[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F11/system_locallogin.patch


Local login uses usb keys for login.

Add unconfined_shell_domtrans which contains a boolean to turn on and
off login as an unconfined user.

local_login now runs well as  a confined domain

sulogin calls getpw

sulogin will transition to unconfined_t on non MLS machines.


Redhat does not use pam for sulogin

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkmwCWoACgkQrlYvE4MpobORQACeOjGiOFiIgXfExi5f4Zt7aBFr
xswAnA4MJoZmSgCD33DC87dJvuqDms/O
=v2h9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_locallogin.patch

Fixes for zseries

lots of stuff differs from upstream.

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Christopher J. PeBenito]

On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_locallogin.patch
> 
> Fixes for zseries
> 
> lots of stuff differs from upstream.

What is the generic usb device usage for?

It looks like that the sulogin_no_pam option needs to transition to a
tunable (locallogin_sulogin_pam).  Does redhat patch on SELinux support
to sulogin, since you added the rules for computing the user contexts?

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

On 02/12/2010 03:10 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_locallogin.patch
>>
>> Fixes for zseries
>>
>> lots of stuff differs from upstream.
> 
> What is the generic usb device usage for?
I think this comes from fingerprint reader.  Google is a wonderful thing.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301961
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=208401

> 
> It looks like that the sulogin_no_pam option needs to transition to a
> tunable (locallogin_sulogin_pam).  Does redhat patch on SELinux support
> to sulogin, since you added the rules for computing the user contexts?
> 

sulogin uses pam at Red Hat so it goes through pam_selinux.

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Christopher J. PeBenito]

On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:09 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 03:10 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> >> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_locallogin.patch
> >>
> >> Fixes for zseries
> >>
> >> lots of stuff differs from upstream.
> > 
> > What is the generic usb device usage for?
> I think this comes from fingerprint reader.  Google is a wonderful thing.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301961
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=208401

It seems that it would be better to make sure fingerprint devices have
their own label.  We wouldn't want any random generic usb device being
used for authentication.

> > It looks like that the sulogin_no_pam option needs to transition to a
> > tunable (locallogin_sulogin_pam).  Does redhat patch on SELinux support
> > to sulogin, since you added the rules for computing the user contexts?
> > 
> 
> sulogin uses pam at Red Hat so it goes through pam_selinux.

Then I'm confused.  Why was this added:

+ifdef(`distro_redhat',`
+	define(`sulogin_no_pam')

-- 
Chris PeBenito
Tresys Technology, LLC
(410) 290-1411 x150

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

On 02/16/2010 09:02 AM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:09 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> On 02/12/2010 03:10 PM, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 17:12 -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>> http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F12/system_locallogin.patch
>>>>
>>>> Fixes for zseries
>>>>
>>>> lots of stuff differs from upstream.
>>>
>>> What is the generic usb device usage for?
>> I think this comes from fingerprint reader.  Google is a wonderful thing.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301961
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=208401
> 
> It seems that it would be better to make sure fingerprint devices have
> their own label.  We wouldn't want any random generic usb device being
> used for authentication.
>
Not easy to do,  Since you would need to generate udev rules for labeling of each usb device.
I don't believe these have a standard path.
 
>>> It looks like that the sulogin_no_pam option needs to transition to a
>>> tunable (locallogin_sulogin_pam).  Does redhat patch on SELinux support
>>> to sulogin, since you added the rules for computing the user contexts?
>>>
>>
>> sulogin uses pam at Red Hat so it goes through pam_selinux.
> 
> Then I'm confused.  Why was this added:
> 
> +ifdef(`distro_redhat',`
> +	define(`sulogin_no_pam')
> 
Sorry I was mistaken it does NOT use pam.

sulogin on Red Hat platforms has the following

#ifdef WITH_SELINUX
        if (is_selinux_enabled > 0) {
          security_context_t scon=NULL;
          char *seuser=NULL;
          char *level=NULL;
          if (getseuserbyname("root", &seuser, &level) == 0)
                  if (get_default_context_with_level(seuser, level, 0, &scon) > 0) {
                          if (setexeccon(scon) != 0)
                                  fprintf(stderr, "setexeccon faile\n");
                          freecon(scon);
                  }
                free(seuser);
                free(level);
        }
#endif

[refpolicy] system_locallogin.patch

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dwalsh/SELinux/F14/system_locallogin.patch

Add sushell so init in single user mode will transition to unconfined_t
or sysadm_t

local_login_t needs sys_admin

read usb devices for fingerprint?
Read video for face recognition.  Sheesh.


Terminal relabeling of console on certain arches.  (Power)

Does not need unconfined

fixes for sulogin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkx2+wIACgkQrlYvE4MpobM4IQCfbZIGNQMkE8U78MiV5BXsUAjl
QjIAnixr/nfdR3lWtBhxMN3xrXh8z4KB
=tOrC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----