Re: How much of a mess does OpenVZ make? ;) Was: What can OpenVZ do?

[Cedric Le Goater <legoater@free.fr>]

Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:57:55PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 03:04:05PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>> dave@nimitz:~/kernels/linux-2.6-openvz$ git diff v2.6.27.10... kernel/cpt/ | diffstat 
> 
>>>  47 files changed, 20702 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> One important thing that leaves out is the interaction that this code
>>> has with the rest of the kernel.  That's critically important when
>>> considering long-term maintenance, and I'd be curious how the OpenVZ
>>> folks view it. 
>> OpenVZ as-is in some cases wants some functions to be made global
>> (and if C/R code will be modular, exported). Or probably several
>> iterators added.
>>
>> But it's negligible amount of changes compared to main code.
> 
> Here is what C/R code wants from pid allocator.
> 
> With the introduction of hierarchical PID namespaces, struct pid can
> have not one but many numbers -- tuple (pid_0, pid_1, ..., pid_N),
> where pid_i is pid number in pid_ns which has level i.
> 
> Now root pid_ns of container has level n -- numbers from level n to N
> inclusively should be dumped and restored.
> 
> During struct pid creation first n-1 numbers can be anything, because the're
> outside of pid_ns, but the rest should be the same.
> 
> Code will be ifdeffed and commented, but anyhow, this is an example of
> change C/R will require from the rest of the kernel.
> 
> 
> 
> --- a/kernel/pid.c
> +++ b/kernel/pid.c
> @@ -182,6 +182,34 @@ static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
>  	return -1;
>  }
>  
> +static int set_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, pid_t pid)
> +{
> +	int offset;
> +	struct pidmap *map;
> +
> +	offset = pid & BITS_PER_PAGE_MASK;
> +	map = &pid_ns->pidmap[pid/BITS_PER_PAGE];
> +	if (unlikely(!map->page)) {
> +		void *page = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		/*
> +		 * Free the page if someone raced with us
> +		 * installing it:
> +		 */
> +		spin_lock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +		if (map->page)
> +			kfree(page);
> +		else
> +			map->page = page;
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&pidmap_lock);
> +		if (unlikely(!map->page))
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	if (test_and_set_bit(offset, map->page))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	atomic_dec(&map->nr_free);
> +	return pid;
> +}
> +
>  int next_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, int last)
>  {
>  	int offset;
> @@ -239,7 +267,7 @@ void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
>  	call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
>  }
>  
> -struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
> +struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, int *cr_nr, unsigned int cr_level)
>  {
>  	struct pid *pid;
>  	enum pid_type type;
> @@ -253,7 +281,10 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
>  
>  	tmp = ns;
>  	for (i = ns->level; i >= 0; i--) {
> -		nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
> +		if (cr_nr && ns->level - i <= cr_level)
> +			nr = set_pidmap(tmp, cr_nr[ns->level - i]);
> +		else
> +			nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
>  		if (nr < 0)
>  			goto out_free;

This patch supposes that the process is restored in a state which took several 
clone(CLONE_NEWPID) to reach. if you replay these clone(), which is what restart
is at the end : an optimized replay, you would only need something like below. 



Index: 2.6.git/kernel/pid.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.git.orig/kernel/pid.c
+++ 2.6.git/kernel/pid.c
@@ -122,12 +122,12 @@ static void free_pidmap(struct upid *upi
 	atomic_inc(&map->nr_free);
 }
 
-static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, pid_t upid)
 {
 	int i, offset, max_scan, pid, last = pid_ns->last_pid;
 	struct pidmap *map;
 
-	pid = last + 1;
+	pid = upid ? upid : last + 1;
 	if (pid >= pid_max)
 		pid = RESERVED_PIDS;
 	offset = pid & BITS_PER_PAGE_MASK;
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
 	call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
 }
 
-struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
+struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, pid_t next_pid)
 {
 	struct pid *pid;
 	enum pid_type type;
@@ -253,10 +253,15 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespa
 
 	tmp = ns;
 	for (i = ns->level; i >= 0; i--) {
-		nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
+		nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp, next_pid);
 		if (nr < 0)
 			goto out_free;
 
+		/* The next_pid is only applicable for the ns namespace, not
+		 * its parents.
+		 */
+		next_pid = 0;
+
 		pid->numbers[i].nr = nr;
 		pid->numbers[i].ns = tmp;
 		tmp = tmp->parent;





Well, that's how we do it but I'm not against your patch. It fits our need also. 
It's just a bit intrusive for the pid bitmap. if we mix both path, we get something
like this fake patch, which is a bit less intrusive IMO. not tested though.

 

@@ -122,12 +122,12 @@ static void free_pidmap(struct upid *upi
 	atomic_inc(&map->nr_free);
 }
 
-static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns)
+static int alloc_pidmap(struct pid_namespace *pid_ns, pid_t upid)
 {
 	int i, offset, max_scan, pid, last = pid_ns->last_pid;
 	struct pidmap *map;
 
-	pid = last + 1;
+	pid = upid ? upid : last + 1;
 	if (pid >= pid_max)
 		pid = RESERVED_PIDS;
 	offset = pid & BITS_PER_PAGE_MASK;


@@ -239,7 +267,7 @@ void free_pid(struct pid *pid)
 	call_rcu(&pid->rcu, delayed_put_pid);
 }
 
-struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
+struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns, int *cr_nr, unsigned int cr_level)
 {
 	struct pid *pid;
 	enum pid_type type;
@@ -253,7 +281,10 @@ struct pid *alloc_pid(struct pid_namespace *ns)
 
 	tmp = ns;
 	for (i = ns->level; i >= 0; i--) {
-		nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
+		if (cr_nr && ns->level - i <= cr_level)
+			nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp, cr_nr[ns->level - i]);
+			if (nr != cr_nr[ns->level - i])
+				return -EBUSY;
+		else
+			nr = alloc_pidmap(tmp);
 		if (nr < 0)
 			goto out_free;
 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>