Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 05:42:40AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there support for this device anywhere?  In particular,
>>>>>>>>>>> the M88E6095 switch.
>>>>>>>>>> Not at the moment, but it should be easy enough to add.  If your
>>>>>>>>>> board already runs on 2.6.28+, I can whip up some patches for you
>>>>>>>>>> to try from the docs I have for that part.
>>>>>>>>> That would be much appreciated, thanks.
>>>>>>>> I noticed that the 6095/6095F are quite similar to the 6131 as far
>>>>>>>> as the register set goes.  So something along these lines (hacky
>>>>>>>> patch, breaks 6131, not for mainline) might just work to detect
>>>>>>>> single 6095s (cascading DSA chips is something that needs more work,
>>>>>>>> let's get the single-chip case working first).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The other thing you'll need to do is create dsa platform devices
>>>>>>>> for your switch chips, a la how it's done in arch/arm/mach-orion5x/
>>>>>>>> or arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/ for example -- you need to pass in a struct
>>>>>>>> device * for your network device, a struct device * for your mii bus,
>>>>>>>> the switch MII address on the MII bus, and names of the individual
>>>>>>>> ports (where you'll specify "cpu" for the port on the switch chip that
>>>>>>>> the CPU is connected to).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let me know if this works.
>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll give it a try.  It will take a little effort
>>>>>>> to get setup as I have to work within the open firmware
>>>>>>> structure (that's how all the various components are
>>>>>>> specified).
>>>>>> Right, we don't have OF bindings yet.  I guess this would make sense
>>>>>> to do generically at some point, since there are quite a few PPC
>>>>>> platforms with DSA switch chips.
>>>>> Here's what I tried - (patch attached) - a trulyhorrible hack,
>>>>> but I've not figured out how to get the correct device pointers
>>>>> from the OF world yet.  The boot log shows that it's trying, but
>>>>> I don't see the DSA layer (M88E690x driver) doing the MII indirection
>>>>> that's needed for this device.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm probably not starting it up correctly, but I think I followed
>>>>> the examples you cited.  Any ideas?
>>>> "indirection needed for this device" -- does that mean that your
>>>> switch chip is configured to use the multi-chip addressing mode?
>>>> (It looks like it, as most of the MII addresses return ffff in
>>>> their ID registers.)  If yes, you should set ->sw_addr to whatever
>>>> MII address the chip has been assigned.
>>> Much better, my switch seems to be found now.
>>>
>>>   Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1
>>>   gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1811
>>>   gfar_mdio_write(cf9db400, 1, 0, 9a03) = 0
>>>   gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 0) = 1a03
>>>   gfar_mdio_read(cf9db400, 1, 1) = 953
>>>   mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387
>>>   eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch
>>>      ...
>>>   root@ppc_target:~ ls /sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/
>>>   24520:01:00  24520:01:02  24520:01:04  24520:01:06
>>>   24520:01:01  24520:01:03  24520:01:05  24520:01:07
>>>
>>> However, the network subsystem still can't locate it.  It may be
>>> a complication of the OF stuff and how the [gianfar] network
>>> device knows what PHY to look at.
>>>
>>>   starting network interfaces...
>>>   24520:01 not found
>>>   eth0: Could not attach to PHY
>>>
>>> Also, how do I specify the [implicit] route within the switch
>>> that connects '24520:01:00' to the CPU port '24520:01:0A' (if
>>> there was such a thing)?  My boot loader has configured the
>>> switch for this path - I've not looked through the log to see
>>> what the DSA layer did.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help
>> Trying the simple/obvious did not work so well:
>>   Distributed Switch Architecture driver version 0.1
>>   mv88e6131_probe(cf9db400, 1) = 2387
>>   eth0: detected a Marvell 88E6095/88E6095F switch
>>   dsa slave smi: probed
>>   lan1.2: 24520:01:00 already attached
>>   Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000024
> 
> What did you do here?

I just tried to force it by making it probe '24520:01:00'
instead of '24520:01'

> Also, can you show me what you're filling the dsa platform data
> structure with?

struct dsa_platform_data _switch_data = {
    .port_names[0]  = "lan1.1",
    .port_names[1]  = "lan1.2",
    .port_names[2]  = "lan1.3",
    .port_names[3]  = "lan1.4",
    .port_names[4]  = "lan1.5",
    .port_names[5]  = "lan1.6",
    .port_names[6]  = "lan1.7",
    .port_names[7]  = "lan1.8",
    .port_names[10]  = "cpu",
    .sw_addr = 1,
};

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------