From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] (latest tip) make dequeue_task less confusing
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:26:11 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B8CE2B.8070402@davidnewall.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 319 bytes --]
The dequeue_patch function in kernel/sched.c is complicated by
including a sleep parameter. This parameter is always zero
except in one instance. This patch clarifies the task of
dequeue_patch by removing the sleep parameter and moving the
code that handles non-zero sleep to that one place where it is
needed.
[-- Attachment #2: sched.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1782 bytes --]
--- kernel/sched.c 2009-03-12 18:41:41.000000000 +1030
+++ kernel/sched.c.dn 2009-03-12 18:45:18.000000000 +1030
@@ -1791,21 +1791,10 @@
p->se.on_rq = 1;
}
-static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int sleep)
+static void dequeue_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (sleep) {
- if (p->se.last_wakeup) {
- update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
- p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
- p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
- } else {
- update_avg(&p->se.avg_wakeup,
- sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity);
- }
- }
-
sched_info_dequeued(p);
- p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
p->se.on_rq = 0;
}
@@ -1875,7 +1864,22 @@
if (task_contributes_to_load(p))
rq->nr_uninterruptible++;
- dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ if (sleep) {
+ if (p->se.last_wakeup) {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_overlap,
+ p->se.sum_exec_runtime - p->se.last_wakeup);
+ p->se.last_wakeup = 0;
+ } else {
+ update_avg(&p->se.avg_wakeup,
+ sysctl_sched_wakeup_granularity);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);*/
+ sched_info_dequeued(p);
+ p->sched_class->dequeue_task(rq, p, sleep);
+ p->se.on_rq = 0;
+
dec_nr_running(rq);
}
@@ -5323,7 +5327,7 @@
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
running = task_current(rq, p);
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
if (running)
p->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, p);
@@ -5372,7 +5376,7 @@
}
on_rq = p->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, p, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, p);
p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
set_load_weight(p);
@@ -9189,7 +9193,7 @@
on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq;
if (on_rq)
- dequeue_task(rq, tsk, 0);
+ dequeue_task(rq, tsk);
if (unlikely(running))
tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-12 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 8:56 David Newall [this message]
2009-03-12 9:55 ` [PATCH] (latest tip) make dequeue_task less confusing Ingo Molnar
2009-03-12 13:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-03-12 18:02 ` David Newall
2009-03-13 0:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-13 3:58 ` David Newall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49B8CE2B.8070402@davidnewall.com \
--to=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.