm64: dts: APM X-Gene PCIe device tree nodes Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 3/4] dt-bindings: pci: xgene pcie device tree bindings Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` [RFC PATCH V3 4/4] MAINTAINERS: entry for APM X-Gene PCIe host driver Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-24 21:32 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-25 16:09 ` [RFC PATCH V3 0/4] APM X-Gene PCIe controller Dann Frazier
2014-01-25 16:09 ` Dann Frazier
2014-01-27 22:58 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-27 22:58 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 0:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 0:18 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 0:40 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 0:40 ` Tanmay Inamdar
2014-01-30 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 18:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 18:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-01-30 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-30 14:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4985267.LnsktRmabM@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@apm.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tinamdar@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.