[ath9k-devel] [RFC] ath9k: use correct init values for ar9100 devices

[Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>]

Sujith ?rta:
> Gabor Juhos wrote:
>> Apart from the last line, this patch simply swaps the two initval sets as i see
>> it. Would not be simpler to rename them, and then change this line only?
>>
> 
> I didn't bother to check if the initvals were to be swapped or not.

Well, I was curious, so I did it. :)

After some cut&paste job, here is the diff between the original and the new
initvals from your patch:

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h
b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h
index d492363..d5a8aec 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath9k/initvals.h
@@ -658,7 +657,7 @@ static const u32 ar5416Addac_9100[][2] = {
     {0x0000989c,  0x00000000 },
     {0x0000989c,  0x00000000 },
     {0x0000989c,  0x00000000 },
-    {0x000098cc,  0x00000000 },
+    {0x000098c4,  0x00000000 },
 };

 static const u32 ar5416Modes[][6] = {
@@ -862,7 +861,7 @@ static const u32 ar5416Common[][2] = {
     { 0x00008134, 0x00000000 },
     { 0x00008138, 0x00000000 },
     { 0x0000813c, 0x00000000 },
-    { 0x00008144, 0x00000000 },
+    { 0x00008144, 0xffffffff },
     { 0x00008168, 0x00000000 },
     { 0x0000816c, 0x00000000 },
     { 0x00008170, 0x32143320 },

> The patch was a line-by-line copy of the latest initvals. :-)
> Figured this would also make it easier to roll out future updates.

Ok. This version will cause more noise, but it is fine for me.

> 
>>> +#define AR_SREV_VERSION_9100		0x014
>> 0x14?
> 
> Yep, this can be fixed.

I have to send a new patch, or you will take care of it?

Regards,
Gabor