All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@gefanuc.com>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10. 2 since some idiot deleted 1.10
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:59:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1236120999.10602.70.camel@andromeda>

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 17:38 -0500 schrieb Philip Balister:
>> Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, den 03.03.2009, 21:49 +0100 schrieb GIT User account:
>>>> Module: openembedded.git
>>>> Branch: org.openembedded.dev
>>>> Commit: eee859a9c348871d6d644ece76bc57b151cc80e8
>>>> URL:    http://gitweb.openembedded.net/?p=openembedded.git&a=commit;h=eee859a9c348871d6d644ece76bc57b151cc80e8
>>>>
>>>> Author: Koen Kooi <koen@openembedded.org>
>>>> Date:   Tue Mar  3 21:47:57 2009 +0100
>>>>
>>>> angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10.2 since some idiot deleted 1.10
>>> Ah, are we in that mood again? Take more pills.
>> We need to have a serious discussion about deleting recipes. I know the 
>> deletion of python 2.5 will force me to address the 2.5->2.6 upgrade in 
>> gnuradio before the upstream developers are ready.
>>
>> We need a way to remove recipes, but doing it as part of adding a new 
>> recipe is causing problems for OE users.
> 
> Yes, we need to have a serious discussion about lots of things
> surrounding the OpenEmbedded project, before the popularity kills the
> project. Judging from the amount of interest though, I don't see that
> happening -- neither short term nor long term.
> 

Ok, so if a serious discussion is out of the question, lets just have a normal discussion.

I see this issue to be partially related to the on going discussions regarding submissions. I assume that the "Commit_Policy"[1] on the wiki is either unofficial, out-of-date or optional as it states:

* Changes to core toolchain components need review (gcc, binutils, 
   libtool, pkgconfig, automake, autoconf etc.)

Where:

"Review" is defined as posting it on the mailing lists and getting positive agreement from two or more core developers. 

Now a quick check of my OpenEmbedded mail folder doesn't chuck up any messages with automake in the title that have a patch with this commit. Maybe I'm looking on the wrong mailing list.

Given that the commit policy does seem to be quite a sensible suggestion (it's part of the mechanism that seems to work quit well for the Linux kernel), maybe it needs a little bit of work to qualify it a little (which mailing list for example) and get some more links to it (for example there is no mention of a commit policy in the "adding packages"[2] section of the "Getting started guide".

If nobody objects, I will happily add the link.

Martyn

[1] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Commit_Policy
[2] http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Getting_started#Adding_Packages

-- 
Martyn Welch MEng MPhil MIET (Principal Software Engineer)   T:+44(0)1327322748
GE Fanuc Intelligent Platforms Ltd,        |Registered in England and Wales
Tove Valley Business Park, Towcester,      |(3828642) at 100 Barbirolli Square,
Northants, NN12 6PF, UK T:+44(0)1327359444 |Manchester,M2 3AB  VAT:GB 729849476



  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-04 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20090303204954.CCB9CE8008@amethyst.openembedded.net>
2009-03-03 22:25 ` [oe-commits] Koen Kooi : angstrom 2009.X: bump automake-native to 1.10. 2 since some idiot deleted 1.10 Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-03-03 22:38   ` Philip Balister
2009-03-03 22:56     ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-03-04  9:59       ` Martyn Welch [this message]
2009-03-04 10:13         ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-04 14:18           ` Martyn Welch
2009-03-04 15:43             ` Philip Balister
2009-03-04 10:21         ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-03-04 10:54           ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-04 11:23             ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2009-03-04 11:41               ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-04 15:06                 ` GNUtoo
2009-03-04 11:42               ` Martyn Welch
2009-03-04 15:42                 ` Philip Balister
2009-03-05 15:32               ` Otavio Salvador
2009-03-05 15:30             ` Otavio Salvador
2009-03-04  7:49     ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2009-03-04  7:55     ` Koen Kooi
2009-03-04  7:56     ` Stanislav Brabec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49AE5117.5020806@gefanuc.com \
    --to=martyn.welch@gefanuc.com \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.