All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration
@ 2009-03-09  3:13 Wei Yongjun
  2009-03-10  1:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
  2009-03-10  1:33 ` Wei Yongjun
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2009-03-09  3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

Hi All

The following series of 6 patches is the implementation of IETF STREAM-RESET
draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctpstrrst-01).

With this series, we'll implement most of the draft's defines. We skip the
"deferred reset processing" on receiver side procedures for the Outgoing SSN
Reset Request Parameter. This may appear later as a patch.

I'd really appreciate people take a look and review this patches.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration
  2009-03-09  3:13 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration Wei Yongjun
@ 2009-03-10  1:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
  2009-03-10  1:33 ` Wei Yongjun
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vlad Yasevich @ 2009-03-10  1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

Wei Yongjun wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> The following series of 6 patches is the implementation of IETF STREAM-RESET
> draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctpstrrst-01).
> 
> With this series, we'll implement most of the draft's defines. We skip the
> "deferred reset processing" on receiver side procedures for the Outgoing SSN
> Reset Request Parameter. This may appear later as a patch.
> 
> I'd really appreciate people take a look and review this patches.
> 

Hi Wei

This is an interesting draft, and it's good to have an prototype implementation,
but I think there are some holes in the draft still.

I think the biggest hole is the API.  Since it's not documented at all, I would
be extremely hesitant of opening any of it.

I need to do a detailed review of this and I invite you to send any comments you
have to Randy and the rest of the authors.

I think that by missing the deferred reset processing, we are open to some interesting
problems.  The issue is that if the stream reset arrives prior to any pending TSNs, we
need to enter this deferred processing state.  This could be very easy to hit and it needs
to be done.  There are also some inconsistencies in the text for deferred processing.

This is really an RFC series, since I think the spec needs a lot of work before I can
take this for the main-line kernel.

-vlad


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration
  2009-03-09  3:13 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration Wei Yongjun
  2009-03-10  1:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
@ 2009-03-10  1:33 ` Wei Yongjun
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yongjun @ 2009-03-10  1:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-sctp

Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Wei Yongjun wrote:
>   
>> Hi All
>>
>> The following series of 6 patches is the implementation of IETF STREAM-RESET
>> draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stewart-tsvwg-sctpstrrst-01).
>>
>> With this series, we'll implement most of the draft's defines. We skip the
>> "deferred reset processing" on receiver side procedures for the Outgoing SSN
>> Reset Request Parameter. This may appear later as a patch.
>>
>> I'd really appreciate people take a look and review this patches.
>>
>>     
>
>   

Hi Vlad

Thank you for reply.

> Hi Wei
>
> This is an interesting draft, and it's good to have an prototype implementation,
> but I think there are some holes in the draft still.
>
> I think the biggest hole is the API.  Since it's not documented at all, I would
> be extremely hesitant of opening any of it.
>   

Yes, this is the biggest problem. Just like socket API, if it changed, we
will have much works to do.^_^

> I need to do a detailed review of this and I invite you to send any comments you
> have to Randy and the rest of the authors.
>   

I will do this.

> I think that by missing the deferred reset processing, we are open to some interesting
> problems.  The issue is that if the stream reset arrives prior to any pending TSNs, we
> need to enter this deferred processing state.  This could be very easy to hit and it needs
> to be done.  There are also some inconsistencies in the text for deferred processing.
>   

To do this, I need more document. I will send comments to the authors of
this draft.

> This is really an RFC series, since I think the spec needs a lot of work before I can
> take this for the main-line kernel.
>   

I will continue to develop this utils it become a RFC. And will do more test
using our test tool.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-10  1:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-03-09  3:13 [net-next-2.6 PATCH 0/6] sctp: implement IETF SCTP Stream Reconfiguration Wei Yongjun
2009-03-10  1:01 ` Vlad Yasevich
2009-03-10  1:33 ` Wei Yongjun

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.