Re: [PATCH 14/15] bitops: Change the bitmap index from int to unsigned long [frv]

["H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>]

David Howells wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> 
>>> But how does it break down between "static inline type\nfunction_name" and
>>> "static inline\ntype function_name"?  That's more to the point.
>>>
>> I believe that is the breakdown is roughly what you see above, i.e. over 8:1;
>> the pattern I used was looking for "^static inline[^;(]*$", and a visual
>> examination of the results shows that even if my line count is slighly off the
>> lopsidedness is still dramatic.
> 
> Sorry, I meant:
> 
> "static inline type\nfunction_name" vs "static inline type function_name"
> 

Well, the latter is obviously in vast majority, but that doesn't seem to 
have anything to do with anything at all here...

	-hpa